You should pay more attention while reading. You're contradicting yourself. Analogue does not cause jitter. The signal is in the digital domain until it leaves the DAC. We're talking about the cd related jitter. Jitter is the timing error, which affects how the DAC works, but this error is originated in the digital domain, due to the spacing of tiny pits on your cd for example, etc. In the analogue domain is where we hear the artefacts of jitter, but jitter is not caused in the analogue domain. That is, for one, one of the reasons why some people still prefer records to CD-s. With records, there is no jitter involved.stefancrs wrote:
Jitter is all about analog domain. The digital stuff does not cause jitter, it's faulty analog stuff that does. Unprecise clocks usually.
Btw, is stuff at -150dB (snr) audible to you? (not a difference between playback and mixdown, it's the différence between different hosts mixdowns)
Every time I export an audiomixdown in cubase it sounds crap
-
- KVRist
- 333 posts since 25 May, 2004
-
- KVRAF
- 2608 posts since 26 Aug, 2002 from here
christ your stupid
the pits are analogue - duh - digital means ones and zeros - are the pits in small sheet of metal a one or a zero - NO
the fact thats these pits are used to represent the digital information does not mean thay are the digital information - see
a cd is analogue - everything on it is not 1 or 0 but is variable - as is the motorspeed - the voltage rail supply to the dac etc - ANALOGUE
but here's the real head f**k
digital is a stream of 1's and 0's and actually does not exist anywhere in the real world - well OK I could get all quantum mechanics on your ass - but seeing as you can't tell analogue from digital i'm very sure that discrete energy levels will be way too complex for ya.
digital is a mathematical concept
you are right tho there is no jitter in records - there is masses of harmonic distortion and a really low signal to noise ratio tho
as someone who owns an sacd player i can assure you vinyl has no function (unless you can dj like q-bert) - digital encoding has it beaten on every front
the pits are analogue - duh - digital means ones and zeros - are the pits in small sheet of metal a one or a zero - NO
the fact thats these pits are used to represent the digital information does not mean thay are the digital information - see
a cd is analogue - everything on it is not 1 or 0 but is variable - as is the motorspeed - the voltage rail supply to the dac etc - ANALOGUE
but here's the real head f**k
digital is a stream of 1's and 0's and actually does not exist anywhere in the real world - well OK I could get all quantum mechanics on your ass - but seeing as you can't tell analogue from digital i'm very sure that discrete energy levels will be way too complex for ya.
digital is a mathematical concept
you are right tho there is no jitter in records - there is masses of harmonic distortion and a really low signal to noise ratio tho
as someone who owns an sacd player i can assure you vinyl has no function (unless you can dj like q-bert) - digital encoding has it beaten on every front
I believe every thread should devolve into character attacks and witch-burning. It really helps the discussion.
-
- KVRist
- 333 posts since 25 May, 2004
OK, you englightened me. CD is an analogue medium.ericj23 wrote:hrist your stupid
the pits are analogue - duh - digital means ones and zeros - are the pits in small sheet of metal a one or a zero - NO
The stupidest thing I've heard in a while. The pits may be analogue, but extraction is digital, otherwise you wouldn't need a DAC, would you, you ignorant mathematical geek
-
- KVRAF
- 4738 posts since 20 Feb, 2004 from Gothenburg, Sweden
Jitter = timing error. Where does the timing error occur? In the digital domain? There's no such thing as digital timing really.davor wrote:You should pay more attention while reading. You're contradicting yourself. Analogue does not cause jitter. The signal is in the digital domain until it leaves the DAC. We're talking about the cd related jitter. Jitter is the timing error, which affects how the DAC works, but this error is originated in the digital domain, due to the spacing of tiny pits on your cd for example, etc. In the analogue domain is where we hear the artefacts of jitter, but jitter is not caused in the analogue domain. That is, for one, one of the reasons why some people still prefer records to CD-s. With records, there is no jitter involved.stefancrs wrote:
Jitter is all about analog domain. The digital stuff does not cause jitter, it's faulty analog stuff that does. Unprecise clocks usually.
Btw, is stuff at -150dB (snr) audible to you? (not a difference between playback and mixdown, it's the différence between different hosts mixdowns)
Stefan H Singer
https://dropshotaudio.com/
https://dropshotaudio.com/
-
- KVRAF
- 3345 posts since 8 Nov, 2003 from Amsterdam
I love that.ericj23 wrote:digital is a mathematical concept
so eric, don't you have any hobbies? or a wife or girlfriend? maybe you make music once in a while? it can't be so bad that all you can do is discuss with davor? who is either a troll or completely ignorant?
-
- KVRist
- 333 posts since 25 May, 2004
You are either a talentless def quasy musician/home recordist or you just pretend to be oneM'Snah........(aka HansM) wrote:I love that.ericj23 wrote:digital is a mathematical concept
so eric, don't you have any hobbies? or a wife or girlfriend? maybe you make music once in a while? it can't be so bad that all you can do is discuss with davor? who is either a troll or completely ignorant?
It's difficult to discuss colors with people who are color blind.
-
- KVRist
- 333 posts since 25 May, 2004
stefancrs wrote:Jitter = timing error. Where does the timing error occur? In the digital domain? There's no such thing as digital timing really.davor wrote:You should pay more attention while reading. You're contradicting yourself. Analogue does not cause jitter. The signal is in the digital domain until it leaves the DAC. We're talking about the cd related jitter. Jitter is the timing error, which affects how the DAC works, but this error is originated in the digital domain, due to the spacing of tiny pits on your cd for example, etc. In the analogue domain is where we hear the artefacts of jitter, but jitter is not caused in the analogue domain. That is, for one, one of the reasons why some people still prefer records to CD-s. With records, there is no jitter involved.stefancrs wrote:
Jitter is all about analog domain. The digital stuff does not cause jitter, it's faulty analog stuff that does. Unprecise clocks usually.
Btw, is stuff at -150dB (snr) audible to you? (not a difference between playback and mixdown, it's the différence between different hosts mixdowns)
Why do you need DAC then, if we're in the analogue domain, all the time. Bitstream is an analogue stream of data??
-
- KVRAF
- 2608 posts since 26 Aug, 2002 from here
cd is an analogue medium - correct now we are getting somewhere
the pits are not read by a dac they are read by a very analogue laser that converts the reflections of the pits and material into a very analogue voltage
this is transported through some very analogue wiring to the dac which is powered by analogue electricity. The DAC knows that this analogue signal is supposed to represent a digital code - so it does it's best to convert the analogue voltage signal of close to 1's and 0's into another different analogue audio signal which is finally fed to some small analogue amplifiers and out of your cd player
at no point is there anything actually digital within a computer or a cd player - because digital is a mathematical concept
we have got very good at providing analogue representations of this mathematical concept but there is no such thing as a digital signal
the pits are not read by a dac they are read by a very analogue laser that converts the reflections of the pits and material into a very analogue voltage
this is transported through some very analogue wiring to the dac which is powered by analogue electricity. The DAC knows that this analogue signal is supposed to represent a digital code - so it does it's best to convert the analogue voltage signal of close to 1's and 0's into another different analogue audio signal which is finally fed to some small analogue amplifiers and out of your cd player
at no point is there anything actually digital within a computer or a cd player - because digital is a mathematical concept
we have got very good at providing analogue representations of this mathematical concept but there is no such thing as a digital signal
I believe every thread should devolve into character attacks and witch-burning. It really helps the discussion.
-
- KVRist
- 333 posts since 25 May, 2004
No, I've been talkin about sound with sound def geeks and wannabes. It was just a parallelEvan wrote:Have you been talking about colors all this time?
Last edited by davor on Sun Apr 24, 2005 8:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 3345 posts since 8 Nov, 2003 from Amsterdam
lol. I'm not a musician. I'm a bank manager / VP who plays guitar in his spare time
.
btw we have a pretty calendar model here, who's originally from your country: Tatiana Simic...
btw we have a pretty calendar model here, who's originally from your country: Tatiana Simic...
Plato wrote a book about that, about 2k years ago;)It's difficult to discuss colors with people who are color blind.
-
- KVRAF
- 2608 posts since 26 Aug, 2002 from here
"Bitstream is an analogue stream of data??"
correct again - your getting better
did you think if i cut open a cd player lots of 1's and 0's would fall out ?
PS i'm actually sitting in-front of 3 open word reports for work which i just can't be arsed doing - bloody risk assessments FFS.
so yes troll bating is more fun - and more educational
when i started on about quantum mechnics i realised I couldnt remember the formula for calculating the discrete quanta gven out by a system
so i looked up http://superstringtheory.com/basics/basic2a.html
planck and shrodinger - student daze
correct again - your getting better
did you think if i cut open a cd player lots of 1's and 0's would fall out ?
PS i'm actually sitting in-front of 3 open word reports for work which i just can't be arsed doing - bloody risk assessments FFS.
so yes troll bating is more fun - and more educational
when i started on about quantum mechnics i realised I couldnt remember the formula for calculating the discrete quanta gven out by a system
so i looked up http://superstringtheory.com/basics/basic2a.html
planck and shrodinger - student daze
I believe every thread should devolve into character attacks and witch-burning. It really helps the discussion.
-
- KVRist
- 333 posts since 25 May, 2004
M'Snah........(aka HansM) wrote:lol. I'm not a musician. I'm a bank manager / VP who plays guitar in his spare time.
btw we have a pretty calendar model here, who's originally from your country: Tatiana Simic...
You're a bank manager?