New (or rather, very old :-) Synth in town
- KVRian
- 1283 posts since 10 Oct, 2002 from Barcelona
Ooops...
Does it mean that Logic doesn't support VST2.4...???
SDK2.3 version works fine.
Thanks!!!
Does it mean that Logic doesn't support VST2.4...???
SDK2.3 version works fine.
Thanks!!!
- KVRian
- 1283 posts since 10 Oct, 2002 from Barcelona
Gucky, just touch the numeric pad, it changes the presets.
-
- KVRAF
- 1905 posts since 26 Sep, 2004
Hi wikter,
thanks for your answer. But it is not my problem to change the presets. That can I do. But I want to load some of the banks that are on the homepage of Wavesim. And that works not for me.
Any idea?
thanks for your answer. But it is not my problem to change the presets. That can I do. But I want to load some of the banks that are on the homepage of Wavesim. And that works not for me.
Any idea?
- KVRian
- 1283 posts since 10 Oct, 2002 from Barcelona
Well... no idea at all, I've loaded them from the file menu, but I haven't really found a big difference between banks. MAybe tweaking, saving and comparing will show you the way.
- KVRian
- 1283 posts since 10 Oct, 2002 from Barcelona
...well, I've tested again and I've seen that some sounds on these banks are the same. I can notice a difference on timbres on initial presets, but I've found no difference around patch 20.
In fact, I've seen with chainer that it needs 12% of my cpu to make the Chip emulator work, and a cheaper 3% to reach the 8 voice limit... 15% using 8 voices.
In fact, I've seen with chainer that it needs 12% of my cpu to make the Chip emulator work, and a cheaper 3% to reach the 8 voice limit... 15% using 8 voices.
- KVRAF
- 7366 posts since 19 Apr, 2002 from Utah
So, would it be best to save patches (fxp's) rather than banks (fxb's), so that we can specifically use the patch we want in our host? (since it only auto loads to the first patch on default.)arakula wrote:Hehehe... gotchaChamomileShark wrote:Thanks arakula, you probably didn't see my edit..I found that the sound programdoesn't save in Cubase SX3, when the project comes back up it reverts to the first sound in the bank. I usually create my own presets and just hit store preset, that doesn't seem to work in Cubase..but I may not be using it correctly, it just acts differently to the other vsts i have.
Please keep in mind that this thing emulates a real synthesizer.
That means, it acts exactly like the original.
To store programs, you have to press the "DATAT" button (or move the cursor to the DTF: field on the PROGRAM panel with the <- and -> buttons) and enter "9" there. Then, press the PROGRAM button and enter a 2-digit program number where you want to store the program to. This tells the Wave to keep the current program at the given position.
As soon as you did that, it will be part of any .fxb file (or Cubase project) from now on. The data stored in the .fxb file contain a complete machine description - SRAM, EPROM, knob positions, ... the complete synthesizer.
As soon as you load a bank into the 2.2V6, it sets up the virtual machine - and then boots up with the new settings.
Yes, it really boots up... do you know what a PPG Wave does when it boots? It does tons of internal checks and initializations, and then it starts with PROG: 1. Always. It doesn't remember the current program. You have to send it as a MIDI program change (but please wait at least 2 seconds after loading - it currently doesn't like it very much if the MIDI UART receives data before it has been initialized...) or enter it manually.
By the way, thanks for this great program!!!!!!!
--Sean
-
- KVRAF
- 6596 posts since 21 Jun, 2004 from Secret Underground Hideout
i know it's a nostalgia thing, but will the other version options ,2.3 etc, sound less lofi? my experience with synths (beyond casios) is vsti, so i don't have much nostalgia. i do however like the sound of a moog. if this "old" tech could be made to sound that smooth, that would make an interesting plug. again, i know it's nostalgia, but changing presets is a pain
i'm bad and haven't read the thread. pardon me if i'm beatin a dead horse
i'm bad and haven't read the thread. pardon me if i'm beatin a dead horse
"Most people who experiment with drugs are not lying in the streets, suffocating on their own vomit. If you want to see some of that, go to the Pub on Saturday night at closing time." ozwest
-
- KVRAF
- 6596 posts since 21 Jun, 2004 from Secret Underground Hideout
even the large pic of the gui is hard to read.
i run out of notes quickly.
it seems nostalgia is holdin this synth hostage
i run out of notes quickly.
it seems nostalgia is holdin this synth hostage
"Most people who experiment with drugs are not lying in the streets, suffocating on their own vomit. If you want to see some of that, go to the Pub on Saturday night at closing time." ozwest
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1940 posts since 16 Aug, 2004 from Vienna, Austria
Depends.androidlove wrote:but will the other version options ,2.3 etc, sound less lofi?
As far as the internal wavetables go, no, since they all share the same wavetable EPROMs - which hold the wavetables in 8-bit format.
Using Waveterm C, however, generation of 12-bit wavetables is possible, which sound a bit less harsh.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1940 posts since 16 Aug, 2004 from Vienna, Austria
http://www.hermannseib.com/images/panel04.jpgandroidlove wrote:even the large pic of the gui is hard to read.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1940 posts since 16 Aug, 2004 from Vienna, Austria
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1940 posts since 16 Aug, 2004 from Vienna, Austria
Doesn't make any difference, since WaveSim exposes exactly one program, and that program contains a complete emulated machine. This emulated machine contains 100 internal programs, which are not directly accessible from the outside (i.e., selectable from the host); they can only be reached through MIDI messages (or by simulating the appropriate key presses through parameter automation, hee hee...).audiojunkie wrote:So, would it be best to save patches (fxp's) rather than banks (fxb's), so that we can specifically use the patch we want in our host? (since it only auto loads to the first patch on default.)
-
- KVRist
- 452 posts since 8 Jul, 2004
..now that it can be easily read..
does it really say "velosity sensor" under the display on the original?
does it really say "velosity sensor" under the display on the original?
- KVRian
- 1209 posts since 28 Jun, 2005
It does... on the waldorf it says CONRTOL in stead of CONTROL so..

It's not an emulation if there is no spelling error....

It's not an emulation if there is no spelling error....
