Something is coming from Softube

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

kritikon wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 7:39 pm More likely 3 is the total of 3 f**ks I could give about anything Softube. :party:
You beat me, by 3
How original

Post

Is it an emulation of this?

Image
How original

Post

If it's that wide and shorter black box, hopefully that will narrow it down to only a few 100 guesses. :hihi:
I had a Alesis Midiverb 4 and a D4 drum module that were nearly that size (but Softube just released a reverb). Also no power of 3 related to those.
It also looks slightly taller than those 2 modules.

Post

audiouser720 wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:16 pm Softube 3some
Hardtube :lol:
Eyeball exchanging
Soul calibrating ..frequencies

Post

seafire wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:25 pm Is it an emulation of this?

Image
An oldie but goodie.

Post

Triad Chorus was free for T-Racks 6 MAX users. Sounds pretty good to me so Softube's has to be...different/better.

Post

Lbdunequest wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 7:37 pm
Haptix wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 3:44 pm
Lbdunequest wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 3:34 pm Why are you so sure its an instrument?
Nobody is sure, we are merely doing countermarketing and telling them what they should do.
You are not telling them anything, especially just few days away from the release.

Counter marketing is just doing nothing and not reacting.

What you are doing is just spreading false information.
I have not even made any claims.
{"panic_string":"BAD MAGIC! :shrug: (flag set in iBoot panic header), no macOS panic log available"} "Apple did not respond to a request for comment."

Post

Niowiad wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 7:22 pm
Haptix wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:45 am
Niowiad wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:40 am Anyway, they got what they wanted, which is people talking about it pre-launch. :wheee:
Yes. We need to fight against these evil ways of marketing, and just stfu.
Oh FFS...
I even posted in this thread with my own guesses (which you left out of the quote) and "played the game".
Obviously they did it to build some pre-launch hype, which happens all the time with most developers, and it's perfectly fine.
I didn't mean to imply anything like what you wrote, but somehow you felt attacked.
Sorry about that.
Ah its me who feels attacked? Okey dokie.
{"panic_string":"BAD MAGIC! :shrug: (flag set in iBoot panic header), no macOS panic log available"} "Apple did not respond to a request for comment."

Post

Haptix wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 3:27 am
Niowiad wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 7:22 pm
Haptix wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:45 am
Niowiad wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:40 am Anyway, they got what they wanted, which is people talking about it pre-launch. :wheee:
Yes. We need to fight against these evil ways of marketing, and just stfu.
Oh FFS...
I even posted in this thread with my own guesses (which you left out of the quote) and "played the game".
Obviously they did it to build some pre-launch hype, which happens all the time with most developers, and it's perfectly fine.
I didn't mean to imply anything like what you wrote, but somehow you felt attacked.
Sorry about that.
Ah its me who feels attacked? Okey dokie.
Well yes, otherwise you wouldn't have replied in such bitchy way in the first place.

As I said, I even played along with the guessing game, and just pointed out at the end that this pre-launch teaser tactic basically works everytime by getting everyone curious (myself included, obviously, since I partecipated).

Think what you want, I'm fine either way after this.

Post

You can be creative in any right place on Earth, and not only in the wealthiest cities. Bring the world feelings from everywhere, and not only feelings of capitalistic or jail environment.
― Aleksey Vaneev


https://linuxdaw.org

Post

Perhaps it's a greatly expanded triple modulation effect (chorus, flanger, phaser).

Post

Niowiad wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 9:25 am
Haptix wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 3:27 am
Niowiad wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 7:22 pm
Haptix wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:45 am
Niowiad wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:40 am Anyway, they got what they wanted, which is people talking about it pre-launch. :wheee:
Yes. We need to fight against these evil ways of marketing, and just stfu.
Oh FFS...
I even posted in this thread with my own guesses (which you left out of the quote) and "played the game".
Obviously they did it to build some pre-launch hype, which happens all the time with most developers, and it's perfectly fine.
I didn't mean to imply anything like what you wrote, but somehow you felt attacked.
Sorry about that.
Ah its me who feels attacked? Okey dokie.
Well yes, otherwise you wouldn't have replied in such bitchy way in the first place.
..and it is still in the belief I am the one feels attacked..
{"panic_string":"BAD MAGIC! :shrug: (flag set in iBoot panic header), no macOS panic log available"} "Apple did not respond to a request for comment."

Post

100% the Tri-Chorus. The contracts with NI (compressors), then UAD (Vocoder, for example) all have an "end date" where Softube can release the stuff through themselves natively. I assume this is going to be exactly as it was with Vocoder - the exact same plugin, but made to work natively. Maybe they'll touch up the UI, but the algo will be the same guaranteed.

Anyway, as a chorus-obsessed person, my favourite (which I never bought) was the Sonsig Ace Chorus, but I really enjoy GEM Mod by Overloud (one of the best freebies of all time), AX Chorus (also a great freebie), and MicroShift (which is not a chorus, but can sound close). I hope this sounds better than all of these, so I can end my "best chorus" search. I liked the UAD demos.

The price will probably be relatively high. Something like $89 not on sale and $59 intro pricing.

Post

Niowiad wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 9:25 am
Haptix wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 3:27 am
Niowiad wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 7:22 pm
Haptix wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:45 am
Niowiad wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:40 am Anyway, they got what they wanted, which is people talking about it pre-launch. :wheee:
Yes. We need to fight against these evil ways of marketing, and just stfu.
Oh FFS...
I even posted in this thread with my own guesses (which you left out of the quote) and "played the game".
Obviously they did it to build some pre-launch hype, which happens all the time with most developers, and it's perfectly fine.
I didn't mean to imply anything like what you wrote, but somehow you felt attacked.
Sorry about that.
Ah its me who feels attacked? Okey dokie.
Well yes, otherwise you wouldn't have replied in such bitchy way in the first place.

As I said, I even played along with the guessing game, and just pointed out at the end that this pre-launch teaser tactic basically works everytime by getting everyone curious (myself included, obviously, since I partecipated).

Think what you want, I'm fine either way after this.
I think it was just to be taken in the 2nd degree and he was just joking with you, not against you.

Post

Haptix wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 9:45 am
Niowiad wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 9:25 am
Haptix wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 3:27 am
Niowiad wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 7:22 pm
Haptix wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:45 am
Niowiad wrote: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:40 am Anyway, they got what they wanted, which is people talking about it pre-launch. :wheee:
Yes. We need to fight against these evil ways of marketing, and just stfu.
Oh FFS...
I even posted in this thread with my own guesses (which you left out of the quote) and "played the game".
Obviously they did it to build some pre-launch hype, which happens all the time with most developers, and it's perfectly fine.
I didn't mean to imply anything like what you wrote, but somehow you felt attacked.
Sorry about that.
Ah its me who feels attacked? Okey dokie.
Well yes, otherwise you wouldn't have replied in such bitchy way in the first place.
..and it is still in the belief I am the one feels attacked..
And you just got me again into writing :dog:
It's extremely rare for me to get into any kind of argument with anyone, but here we are...

Dude... you're trying to turn the tables playing the "u mad" meme, deflecting from the main point, which was your first annoyed sarcastic reply, which you wouldn't have had any need to write if you didn't feel attacked first, as the OP in this thread.

Only in response to that, I clearly got on the defensive "because I felt attacked", which is where you're trying to get with this "u mad" trolling approach.
But this doesn't change the fact that this whole stupid argument originated from your annoyed reply pushing back against literally nothing.

Hope this clears it up for everyone. I'll try my best not to engage any further.


Jac459 wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 11:13 am I think it was just to be taken in the 2nd degree and he was just joking with you, not against you.
Yeah it could always be it.
Although I would have expected to have that pointed out in the next replies, rather than deflection and "u mad" trolling, which makes me think otherwise.

Really it doesn't matter, it shouldn't matter.
It even goes against my goal about getting below 0.3 post-per-day average :neutral:

Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”