Extreme Sample Converter?
-
stephenpaulharper stephenpaulharper https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=73921
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 778 posts since 4 Jul, 2005 from Atlanta
I could swear that at some point ESC was touting ST2 conversions in the new 3.0 version. Now I see no mention of that on the site. Hmmm. Am I nuts?
-
- KVRAF
- 2233 posts since 28 Jul, 2003
No it was listed.
Maybe have to ask what happened there. This was also one of the main conversions that I was interested in.
Maybe have to ask what happened there. This was also one of the main conversions that I was interested in.
My main tools: Kontakt, Omnisphere, Samplemodeling + Audio Modeling. Unify = godsend. Tari's libraries also rock.
- KVRian
- 1004 posts since 2 Aug, 2004 from Sweden
I'm not saying IK or SR had anything to do with it, so lets not start a rumour that's false, it might for instance have been technical reasons. But if they did I'm not sure it was a good business decision keeping ST2-sounds as a totally closed format. I might not be typical, but that together with the dongle would be enough to keep me from doing any more business with IK/SR, I've been holding off a bit waiting for those things to clear or me to get ok with it. But it feels like this is the last nail in the coffin. Too bad. I like eSoundz and SR, both their service and the overall quality of the products they're involved with and I'm normally a very loyal customer to companies I've worked up a relationship with. But I don't like to feel locked up - and there's plenty of other suppliers and formats.
-
- KVRian
- 1327 posts since 8 Nov, 2003 from DC
All I have to say on the subject of ESC and ST2 is 1, yes please as destination and 2, as a source, it gets complicated, according to what I think I know.
If I recall correctly, I did once read Garth of Chickensys saying that translation from Sampletank was frowned on by IK because the value of Sampletank is intwined with the samples such that they percieve their product as the samples as much as the engine, and don't want there to be ready accessibility to the samples lest they get pirated.
Take none of the above as gospel, it is an interpretation of a memory of a forum post from Northern Sounds. I must emphasize that caveat.
However, it is interesting that Wlodzimierz has recently posted in the SR forum about the question of conversion from Sampletank. http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=120343 Translator and Samplit from CDXtract (and promised in CDXtract 5) allow for conversion into ST2. ESC currently allows bidirectional conversion with ST1.
My take? We shall see. I'll take simple sf2 and WusikSND convertability to ST2 and be happy. But Kontakt/ST2 interoperability would be huge and more than welcome.
If I recall correctly, I did once read Garth of Chickensys saying that translation from Sampletank was frowned on by IK because the value of Sampletank is intwined with the samples such that they percieve their product as the samples as much as the engine, and don't want there to be ready accessibility to the samples lest they get pirated.
Take none of the above as gospel, it is an interpretation of a memory of a forum post from Northern Sounds. I must emphasize that caveat.
However, it is interesting that Wlodzimierz has recently posted in the SR forum about the question of conversion from Sampletank. http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=120343 Translator and Samplit from CDXtract (and promised in CDXtract 5) allow for conversion into ST2. ESC currently allows bidirectional conversion with ST1.
My take? We shall see. I'll take simple sf2 and WusikSND convertability to ST2 and be happy. But Kontakt/ST2 interoperability would be huge and more than welcome.
-
- KVRist
- 476 posts since 20 Mar, 2004 from Netherlands
It seems 
has been moderatedBassballjg wrote: http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=120343
-
- KVRian
- 1327 posts since 8 Nov, 2003 from DC
Fascinating.mmdejonge wrote:It seemshas been moderatedBassballjg wrote: http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=120343
-
- KVRist
- 476 posts since 20 Mar, 2004 from Netherlands
I'm just curious why the post has been deleted and what was in it. ESC is on my wishlist and ST2 export would be great.
As much as I loved ST2 and SS2 when they first got out, I don't use them as much as I thought I'd do - the clumsy preset browser being one of the main reasons.
Still it would be nice to be able to export the most useful samples to other formats...
As much as I loved ST2 and SS2 when they first got out, I don't use them as much as I thought I'd do - the clumsy preset browser being one of the main reasons.
Still it would be nice to be able to export the most useful samples to other formats...
-
- KVRist
- 446 posts since 24 Apr, 2002
As for converting out of a certain format (like ST2), perhaps the adage that says "just because you can do it, doesn't mean you should do it" is applicable.
ST is different in that most of the sounds you get for it are not user-made but made by the factory or via other means. Which means that most of the intent of creating ST sounds is to directly support ST itself.
We just found it respectful to honor IK and SR in that way, to keep ST sounds in the ST arena which would promote value to ST itself, since that was a major intent.
It's sort of like taking Cassette Tape, Inc., and lets say they put out a bunch of hit songs, and they published them only on cassette instead of vinyl or CD so it would promote the sales of cassette tapes.
It's an arguable point, though, it can be looked on from a different angle and I'd say there's valid points. But personally Chicken Systems decided on that course of action, for now at least.
ST is different in that most of the sounds you get for it are not user-made but made by the factory or via other means. Which means that most of the intent of creating ST sounds is to directly support ST itself.
We just found it respectful to honor IK and SR in that way, to keep ST sounds in the ST arena which would promote value to ST itself, since that was a major intent.
It's sort of like taking Cassette Tape, Inc., and lets say they put out a bunch of hit songs, and they published them only on cassette instead of vinyl or CD so it would promote the sales of cassette tapes.
It's an arguable point, though, it can be looked on from a different angle and I'd say there's valid points. But personally Chicken Systems decided on that course of action, for now at least.
-
- KVRAF
- 6596 posts since 21 Jun, 2004 from Secret Underground Hideout
chickenman i don't know why yer in this thread (hijack?) but as far as i can remember the bugs are...some kontact to sf2 either fails or crashes the prog and, my hard drive doesn't show up so i have to put files on the desktop
"Most people who experiment with drugs are not lying in the streets, suffocating on their own vomit. If you want to see some of that, go to the Pub on Saturday night at closing time." ozwest
-
- KVRist
- 446 posts since 24 Apr, 2002
Feel free to send any problem source files to www.chickensys.com/translator/bugreports - we'll check them out.androidlove wrote:some kontact to sf2 either fails or crashes the prog and, my hard drive doesn't show up so i have to put files on the desktop
Are you saying that your "hard drive" meaning like your F: drive or something, doesn't show up in Translator? That's highly unusual, you certainly don't mean that? We simply just get the list from Windows OS.
-
- KVRian
- 1327 posts since 8 Nov, 2003 from DC
I brought up Translator in my post, mentioning a vague recollection of Garth having stated a reason for not having SampleTank as a conversion source, and a point of curiosity in this thread has been about ST2 support in ESC 3. His post only spoke to my point and question, for which I am grateful to have that clarification.androidlove wrote:chickenman i don't know why yer in this thread (hijack?) but as far as i can remember the bugs are...some kontact to sf2 either fails or crashes the prog and, my hard drive doesn't show up so i have to put files on the desktop
This thread is about the future of ESC. Let us please not open another front in the Translator wars. We deserve to have at least one thread about sample conversion without a lot of arguments about people's problems with Translator.
-
- KVRian
- 964 posts since 11 May, 2004 from cologne,germany
as this is a free forum where anyone can say anything i say this: the crashes of the emulator x file convertor i experience always happen in the conversion stage and not when selecting samples. plus, i think that extreme sample convertor is much more stable than translator. a combination of esc and awave does anything you want i think. i just don´t like translator, fight chicken disease now!
-
stephenpaulharper stephenpaulharper https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=73921
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 778 posts since 4 Jul, 2005 from Atlanta
If I had to guess, I'd think that the new ESC will at least import into ST1 (as the older versions do). This brings up the question - are ST1 sounds compatible with ST2.1? I should think so, but that's probably a question for IK. Anybody know for sure? As long as I can import files into ST2.1, well, then export be damned. Can't really think of that many ST samples so unique that I'd really wanna export anyway.
What would really be cool would be if ESC can convert mulisample .wav files into ST format. ST has hard time with this from my experience, and it's a real hassle to rename files for a clean conversion, which is what IK suggests that you do.
Thoughts?
What would really be cool would be if ESC can convert mulisample .wav files into ST format. ST has hard time with this from my experience, and it's a real hassle to rename files for a clean conversion, which is what IK suggests that you do.
Thoughts?
-
- KVRAF
- 10815 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from UK
Hay chick peepz
i took you advice & downloaded the latest demo to check if it would convert my emuX files
no joy at all
Subz
i took you advice & downloaded the latest demo to check if it would convert my emuX files
no joy at all
Subz
-
- KVRist
- 446 posts since 24 Apr, 2002
ST 2 has some features in which it's MUCH easier to fit a multisample file, like a S-5000 program or SoundFont, into it. Most of it has to do with the ST1 requirement that all sounds on one key have the same tuning offsets, which often is the case.algodon wrote:This brings up the question - are ST1 sounds compatible with ST2.1? I should think so, but that's probably a question for IK. Anybody know for sure? As long as I can import files into ST2.1, well, then export be damned.
That's why it's better to convert into ST2, which is what Translator does, and does very well.
Are you talking about single .wav files that have multiple channels (like 6)?algodon wrote:What would really be cool would be if ESC can convert multisample .wav files into ST format.
Thoughts?
Last edited by chickeneps on Thu Feb 02, 2006 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
