KVR Audio

bmanic · Post by **bmanic** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:38 pm

aciddose,

do I need to dig in the xhip thread for the latest betas or are you keeping them on your page somewhere too? Would love to check out xhip once more (it's a long time since I last tried it).

Cheers!
bManic

aciddose · Post by **aciddose** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:57 pm

its all on the site.

bmanic · Post by **bmanic** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:31 pm

ok, thanks!

- bManic

vvanrij · Post by **vvanrij** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:55 pm

wwwwwill there ever be a normal gui?

Vonbrucken · Post by **Vonbrucken** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:47 pm

don't loose time with it , there is so many synth better around there

vvanrij · Post by **vvanrij** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:07 pm

I just keep loving Albino 3 more and more, its so inspiring

tony tony chopper · Post by **tony tony chopper** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:33 pm

tony, when the pulsewidth is adjusted, you get a layer of 16 unison saws replacing the saw waveform

Not that it really matters, but are you sure it's not 14? I counted them (since I didn't know), and always ended up with 14. It's a detail but if I'm right you have a bug somewhere, or 4 saws tuned the same way.

one memory access, one add per saw.

mmh you said 16x oversampling? Try 16 mem accesses, 16 adds per sample then.

A wavetable would be more efficient. Since we know the Virus uses wavetables, it probably does for its saws as well.

and that would be 50*32 or 1600 saw waves

yes, but a Virus beats that (they say). What I mean is, if the (stack of) processors in it do better than my AMD 3500, it's definitely not bad at all.

gsoto · Post by **gsoto** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 1:42 am

bmanic wrote:By the way, gsoto, you definately seem to have a talent for preset design so keep going at it! What you've done with xhip is nothing short of amazing!

Thanks!! You really managed to encourage me.

aciddose · Post by **aciddose** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:52 am

"Not that it really matters, but are you sure it's not 14? I counted them (since I didn't know), and always ended up with 14. It's a detail but if I'm right you have a bug somewhere, or 4 saws tuned the same way."

how did you manange to do that? no, there are 16 per oscillator while unison is enabled for the saw wave.

i'm not sure how you managed to "count" them, such a concept is fairly insane. the only method i could come up with was an accurate fourier plot, and here you can clearly count sixteen.

http://xhip.cjb.net/temp/public/saws.png

tony tony chopper · Post by **tony tony chopper** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:00 am

I just sampled a period and counted the peaks in the waveform

edit: but you're right, I counted wrong

aciddose · Post by **aciddose** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:15 am

shows sixteen there too though :P

vvanrij · Post by **vvanrij** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:17 pm

So accid, 2 things

1. What is so special about xhip?
2. Will it 'ever' get a normal ui?

-Victor

Vonbrucken · Post by **Vonbrucken** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:30 pm

what is special about xhip ? nothing apart the waves around it ;

jupiter8 · Post by **jupiter8** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:40 pm

vvanrij wrote:So accid, 2 things

1. What is so special about xhip?
2. Will it 'ever' get a normal ui?

-Victor

1. It sounds good. With low CPU consumption.
2. Probably.

DavenH · Post by **DavenH** » Tue Aug 15, 2006 1:12 pm

I downloaded xhip but was told it was an invalid win32 application

VSTis as good as hardware? Similar to Access Virus Quality?