Who genuinely knows whether musicians are against d/l music or not? Some have come out in favour of it. The bottom line is that musicians are forced to do the record companies bidding otherwise they are in danger of getting dropped.
Herein lies what that is wrong with the music industry today - it operates by using threats and accountants have a stranglehold over the record companies in deciding what music will be distributed.
When it comes to buying music I want to buy one or two songs off a CD. Not the whole crappy filler filled so-called 'album'. There is so much filler released these days that many people do not think it's worth buying the few good songs in a sea of shite. Until quality goes up there is no incentive.
Instead of expecting consumers (who aren't stupid) to pay for filler, musicians should bump up the quality of their music or sell the good stuff in a realistic and affordable way.
In other words, instead of releasing 20% good and 80% shite music every 6 months. Save it up and hopefully release 50% good and 50% shite music every 18 months instead. Then it would be woth buying. Just because someone releases music and slaps a price on it doesn't make it worth buying. Like some VST/i's I could mention. It's no use hiding shite products behind copywrite laws because they are the emporers clothes.
In conclusion, bump up the quality of the product and cut the cost and then the consumers will pay. It's a perfectly good business model in every other area of industry so why should commercial music be an exception?

