TrackGleam browser mastering - looking for producer feedback

[trackgleam]

AUTO-ADMIN: Non-MP3, WAV, OGG, SoundCloud, YouTube, Vimeo, Twitter and Facebook links in this post have been protected automatically. Once the member reaches 5 posts the links will function as normal.

TrackGleam - private browser-based mastering

Hi everyone,

I have been working on TrackGleam, a browser-based mastering application, and would value feedback from producers here. Processing happens locally in the browser rather than uploading the track to a server.

Fast mastering workflow

• Multiple mastering styles, including streaming-ready, punchy, warm, bright, wide, loud, and natural
• Selectable intensity and loudness targets
• Streaming-ready WAV and MP3 export
• No account required for the standard workflow

Advanced analysis and controls

• Integrated LUFS and true-peak metering
• Loudness range and crest-factor analysis for dynamics
• Stereo-width measurement and mono-risk detection
• Artifact-risk analysis before export
• Tuned EQ with bass-heavy and punchy correction
• Fine control over tone, dynamics, width, and final level
• Reference-track matching for tone and loudness
• Original, mastered, and streaming-normalized comparison modes

These tools make TrackGleam useful beyond one-click mastering: you can inspect what is happening, compare versions, and shape the result before downloading it.

Try it
Open TrackGleam (https://trackgleam.com)

KVR product page
View TrackGleam on KVR

---

Feedback I would especially appreciate

• How well do the results translate across different genres?
• Do the advanced controls provide enough useful adjustment?
• How accurate are the loudness, stereo, and artifact-risk indicators on your material?
• Where does the reference matching need improvement?

Thanks for taking a look.