How best to denigrate non-modular hosts?

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

I assert that there is no excuse other than a ridiculous poverty of imagination to develop a VST (or other plugin) host which is anything less than fully modular in the way of Audiomulch, EnergyXT, or Plogue Bidule.

I seek a properly degrading term to use to describe other, non-modular, hosts, which will so shame and embarrass the developers of those hosts that they will not allow themselves to ship so much as a bug fix patch until they have rearchitected their software to be completely freeform modular.

Suggestions?
Image
Don't do it my way.

Post

I wouldn't f**k your host with your dad's penis?

Post

Sicklecell666 wrote:I wouldn't f**k your host with your dad's penis?
I'm looking for a one word adjective that can be applied to the whole lot of 'em.

Like "well, in a modular host, you can do this, but in a ____ host, you're just f**ked."

Thanks though!
Image
Don't do it my way.

Post

:dog:

Post

"in a nonpatriphallicoitable host, you're just f**ked."

...a little awkward.
Image
Don't do it my way.

Post

there's the lowest common denominator here that must be considered, you know..

Post

How about "piece of shit"? That's common enough. :hihi:

Post

Ass-tastic?
Image

Post

nonmod

Post

A better one, courtesy of the MS Word thesaurus: preset.
Image

Post

Passe

Post

Basic

Post

Retarded

Post

Stunted

Post

Underdeveloped

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”