KVR Audio

Sickle · Post by **Sickle** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:55 am

You're a waste of a good screen name.

Amberience · Post by **Amberience** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:06 am

Architeuthis wrote:
Sickle wrote:Nice backpedalling there, buddy.

uhh can you tell me what "backpedalling" would mean?

It would mean you're a f**king idiot for not turning down various knobs to see if they had any effect on the sound you're moaning about.

Jesus, reflections was all it was?? Fixed with a simple gain control

Architeuthis · Post by **Architeuthis** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:23 am

POST DELETED

Sickle · Post by **Sickle** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:40 am

Architeuthis wrote:thank me for testing it for you.

What the hell do we have to thank you for? Showing us all that you pass the

test?

In that case..

Gargoyle · Post by **Gargoyle** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:50 am

Architeuthis wrote:
Amberience wrote:It would mean you're a f**king idiot
Actually no, it was the round room that helped smoothen the reverb. With the hlep of A_Gruesome_D I was able to figure this out. I'm sure there are people who can learn form this thread. I've done well-documented testing for everyone.

Now, it's kind of funny how you sat back and watched the thread while you wondered how to solve the problem yourself. If you didn't want me wasting a good screen name, Argitoth shouldn't have been banned. And like I said, do some of your own tests if you want to confirm this or thank me for testing it for you.

Architeuthis, I think people's reaction is based on your (now heavily edited) intitial post where you basically slagged Rayspace off and said that it didn't sound good. I don't think you really encouraged anyone to step forward and assist you, because you started out that way.

There was no "problem" to solve with Rayspace - only a problem with how you were using it and what you were expecting from it (especially in comparison to a different reverb).

Probably time to move on...

Architeuthis · Post by **Architeuthis** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:58 am

yes.

forgive and forget.

The Chase · Post by **The Chase** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:28 am

rbet · Post by **rbet** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:35 am

Architeuthis wrote:but really, M'Snah has a better chord progression.

On topic note: I'm waiting for someone to confirm or dismiss my test results.

Did anyone notice M'Snah has too much DC Offset?

M'Snah · Post by **M'Snah** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:40 am

rbet wrote:
Architeuthis wrote:but really, M'Snah has a better chord progression.

On topic note: I'm waiting for someone to confirm or dismiss my test results.
Did anyone notice M'Snah has too much DC Offset?

I guess that's the reason why I only get involved in a thread after the discussion is already finished

rbet · Post by **rbet** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:43 am

Sorry bro, I just read it for the first time.

Baxter · Post by **Baxter** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:53 am

Any good reason why some of you RaySpace supporters and fans don't write a review of this soft? There are none to date in the review section, and I would like to know more about this effect, if possible.

Baxter

kmonkey · Post by **kmonkey** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:57 am

Architeuthis wrote:yes.

forgive and forget.

Maybe. But next time stick with "monkey see monkey do" technique before posting such crap about any thing

M'Snah · Post by **M'Snah** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:19 am

Baxter wrote:Any good reason why some of you RaySpace supporters and fans don't write a review of this soft? There are none to date in the review section, and I would like to know more about this effect, if possible.

Baxter

Same reason that many other products don't get reviews. We're lazy. And for me personally: I collect VST's, play with them, but I'm never a good match for the real experts. It would be like a Computer Music review: All the things they write, you can see for yourself when you look at the GUI and at the press release of a product

Architeuthis · Post by **Architeuthis** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:25 am

POST DELETED

stefancrs · Post by **stefancrs** » Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:33 am

I believe the main issue is that you don't want a simulation of a real space's reverbation. Why do you find the round room limiting? You can set it's size and whatnot, right?

If it gives you the kind of reverb you're after I don't see why you want to introduce corners in the room when you don't like the "sound of corners".

Deleted