Arturia Jup-8000 V
- Banned
- 3197 posts since 23 Jan, 2022
i tried the demo, the new arp is fantastic, the sequencer is very nice, i love the drag and drop modulation, the sound is not your typical fat analog, it is kind of glossy and clean, i was able to make some nice pads, overall very good instrument, easy to program, the UI is super
aliasing plugin owner

- KVRAF
- 1797 posts since 3 May, 2023 from Norway
Hi 
FL Studio 25 | AudioThing JULY - Deimos - U-he Filterscape - NI Kontour - Softube Model 80 - LUSH-2 - UAD Opal - WaveOSC
- KVRAF
- 18511 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
I wonder about the wisdom of developing an emulation like this, unless you can perfectly nail down the sound of the original, AND add on a few cool features. The die hard fans are never going to be satisfied with anything but the original. Casual fans are already happy with modern tools that do similar things.
So who is this for? Seems like the market is pretty tiny, unless those being critical of how far it sounds from the original are just suffering from confirmation bias. I personally don’t have any nostalgia for the 8000, and the additional features don’t really excite me.
So who is this for? Seems like the market is pretty tiny, unless those being critical of how far it sounds from the original are just suffering from confirmation bias. I personally don’t have any nostalgia for the 8000, and the additional features don’t really excite me.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- KVRAF
- 4276 posts since 1 Sep, 2016
I own a ton of emulations but have only actually played a handful of real synths, so I tend to judge the sound mostly on its own merits and don't really care if it's not a 100% accurate emulation. GUI and workflow are important to me, so if I don't like the feel of using something then I won't use it, even if I like the sound of it.
I find the slide-out interface on this quite annoying because it slides out from the bottom, forcing part of it off the screen. On my other Arturia synths it slides out from the top, giving me full easy access without having to scroll and fiddle around with the GUI.
Give me tabs instead of this clunky slide-out shiz.
I find the slide-out interface on this quite annoying because it slides out from the bottom, forcing part of it off the screen. On my other Arturia synths it slides out from the top, giving me full easy access without having to scroll and fiddle around with the GUI.
Give me tabs instead of this clunky slide-out shiz.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 281 posts since 4 Apr, 2014
Well, presets are trancy, but this instrument can do a lot more!telecharge wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:18 pmThat's a nice testimonial. You have convinced me to demo. I have Arturia's Analog Lab Pro, and the presets there for the Jup-8000 V did not catch my ear as anything out of the ordinary.frag wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 4:06 pmI don't think it's just my enthusiasm...telecharge wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 2:48 pmYour enthusiasm might be clouding your perspective, but I'm glad you're stoked.frag wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 1:48 pm I'm telling you, there will be lots of presets for this VSTi - similar to Spire, Diva etc.
This synth is capable of a wide range of sounds - trance, rock, Bach, whatever you want. It's not as "shiny" as Spire or Virus TI2. For the same reason I prefer Virus C over TI2.
It complements Spire or Diva, because it offers something unique.
If you listen Monopoly carefully, it also goes for this "early VA" sound, and it works. For this reason, I also prefer Triton over newer sample-based synths. It's a bit dirty.
I'd say it's sweet spot between true analog and contemporary VA.
It's all subjective, but not completely subjective
I mean, I don't think anyone ever said that Steinberg Neon is the best synth.
Virtual instruments have progressed so much... In the late 90s I remember VAZ, Model E, etc, it was silly and everybody wanted JP, Virus, Nord.
Today we have all of this stuff in VST. I don't even use Virus TI2.
Whoever is into music making likes to try (and own) lots of synths, but I think it's important to limit yourself - that's what makes great authors. For example, if I get that Ultra 9 285K which I really like for DAW, I would install only six instruments: Spire, Diva, Triton/Extreme, Multipoly, Jup-8000 V and JD-800. Everything else is a distraction. Even six is too much!
Out of hundreds, or even thousands, these are the only instruments which make me want to play music and say something. Multipoly and Jup-8000 V are great additions, particularly Jup-8000 V. This has been missing.
-
- KVRAF
- 2940 posts since 24 Nov, 2023
I have nostalgia for the 8000 but not for Supersaw or trance timbres. Roland marketed it back in the day as a digital Jupiter 8 with a few extras. Just as the TB-303 ended up being used heavily in Acid which Roland never intended the JP-8000 ended up being used in Trancezerocrossing wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 6:02 pm I wonder about the wisdom of developing an emulation like this, unless you can perfectly nail down the sound of the original, AND add on a few cool features. The die hard fans are never going to be satisfied with anything but the original. Casual fans are already happy with modern tools that do similar things.
So who is this for? Seems like the market is pretty tiny, unless those being critical of how far it sounds from the original are just suffering from confirmation bias. I personally don’t have any nostalgia for the 8000, and the additional features don’t really excite me.
The Arturia Jup-8000 V seems to really miss the mark of sounding like a Digital Jupiter 8 in the way that the JP-8000 did
Of course Arturia already makes a digital Jupiter 8 which I own, and since I don't care about trance sounds and have dozens of plugins that can do Supersaws I have no interest at all in ths
- KVRAF
- 1787 posts since 22 Feb, 2014
Well, now you have me installing Roland Anthology 1993 (JD-990). It's only 6.5GB.
-
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRAF
- 9694 posts since 5 Aug, 2009
maybe a bit interesting, found on youtube
DAW FL Studio Audio Interface Focusrite Scarlett 1st Gen 2i2 CPU Intel i7-7700K 4.20 GHz, RAM 32 GB Dual-Channel DDR4 @2400MHz Corsair Vengeance. MB Asus Prime Z270-K, GPU Gainward 1070 GTX GS 8GB NT Be Quiet DP 550W OS Win10 64Bit
-
- KVRist
- 231 posts since 11 Apr, 2006
C-quence wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:37 pmYes, seems like they've refactored components from Pigments into a new UI. Smart!Lbdunequest wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 12:32 pm Ive just compared Pigments super unison algorithm in VA osc - its the same as supersaw in jup 8000.
Smart and kinda annoys me, like, this kinda what I was wondering...what is actually being emulated here? If it's just copy paste w a new UI...that feels dishonest to me but whatever
-
- KVRAF
- 2940 posts since 24 Nov, 2023
Pure Lofi is most definitely just a reskinned Pigments alsoZoopy wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 9:10 pmC-quence wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:37 pmYes, seems like they've refactored components from Pigments into a new UI. Smart!Lbdunequest wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 12:32 pm Ive just compared Pigments super unison algorithm in VA osc - its the same as supersaw in jup 8000.
Smart and kinda annoys me, like, this kinda what I was wondering...what is actually being emulated here? If it's just copy paste w a new UI...that feels dishonest to me but whatever
-
- KVRist
- 179 posts since 23 Mar, 2025
I would prefer that Arturia (and others) integrate new synth parameters into the main GUI rather than hide them behind an "Advanced" panel, even if that panel slides down from the top. (This is what u-he has done with Repro.) Any parameters that can't be neatly integrated into the main GUI should be placed on one or more additional tabs.Vortifex wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 6:18 pm I find the slide-out interface on this quite annoying because it slides out from the bottom, forcing part of it off the screen. On my other Arturia synths it slides out from the top, giving me full easy access without having to scroll and fiddle around with the GUI.
Give me tabs instead of this clunky slide-out shiz.
Of course, if your monitor is large enough, the main GUI and advanced panel can be shown simultaneously. But I often work on my laptop, so a tabbed interface works better for me.
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 12512 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
User name does NOT check out. No hyperbole here.Hyperbole wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 11:16 pm I would prefer that Arturia (and others) integrate new synth parameters into the main GUI rather than hide them behind an "Advanced" panel, even if that panel slides down from the top. (This is what u-he has done with Repro.) Any parameters that can't be neatly integrated into the main GUI should be placed on one or more additional tabs.
Of course, if your monitor is large enough, the main GUI and advanced panel can be shown simultaneously. But I often work on my laptop, so a tabbed interface works better for me.
I don't know how they came to the conclusion that making the GUI taller is better than tabs. It's pretty terrible IMO.
-
- KVRist
- 179 posts since 23 Mar, 2025
That might be the case with emulations of analog filters. But the JP8000 already has a fairly harsh, grainy digital filter sound. So even if Arturia completely nailed it, the filter would still sound harsh by today's standards. I think what you are hearing just is the gritty digital sound of the JP8000. There is a reason I returned mine after two weeks in 1997.Passante wrote: Sat Apr 26, 2025 3:30 pm It just sounds harsh, I don't know what is wrong with people who're excited about it.
I suppose those who're into SynthWave won't be bothered.
I notice this with most plugin emulations. They hold on until you start moving things around, messing with the filter etc...
It seems to me like the "resolution" of the filters in plugins is "smaller" if this makes any sense. It's like...it's skipping some dots, as if the bit depth is lower.
Plugin manufacturers wanna optimize CPU so they cut corners, and it seems to me they focus on the filter specifically to save up CPU, which in return degrades the fidelity and as a result the original intent of making a convincing emulation is being lost.
