FL Studio 12.3 Official Release

[camsr]

Would I really have to log in to the fantastically crummy FL Looptalk forum to suggest this:
Please make background pane colors adjustable, the new ones cause me eye-strain.
Does anyone know what address to hex edit to change FL's eyeball-popping background colors?

This is why the corporate response is always:

DAW Guy (with tie) "Thank you for your input. Your feedback is important to us, I have passed it onto the development team. We will carefully consider your input and take it into account for future updates"

While in the background, the suggestion is sent to the trash can.

Anyhow. If you really want to make constructive suggestions and be involved in the future development of FL Studio, then please use Looptalk. 12.3 included a bunch of stuff suggested during the last beta stages.

[tooneba]

phpBB crummy? I think there are few popular board software. vBulettin and phpBB. How can people not handle forum software in 2016?

[Image-Line]

Would I really have to log in to the fantastically crummy FL Looptalk forum to suggest this:]

I am not sure if you are serious. Here is what Looptalk looks like these days:





Re your 'suggestion' it doesn't make sense. 1. Backgrounds are not 'new'. 2. have always been under user control. 3. There is no-way the defaults 'hurt' anyones eyes. 4. They are certainly not " eyeball-popping background colors":



...its like an explosion in the army paint-store.

[Image-Line]

phpBB crummy? I think there are few popular board software. vBulettin and phpBB. How can people not handle forum software in 2016?

...and use phpBB here to do so.

People, if you are going to troll, at least construct an internally consistent farce.

The complaints in this thread has become ludicrous. Except concerns about OS X VST plugins, I am working on that

Regards Scott

[gentleclockdivider]

The filters in the sampler instrument are there since Fruit lOOps 3.0 ----> maybe it's time to update the filters ?

Why?

I can not believe you ask this question . , why ?
Because they sound like poop.

This really shows the whole policy , you or rather the I.L crew decide whether something needs to be updated or not .

Then as an alternative you sum up some effect filters ,
You do know the difference between a polyphonic filter ( like in the sampler nstrument ) and stereo phonic filters as in EFFECTs ?
So your suggestion is not relevant at ll .

An no I am not trolling , I am just pointing some things out which have been there since the beginning .

Zoom level is stil dependent on PPQN ..is this considered trolling ?


You guys could learn a bit from the renoise community ...
We asked for new polyphonic filters , and the lovely developers gave us new zdf filters .Bam .

I am a happy renoise/reaper user ...I just give my opinion on some of fl studio's weaker points , that's all

[Image-Line]

The filters in the sampler instrument are there since Fruit lOOps 3.0 ----> maybe it's time to update the filters ?

Why?

I can not believe you ask this question . , why ?
Because they sound like poop.

You assert the fl studio filters sound like 'poop' and you are:

1. Not actually using FL Studio.
2. Can't demonstrate with any concrete audio example what you are talking about.
3. Are not being constructive. Nor do you really want to be.
4. Using pejorative language.
5. Ignoring responses and questions.
6. Don't show an understanding of the current state of FL Studio.
7. Posting your opinion/assertions as fact

You are trolling.

Regards Scott

[ATN69]

Hi Scott.

Did Image Line ever consider to have changeable background color? I am not saying it's bad now but some times I felt it would be great to have a light colored background. I got to the Point in my Life when I need to use glasses when ever I work with a computer and contrast is getting more interesting. Yeah, I am getting old

Cheers!

[Image-Line]

Hi Scott.

Did Image Line ever consider to have changeable background color? I am not saying it's bad now but some times I felt it would be great to have a light colored background. I got to the Point in my Life when I need to use glasses when ever I work with a computer and contrast is getting more interesting. Yeah, I am getting old

Cheers!

Which background are you referring to?

You can change the desktop and editors as you like

As for overall GUI shading, we are looking to unlock this for a future update and provide themes. Possibly FL Studio 13, but no promises.

Please use Looptalk for these sorts of discussions BTW

http://forum.image-line.com/viewforum.php?f=100

Regards Scott

[ATN69]

@Scott. Maybe I missed something but I only found I can change themes but the color is the same blue. I have been checking if I can change that blue standard color but so far I didn't find any way to do it. I will check out Looptalk.

Thanks!
/ Anders.T

[Image-Line]

@Scott. Maybe I missed something but I only found I can change themes but the color is the same blue. I have been checking if I can change that blue standard color but so far I didn't find any way to do it. I will check out Looptalk.

Thanks!
/ Anders.T

Please check this post in Looptalk

[incubus]

I think someone needs to "step away from the chalupa" (do they have taco bell in Belgium? )

Anyhoo, as it turns out the number one reason for all my audio recording troubles is that for whatever reason, I missed the fact that you have to left-click the master or it will simply keep recording w/o track assignment. Actually, there are times when I'd want to do that so it's nice to know I have options.

Thanks to everyone for their help, I really do feel that under the "GURU" video series there should be a step by step tut from that guy. Those are really good vids most of the time.

[Image-Line]

Thanks to everyone for their help, I really do feel that under the "GURU" video series there should be a step by step tut from that guy. Those are really good vids most of the time.

Well that's me.

It is time to update all the basics now we have the new GUI.

Regards Scott

[incubus]

Ah. Well, I never said I was the sharpest tool in the shed. Anyways, thanks.

[gentleclockdivider]

The filters in the sampler instrument are there since Fruit lOOps 3.0 ----> maybe it's time to update the filters ?

Why?

I can not believe you ask this question . , why ?
Because they sound like poop.

You assert the fl studio filters sound like 'poop' and you are:

1. Not actually using FL Studio.
2. Can't demonstrate with any concrete audio example what you are talking about.
3. Are not being constructive. Nor do you really want to be.
4. Using pejorative language.
5. Ignoring responses and questions.
6. Don't show an understanding of the current state of FL Studio.
7. Posting your opinion/assertions as fact

You are trolling.

Regards Scott

1.Been On/off demo using since 3.0 ---I know fl studio inside out
2.You wan' t me to prove that the sampler filter sound bad , I can't because it's a subjective matter .
My opinions are not facts , but the filters are old = fact .
Ableton upgraded their filters , renoise upgraded their filter algoritms simply because filter dsp technology has made quantum leaps over the last several years .
You are just ignoring that = fact .
The Upgrade disaster you mention can be avoided by a simple upgrade switch/button





Zoom level in song editor is dependent on ppqn = fact , you kept silent about this one for a reason didn't you ?

Fl studio is a great program , but some parts need upgrading ...
The gui is updated because I.L. thought it was time to do so , so why not the filters ?

Could you elaborate as to why the Zoom Level is still ppqn dependent ?

Thanks


Sincerely yours

Gentleclockdivider

[Image-Line]

Zoom level in song editor is dependent on ppqn = fact , you kept silent about this one for a reason didn't you ?
Could you elaborate as to why the Zoom Level is still ppqn dependent ?

I have started a thread comparing 'old' Filters with 'new' ZDF designs, with audio examples. I don't hear any magic in ZDF filters. Old does not mean bad. New does not mean better. Most advances in DSP have to do with real-time processing efficiency not audio quality. The principles of filter designs have been long established (in mathematics, most of it before real-time DSP was even possible). I invite you to continue the discussion here:

Looptalk ZDF Filter Comparison

Playlist zoom is linked to PPQ because slicing and Automation Clip control-point placement (by design) is quantized to PPQ. The Playlist only Zooms far enough to allow accurate placement of events and slices at the current PPQ. Allowing higher zoom is a false promise and people will wonder why their cursor jumps over so much data.

Will the Playlist always work this way? No.

Regards Scott