Imagine it like this: You have something "going on"...bla..blaa..
Cheers!
DuX wrote:For the same price as SP-C1, you can get Rode NT1-A which is IMHO far better value, it depends a lot upon your taste, too, but from the practical and technical viewpoint NT-1A is the killa mike for like 200 euro, same price as SP-C1 here in Europe. When I say practical, I mean you can effortlessly record whatever you like with it and it turns out fine and from my point of view C1 is [only] a vocal mike, but as I've said already, everything is subjective...dlt123 wrote:Their MICs do look interesting. Does anyone offer this deal in the US? I've seen them overseas, but not here.luka2807 wrote:I strongly suggest VTB-1. Get yourself their mic too. C1 or B1. Great combo for 200 USD
Thanks,
DennisT![]()
"Subjective": I used to record my synthesiser on the left channel of an old tape recorder and me singing on the right channel . The "Synthesiser" was a Commodore64 computer and I sung on some Grundig plastic mike from the 60's. It sounded fine to me...Pure Stereo
no phase alignement problems
![]()
Well, you must start with something. Later on I used chairs, hammers, screwdrivers, table... to record rhythm parts. Lovely ay?
Point? When you don't know better, you can settle for anything. When you drive a BMW once, you'll never drive a Volga again![]()
Cheers.
Thank you for referring the CAD's. I personally don't care much if someone doesn't like my my choices, cause everyone has different ears, eyes, etc... and that's what make this world so interesting. After all, we always buy what makes our boat stay afloat.tkmattson wrote:I know some people aren't fans, but CAD is my personal favorite of the low budget large diaphragm mikes....especially the e100, e200, & e300....yes, they are more expensive than Rode, etc., but yes, they are worth it.
I'll second the props for the Marshall (MXL) mics. REALLY good value for the money on most of their models (do a web search - you'll find they're the best-kept "secret" of a lot of high end studios).Jaeson Merrill wrote:dont forget marshall mxl.. these things are so cheap, and seemingly well liked even by higher - enders
mxl 603s, 67, other ones..
DuX wrote: I'll never change my opinion that cheap is just cheap, expensive is for rich idiots and just farfetched and that the middle is golden, so I always buy better but not the best, and avoid cheap at all cost and I must tell you I have no regrets...
I am thinking of getting the VTB-1 and replacing the existing tube with the Telefunkin tube. I'm also thinking of getting the Rode NT2-A mic, do you think VTB-1 would be a good pre for the NT2-A?cthmusic wrote:I own a VTB-1 and I also own the SP C1 too (actually I own a pair). I also own a Avalon vt737sp and a Nuemann U87. Heres my analysis: The VTB-1 is more of a "dirty in a good way" mic pre in comparison to the 737. I use the VTB regularly even though I own high end mic pres too, it just has a certain sound. Its not a cheap sound! I know what cheap sounds like and the VTB is not cheap sounding.
The C1: very hard to tell a big difference in sound quality between the U87 and the C1. But there are differences. The nuemann tends to be just slightly smoother. The C1 is a little brighter than the U87 and has slightly more harmonic distortion in the highs. But, these differences only come through on my high end apogee converters. Also, I use the C1's as my drum overheads always! Ive got a pair of 414xls's and those dont cut it for the overheads!
Hope that helps
I acquired several old stock 12ax7 Telefunken tubes from a friend who didn't want or need them. Their a nice tube and I believe some of the pres I listed have them as their tube.DuX wrote:Seems like a great bang/bucks value. I wouldn't think too much about it. Except for that Telefunken tube... could you elaborate a bit why Telefunken [Telefunkin, Telefuc.... oops] in particular? What's its model number?
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026