spaceman wrote:it's probably about the same reduction anyway chyphCypherOne wrote:
Sneak Preview: FilterscapeVA Win
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30215 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
How does 89 sound?
Actually, I wanted to make it 99, but 89 looks better on the Buy-Now button...
Urs
Actually, I wanted to make it 99, but 89 looks better on the Buy-Now button...
- KVRAF
- 8700 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
is that a 'buy now' button or a 'buy in a few hours time when Urs has got his act together' button 

89 sounds good
79 even better
69.. well
89 sounds good
79 even better
69.. well
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
- KVRAF
- 8700 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
CypherOne wrote:urs, the king of marketing...
ruler of the kingdom of [ [edit]edit[/edit]] errr. errr... horney err virgins and erm... big bottles of beer[[edit]/edit[/edit]]
Last edited by spaceman on Tue Mar 22, 2005 5:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
- KVRAF
- 8700 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
CypherOne wrote:shut up before he changes his mind.
I made a quick edit ... pffffewwww.. that was close
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
- KVRAF
- 8700 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
CypherOne wrote:that's cool, it doesn't notice...
maybe I should edit the edit tags though?
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30215 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
- KVRAF
- 2206 posts since 16 Apr, 2004 from between my ears
[edit: aimed at the guy who wanted to pay only after he made money with it...]
is this for real? people work to build this stuff. if you want to use it, pay for it.
this is one of the lamest arguments i have ever heard. when did people start thinking like this? must have something to do with how it became ok to rip off music on the net.
why don't you give your commercial music away to people with the understanding that they will pay you for it only if it makes enough people dance at their parties? if they liked it enough to play it at the party after hearing it on the radio (for example) or hire your band to play live then i'm guessing you would like to be paid, no?
is this for real? people work to build this stuff. if you want to use it, pay for it.
this is one of the lamest arguments i have ever heard. when did people start thinking like this? must have something to do with how it became ok to rip off music on the net.
why don't you give your commercial music away to people with the understanding that they will pay you for it only if it makes enough people dance at their parties? if they liked it enough to play it at the party after hearing it on the radio (for example) or hire your band to play live then i'm guessing you would like to be paid, no?
Last edited by JamminFool on Tue Mar 22, 2005 6:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.


