Ring modulator with 2 inputs?
- KVRAF
- 2548 posts since 7 Jul, 2003 from Huntington, WV
I'm looking for a free ring modulator plugin which accepts two channels of external audio input and ring modulates those signals. I'm not looking for the more common effect (for VST plugins) of a single external audio input modulating, or being modulated by, an internal oscillator.
Does this exist in freeware?
thanks,
McLilith
Does this exist in freeware?
thanks,
McLilith
-
- KVRAF
- 2460 posts since 3 Oct, 2002 from SF CA USA NA Earth
It's a builtin contraption in Audiomulch.McLilith wrote:I'm looking for a free ring modulator plugin which accepts two channels of external audio input and ring modulates those signals.
Try this one
Tiny God will also produce one in the next 3 months as part of the TinyFX suite.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2548 posts since 7 Jul, 2003 from Huntington, WV
Thanks. That's what I decided to do.jtxx000 wrote:it should be a piece of cake to make in synthedit if it doesn't already exist.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2548 posts since 7 Jul, 2003 from Huntington, WV
I tried your link, but I couldn't find an actual download link. For now, I'll make something in SynthEdit. The TinyFX series sounds interesting. It would be cool to have an optimized, low-cpu ring modulator with two audio inputs.Borogove wrote: Try this one
take care,
McLilith
-
- KVRAF
- 2460 posts since 3 Oct, 2002 from SF CA USA NA Earth
-
- KVRAF
- 6937 posts since 4 Jun, 2004 from Utrecht, Holland
<This thread> contains a link to the scheme of a hardware passive ring modulator. I'm surprised nobody has built a VST version (well, its not in the KVR database anyway.)
I'm tempted to have a go at it in SE (first project!) but don't hold your breath...
I'm tempted to have a go at it in SE (first project!) but don't hold your breath...
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2548 posts since 7 Jul, 2003 from Huntington, WV
I was thinking "optimized" compared to a synthedit implementation.Borogove wrote:There's not really much there you can optimize.McLilith wrote:It would be cool to have an optimized, low-cpu ring modulator with two audio inputs.
Two stereo inputs and one stereo output would be cool, but I could always use two instances of a mono unit to get stereo. In fact, that's what I'm doing now. I created a mono unit in SynthEdit and it seems to work okay.Borogove wrote:Are you after two stereo inputs to one stereo output, or two mono inputs to one mono output?
I'm really surprised that no one has released a basic ring modulator like this before. I'm having fun ring modulating the outputs of two VSTi plugins, to get a funky hybrid of the two. Of course, polyphony isn't very practical with this setup.
take care,
McLilith
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2548 posts since 7 Jul, 2003 from Huntington, WV
The ring modulator you speak of has a fair amount of flaws. Some people happen to like the character of those flaws, but it's not for everyone.C00kie wrote:<This thread> contains a link to the scheme of a hardware passive ring modulator. I'm surprised nobody has built a VST version (well, its not in the KVR database anyway.)
I was after a more perfect ring modulator function. I don't care about modeling the deficiencies and quirks of diodes and transformers. If I built a hardware unit, I would probably use the latest and greatest chip from Analog Devices, instead of diodes and transformers. My Chroma Polaris has a funky "ring modulator" made with digital logic--it really isn't a ring modulator in the traditional sense at all. I've been wanting to play with a more traditional, and much more accurate ring modulator, for awhile now.
take care,
McLilith
-
- KVRAF
- 4692 posts since 28 Jan, 2003 from In these very interwebs
Borogove wrote:There's not really much there you can optimize.McLilith wrote:It would be cool to have an optimized, low-cpu ring modulator with two audio inputs.
Forever,
Kim.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2548 posts since 7 Jul, 2003 from Huntington, WV
Okay, laugh it up. Like I tried to say, I was thinking of a plugin that didn't have any of the overhead that a SynthEdit plugin would almost certainly have. I wasn't thinking of optimizing the multiplication--just cutting out any uneeded SynthEdit baggage.Jeez wrote:You can't really get much simpler than a single multiplication per sample. The only simpler DSP process I can think of is gain.
Keep on laughing though, it's good for you. Just realize though, you're the one who didn't understand the situation.
McLilith
-
- KVRAF
- 12235 posts since 18 Aug, 2003
For a simple but effective mono solution, checkout Subminimal's Konstrux collection.
The operator plugin does simple two input math functions, one of which is multiplication. Voila, a no-CPU mono ringmod. That said, an SE plugin just designed to do it shouldn't really have that much in the way of overhead anyway, just a slightly higher filesize. For simple functions the SE shell is fairly well optimized. And in SE you could make a stereo one with gain control.
Cheers,
Steve
The operator plugin does simple two input math functions, one of which is multiplication. Voila, a no-CPU mono ringmod. That said, an SE plugin just designed to do it shouldn't really have that much in the way of overhead anyway, just a slightly higher filesize. For simple functions the SE shell is fairly well optimized. And in SE you could make a stereo one with gain control.
Cheers,
Steve
-
- KVRAF
- 2460 posts since 3 Oct, 2002 from SF CA USA NA Earth
You using a modular host? (EXT, Bidule?) Four input ports (2 stereo pairs) confuses a lot of hosts.McLilith wrote: Two stereo inputs and one stereo output would be cool, but I could always use two instances of a mono unit to get stereo.
Easy there, tiger. SynthEdit shouldn't add any measurable overhead in this case assuming it has a "multiply two signals" module, is our point.McLilith wrote:Like I tried to say, I was thinking of a plugin that didn't have any of the overhead that a SynthEdit plugin would almost certainly have. I wasn't thinking of optimizing the multiplication--just cutting out any uneeded SynthEdit baggage.
Keep on laughing though, it's good for you. Just realize though, you're the one who didn't understand the situation.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2548 posts since 7 Jul, 2003 from Huntington, WV
I'm using Tracktion, and I can put two mono processors into a rack filter (it's kind of a modular thing) and then use the composite as if it were a single plugin. (I'm also putting two VSTi plugins inside this composite, which serve as the signal sources.) I created a mono ring modulator VST in SynthEdit, and I'm using two instances of it this way in Tracktion at the moment. It's working great. (overhead and all)Borogove wrote:You using a modular host? (EXT, Bidule?) Four input ports (2 stereo pairs) confuses a lot of hosts.
As for the overhead issue, alright, you guys win. While I think there will be a small amount of it (either CPU or filesize overhead), it probably won't be a problem for anyone. I just happen to have a perverse attraction to very svelte, efficient software. Okay?
take care,
McLilith


