All good things come to those who wait.. the Synth Squad 2 thread
- KVRAF
- 7872 posts since 21 Dec, 2002 from MD USA
so in order to upgrade to the whole new package we got to pay an upgrade for each piece? Well I'm out.
my music: http://www.alexcooperusa.com
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
-
- KVRist
- 139 posts since 20 May, 2006 from canada
scintillator wrote:Angus_FX, IMHO it's a mistake to discuss pricing policy in such detail on kvr. Make a FAQ with a few answers, make a few posts to further explain your position - that's it. Don't let yourself to be dragged in into this - there're people for whom it'll always be expensive. They want the best for fifty bucks. How are you to explain to them that Strobe2 has very advanced technology under the hood, which is very rare for synths, that development time and effort costs money, that running a business in the UK is expensive, etc. They'll still want it for fifty bucks. So IMHO stick to discussing features, improvements, Cypher2, etc. Discussing prices is a waste of time and yes, a mistake.
I agree - but it's also kinda refreshing.
(btw - people are forgetting what a steal the original SSquad was - 3+ synths for slightly more than the price of 1 - 6 years ago.)
vespesian (sean)
You're in an amazing state - so stay there.
You're in an amazing state - so stay there.
- KVRAF
- 3815 posts since 20 Apr, 2005
To be honest, not really. Many have been long term ss owners, so perfectly reasonable to speculate as to an update.Angus_FX wrote: Think it's a bit unreasonable to speculate on products that haven't even been announced yet. Do you think we'd charge Strobe2 owners full price for Cypher2, bearing in mind how much they have in common?
You've not said anything about reduced prices cypher/amber so there is nothing for people to go by.
edited: rant on upgrading price removed, apologies I had an incorrect price point...
Last edited by _leras on Sat Sep 19, 2015 11:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 2258 posts since 25 Jun, 2008 from Montreal, Canada
I'm a big fan of the JUCE framework (clean vector and re-sizable). Angus, from now on can you tell if all future FXpansion products will use it?
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 4735 posts since 18 Jul, 2002 from London, UK
£80? Where'd you get that from? Upgrade is £52 / EUR 72 / $79 inc. taxes for people who already own SS1.
We tend to do .x updates with maintenance & small tweaks (two of them for SSv1), but we're somewhat wary of adding features at point-releases - aside from anything else, it tends to invalidate previous work on manuals, tutorials etc. - something we're more thorough about than many. We think features should be designed together as a whole, and as such there isn't necessarily any need to add functionality features (as distinct from maintenance and compatibility) mid-way through something's life.
Occasionally there'll be something obvious we've overlooked that can be added on a right click menu or in a prefs panel somewhere, but it's very much the exception.
We tend to do .x updates with maintenance & small tweaks (two of them for SSv1), but we're somewhat wary of adding features at point-releases - aside from anything else, it tends to invalidate previous work on manuals, tutorials etc. - something we're more thorough about than many. We think features should be designed together as a whole, and as such there isn't necessarily any need to add functionality features (as distinct from maintenance and compatibility) mid-way through something's life.
Occasionally there'll be something obvious we've overlooked that can be added on a right click menu or in a prefs panel somewhere, but it's very much the exception.
This isn't JUCE, it's our home grown vector framework. I think it's highly likely that all of our future products will use it, certainly the next couple will. Feels like the only sane way to go for big plug-ins with complex UI. Something simpler like DCAM Dynamics or Single Mault might not need it.I'm a big fan of the JUCE framework (clean vector and re-sizable). Angus, from now on can you tell if all future FXpansion products will use it?
This account is dormant, I am no longer employed by FXpansion / ROLI.
Find me on LinkedIn or elsewhere if you need to get in touch.
Find me on LinkedIn or elsewhere if you need to get in touch.
- KVRAF
- 2236 posts since 23 May, 2005 from West Country, UK
Coming from any less reputable company I would dismiss that as flannel of the highest orderAngus_FX wrote: We tend to do .x updates with maintenance & small tweaks (two of them for SSv1), but we're somewhat wary of adding features at point-releases - aside from anything else, it tends to invalidate previous work on manuals, tutorials etc. - something we're more thorough about than many. We think features should be designed together as a whole, and as such there isn't necessarily any need to add functionality features (as distinct from maintenance and compatibility) mid-way through something's life.
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
We discussed performance earlier in the thread. Here is a top of the line CPU from 5 years ago .. i7-980x at stock speeds. 50 instances doing 3 note chorded arps at 256 samples (4ms).


If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
- KVRAF
- 20711 posts since 22 Nov, 2000 from Southern California
On my 2013 MacBook Air i7, I found that with 4x oversampling/32 voices or 8x oversampling/16 voices, Strobe 2 uses almost half as much CPU as Strobe 1. Strobe 2 and Strobe 1 perform pretty much the same for me at 2x oversampling.
- KVRAF
- 3815 posts since 20 Apr, 2005
Apologies. Clearly had an incorrect price. Have edited previous post. £52 is much more reasonable!Angus_FX wrote:£80? Where'd you get that from? Upgrade is £52 / EUR 72 / $79 inc. taxes for people who already own SS1.
- KVRian
- 694 posts since 8 Apr, 2012 from planet Earth
- KVRAF
- 8644 posts since 2 Oct, 2006 from Leeds, UK
I spent some quality time with Strobe2 a couple of nights ago and it's a different beast to Strobe 1, i know some are saying it's just a re-skin or whatever but it sounds a lot better to me( relative i know), has a more 3d analog quality to it and that's just adjusting the same parameters as Strobe.
Reaaally nice filters, can get some phat resonant basses and the new fx are very nice, i think they're quality enough to use in the track whereas i normally would use 3rd party fx.
I still use Synth Squad, my goto has always been Cypher but i think Strobe2 has just taken that mantle.
Reaaally nice filters, can get some phat resonant basses and the new fx are very nice, i think they're quality enough to use in the track whereas i normally would use 3rd party fx.
I still use Synth Squad, my goto has always been Cypher but i think Strobe2 has just taken that mantle.
Latest release and Socials: https://linktr.ee/ph.i.ltr3
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 4735 posts since 18 Jul, 2002 from London, UK
@ musikmachine partly it's that Strobe2 runs at 2x oversampled by default (for the same or less cpu% than Strobe1 at 1x, on modern Intel chips). There are small improvements to the accuracy of the oscillator, filter & envelopes, but it's going from 1x to 2x that makes the biggest difference.
If you don't mind Strobe1's CPU load at 2x - with v2 you can go to 4x for the same amount (30% of one core @ 32 voices, 44.1K, i5-2500). It's designed to be playable in realtime all the way up to 8x on the recent generations of chips ("Sandy Bridge" aka i5/i7-2xxx and newer).
If you don't mind Strobe1's CPU load at 2x - with v2 you can go to 4x for the same amount (30% of one core @ 32 voices, 44.1K, i5-2500). It's designed to be playable in realtime all the way up to 8x on the recent generations of chips ("Sandy Bridge" aka i5/i7-2xxx and newer).
This account is dormant, I am no longer employed by FXpansion / ROLI.
Find me on LinkedIn or elsewhere if you need to get in touch.
Find me on LinkedIn or elsewhere if you need to get in touch.
- KVRAF
- 8644 posts since 2 Oct, 2006 from Leeds, UK
I always run at 2x in Strobe that's why i was so surprised. I guess the new controls and drive gain will factor into it. I'll try at 4x, some pads were chewing up my cpu at 2x though but for bass and leads it should be fine. Is it optimised for AMD chips though?
Latest release and Socials: https://linktr.ee/ph.i.ltr3
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 4735 posts since 18 Jul, 2002 from London, UK
It's not currently optimised for AMD although there may be at least something we can do about that. What chip are you running there?
This account is dormant, I am no longer employed by FXpansion / ROLI.
Find me on LinkedIn or elsewhere if you need to get in touch.
Find me on LinkedIn or elsewhere if you need to get in touch.

