Which is better? Analogue clock or digital clock.
There's only one way to find out
I was waiting for that.seismic1 wrote:But have you addressed the real issue here?
Which is better? Analogue clock or digital clock.
There's only one way to find out
So who will provide the first null test?seismic1 wrote:I saw it about 4 or 5 hours ago, but wanted to give somebody else a chance. Must be a slow day
Wow. It took me 10 minutes to get to grips with Windows 7 basics and I'd never ever used it before. I had to set up a few things on an old timer's PC and I actually enjoyed the slight challenge of using Windows 7. It's Windows. There's a fundamental UI logic. If you can use Win XP, Windows 7 is easy.IncarnateX wrote:Really? Could have fooled me with that patronising attitude. Shifting to new systems is a pain all of us know and maybe you should try to read "a glimpse in the eyes" into the OP. You might catch some self-irony then instead of reasons to turn hostile.chokehold wrote: I don't mean to pick a fight.
I'm really just now diving deeply into tweaking Win-7, having put in-depth-tweaking off until moving more than one machine to it, and having the time to do it. I basically hate it... the "look" - the "feel" - the 'dumbed-down' everything.mandolarian wrote:Ok, so you don't like the new (but now old) Win7 shell. I get that. But, WTF were you doing using Windows Exploder in XP anyways? There were and are better options. Here's a shortlist:
xplorer2
or
XYPLORER
or
Total Commander
And WinExp helpers:
Folder Jump
Or
Listary
And
Launchy
And desktop cleanup:
Fences
or
Tiles
Goodbye clock, hello, Rainmeter
And you dinna need to hack the registry to change *multiple* default program options/actions with, Default Program Editor
This is a tiny shortlist of custom tweaks that YOU can make. To Win 7. To match YOUR habits and tastes.
My gawd, man, the beauty of Windows is that you could and still can tweak it to be YOUR Windows, not some dull grey myopic vision from a pathetic UI committee afraid of their place on the Redmond campus.
However, if XP's limitations are your liberation then get it back with a XP Theme
or for real, virtually, with: Virtual PC
Time get off your whine and spend some tweaking time. It's a Personal Computer. So, why not make it personal?
Mushy Mushy wrote:And to think I used to like you Hibidyhibidy wrote:
I smile every time I turn on my computer. I've loved win7x64 from the first RC. It's like the slinky in those geico commercials......."this is awesome"
Yep, entirely serious.![]()
PS: I hope you choke on that popcorn
LOL... it is def a "file-cabinet' hold-over, yes. When I am "holding" them, I do likewise.koolkeys wrote:I don't know, I often carry folders with me, and I always open them like a book. If they aren't in a file cabinet, it seems the logical choice.
Brent
WOW! How unrelated to a quote can a post be? What you write has absolutely nothing to do with the attitude of chokehold. If you just want to tell how easy it was for you to shift to windows 7, just write it. You don't have to look for fragments in others post, take them out of context and use as and excuse for whatever you want to say.audiobot202 wrote:Wow. It took me 10 minutes to get to grips with Windows 7 basics and I'd never ever used it before. I had to set up a few things on an old timer's PC and I actually enjoyed the slight challenge of using Windows 7. It's Windows. There's a fundamental UI logic. If you can use Win XP, Windows 7 is easy.IncarnateX wrote:Really? Could have fooled me with that patronising attitude. Shifting to new systems is a pain all of us know and maybe you should try to read "a glimpse in the eyes" into the OP. You might catch some self-irony then instead of reasons to turn hostile.chokehold wrote: I don't mean to pick a fight.
Windows 8 is another beast altogether. That's where some of the UI logic gets broken.
Win XP was great in its day, but its day is over. It's nowhere near as efficient as Win 7 when it comes to newer (most of the are getting on now anyway) technologies and specs.
I hear you. Years of highly developed muscle memory reduced to shoot, swear, aim, point, hunt, click, pout.Mushy Mushy wrote:Very valid points.mandolarian wrote:Lots of useful things
I suppose i'm just very familiar with XP and can fly around it.
Which is half the reason why i'm annoyed really.
On the busiest day of the month instead of instinctively clicking here and there I needed to think about how to do every single little thing. Just leaving work now after a 14 hour day. Under XP (only because of the familiarity) I think I would have been done 4 hours earlier.
So to your point, yes i'm sure those tools are brilliant but i'd still have to learn them and I doubt they'd be as quick as I am doing familiar tasks. That sounds a lot like bragging, but it's really not meant to. I'm sure next to a few of you i'm positively a turtle.
OH BOO HOOIncarnateX wrote:WOW! How unrelated to a quote can a post be? What you write has absolutely nothing to do with the attitude of chokehold. If you just want to tell how easy it was for you to shift to windows 7, just write it. You don't have to look for fragments in others post, take them out of context and use as and excuse for whatever you want to say.audiobot202 wrote:Wow. It took me 10 minutes to get to grips with Windows 7 basics and I'd never ever used it before. I had to set up a few things on an old timer's PC and I actually enjoyed the slight challenge of using Windows 7. It's Windows. There's a fundamental UI logic. If you can use Win XP, Windows 7 is easy.IncarnateX wrote:Really? Could have fooled me with that patronising attitude. Shifting to new systems is a pain all of us know and maybe you should try to read "a glimpse in the eyes" into the OP. You might catch some self-irony then instead of reasons to turn hostile.chokehold wrote: I don't mean to pick a fight.
Windows 8 is another beast altogether. That's where some of the UI logic gets broken.
Win XP was great in its day, but its day is over. It's nowhere near as efficient as Win 7 when it comes to newer (most of the are getting on now anyway) technologies and specs.
Idiot! Creep back behind the stone you came from slime-thing.audiobot202 wrote:
OH BOO HOO
*RAWR* (That's my slime voice)IncarnateX wrote:Idiot! Creep back behind the stone you came from slime-thing.audiobot202 wrote:
OH BOO HOO
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026