First: You need to calm down.Dullee wrote:it's the second time I see you use the word "we", speaking as if you was some collective and not just one guy. I told you, there is no "we". you may not talk for other people. "you don't want, you don't need something" - it's just you. you don't want Minimoog iOS app ported to desktop, you don't want P-600 synth from Synapse Audio... you talk as if the developers were working for you, making only the synthesizers you want. and it's not the case, as we all know. so hold your horses, will ya, and cut the "we" word. there is no "we".I wasn't aware of this mod. Seems to greatly improve the original, but even so, I think that the Prophet-600 will not bring more to the table than what we already have. It's "another" relatively simple subtractive synth - Not my cup of tea.
Second: It was ME who wrote that, not the guy you are addressing to (chk071). But feel free to address this to me.
Third: There may always be a WE, since in a vast auditory like this it's unlikely that no one would agree with me. But that's my opinion, of course. Anyway, I think I can use the pronoun WE, as it is a common way to address this kind of thinking (its called generalization). Of course, generalizations are sometimes dangerous, and I may be wrong in my statement. It's up to you to prove I'm wrong in my generalization.
I admit that the OB-8 may have a few more parameters, but doesn't make that much difference. That said, I also see no reason to not take the extra step, and recreate the OB-8 together with the OB-Xa, since they are so similar. 
