CUBASE SX3 vs SONAR 4 - Which one is better

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

nocompromise wrote:
S_A_P wrote:Bearded one I share your love for the ES-335, but I prefer the models from the 1970s with the Trapeze tailpiece over the newer models with the "stop" tailpiece. I wish that Gibson would make them that way again, it just looks so much classier to me.
can't agree with this. my heart always used to sink when the guitarist pulled out a les paul :cry: never could understand the point of them. or rickenbackers. guitars are made by fender. period. the rest should be furniture.
as for the answer to the question. by all accounts the answer is nuendo.
not that i use it myself. cubase won't allow you to do everything nuendo can. sonar won't let you do everything nuendo can.
personally i prefer a decent host.
and my taste in titties has changed throughout the years...............
I have a strat, but kind of wish I had a Tele instead. I traded an old weight bench that I didnt have room for for the strat so I cant complain...

Post

Bearded one I share your love for the ES-335, but I prefer the models from the 1970s with the Trapeze tailpiece over the newer models with the "stop" tailpiece. I wish that Gibson would make them that way again, it just looks so much classier to me.
Right on! I have only played a couple of these. In fact I have an Ibanez As80 which I actually prefer. :D

In my experience Strats vary too much and are tad too twangy to my ears at least when I play them.

Post

Dazza3311 wrote:
SJ_Digriz wrote:
nuffink wrote:Image

Let's get the kittens in early.
clearly the best kitten host.
I AGREE - People should not use Kittens, but the thought-field of the celestial music to place their tracks into.
PRETTY KITTIES!!!!!!!!!!

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”