Why torment yourself with other systems after all?) If we have 10, then yes, the estimates will be more accurate, but still 1-2/10 will be equal to 1/5, and you are even unlikely to dare to put someone 3/10, because... The" problem " of OSC (actually its a great blessing of OSC! ) the fact that nobody doesn't write terrible music here! With all the variety, from popular genres of different times to absolutely experimental works, everyone here, even beginners, manages to keep the bar high! Well, yes, someone should be in the last places (as I was in the beginning ), but you support these "recruits", and then, after missing a couple of months, you look at the next results and see them above many old names! It's just an unrealistically high level of quality and talent in this place, that's all! In fact, for me there are grades 3-5, for a long time I have not heard a work for 2 points and... THIS IS JUST A REASON FOR JOY AND PRIDE FOR US!Taron wrote: ↑Mon Feb 15, 2021 9:00 pm Sometimes that happens, doesn't it. I initially felt like my vote wouldn't help one bit, because of all the 5s. So I went through it one more time and still, I just couldn't lower so many of them. Then I went hyper critical and started spreading carefully, whilst still having felt somewhat obligated not to change a few 5er for various reasons. There were, however, actually 2 2s, not as punishment , but simply because they would've destroyed any justification for the 3s... as weird as that may sound. A system of 5 slots just really is hard, because the results could get so misunderstood. At the end, though...with anything around or near 60 tracks, the whole process is quite exhausting and it might be a blessing to only have 5 ratings (really 4). I still think there should be a "null" slot for the artists own track, then we would at least have all 5 slots for rating.
P.S. Someone needs to take my bag with exclamation marks and limit my time for writing posts! I can't control myself...