You should try asking Sascha and ericj. According to them an audio cd is a 16-bit analog format. Perhaps they could advise you as to which bit depth analog mixer is the best oneM'Snah........(aka HansM) wrote:I'm convinced now. Should I buy a 32-bit analog mixer? or 64-bit?
Every time I export an audiomixdown in cubase it sounds crap
-
- KVRist
- 333 posts since 25 May, 2004
-
- KVRAF
- 3617 posts since 26 Sep, 2003 from Bradford - The Armpit of Britain
I believe dav or that he is saying yes the audio data in the pc's hard drive is digital & yes the audio data held on the cd is also digital..... BUT the process of transfering the audio data from the is not digital it is 'analogue', mechanical or however you would like to term it & that during the process of transference mistakes can be made due to imperfections in the cd, lazer misalignment etc. etc. On a related note a/d d/a converters etc. - very poor ones on shitty soundcards can result in a mix etc. sounding poor, i'm not going to go into a lengthy explanation of why as it's fairly commonsense & logical, though those two particular terms may be redundant here i fear. 
-
- KVRAF
- 2608 posts since 26 Aug, 2002 from here
davor - digital is a mathematical concept - a cd is an analogue representation of that - there is no digital information in any pits - there is just a hole
the hole produces a different defraction pattern/level of reflection when the laser scans over it - this light bouncing back is collected by a sensor - which turns it into a series of voltages
nothing digital there
you are confusing what analogue and digital coding with what an analogue and digital thing is
cd audio uses digital encoding
vinyl uses analogue encoding
but both the cd and the record are manufactured using a very analogue mechanical process
the item is analogue - the code is digital
jitter is caused by the conversion from the analogue to the digital domain
but anyway that's all a bit dull and obvious so how about some fun ?
describe a digital item that you can hold in your hand - should be easy for you
the hole produces a different defraction pattern/level of reflection when the laser scans over it - this light bouncing back is collected by a sensor - which turns it into a series of voltages
nothing digital there
you are confusing what analogue and digital coding with what an analogue and digital thing is
cd audio uses digital encoding
vinyl uses analogue encoding
but both the cd and the record are manufactured using a very analogue mechanical process
the item is analogue - the code is digital
jitter is caused by the conversion from the analogue to the digital domain
but anyway that's all a bit dull and obvious so how about some fun ?
describe a digital item that you can hold in your hand - should be easy for you
I believe every thread should devolve into character attacks and witch-burning. It really helps the discussion.
-
- KVRist
- 333 posts since 25 May, 2004
That's what I've been saying saying all along. But you're pretending not to be aware of that, and trying to put into my mouth the things I didn't say. I'm speaking about the code, i.e. encoding. The data is encoded in digital format. Nothin more , nothing less. When I refer to a Cd I'm refering to the data which is encoded on it, and not to the physical piece of plastic. And you're constantly talking about a piece of plastic, which is completely off the point.ericj23 wrote:
the item is analogue - the code is digital
jitter is caused by the conversion from the analogue to the digital domain
-
- KVRAF
- 13444 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
So, mister davor, why in the world would CDs then produce errors every now and then then?`Right, because it's analog devices carrying (or representing, whatever you prefer...) digital data. And analog devices are prone to errors. The same *might* be true for different harddisks, different cables and maybe even different power supplies (so I'm not even saying John Vestman is wrong). But digital is 100% exact - otherwise computers wouldn't even work at all.
And MY DAW is 100% exact too. I can mixdown a bunch of files in Cubase SX and I can bounce the same bunch of files in Logic - when I reimport them into any application and phase invert one of them, the result is silence. DIGITAL silence!
What else is there that would need prove?
And MY DAW is 100% exact too. I can mixdown a bunch of files in Cubase SX and I can bounce the same bunch of files in Logic - when I reimport them into any application and phase invert one of them, the result is silence. DIGITAL silence!
What else is there that would need prove?
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
-
- KVRist
- 333 posts since 25 May, 2004
Oh you are not saying that John Vestman is wrong? Great. Not only is he not wrong but he is absolutely right. I'm not a big shot mastering engineer, and still I can hear the differences these things above make.Sascha Franck wrote:So, mister davor, why in the world would CDs then produce errors every now and then then?`Right, because it's analog devices carrying (or representing, whatever you prefer...) digital data. And analog devices are prone to errors. The same *might* be true for different harddisks, different cables and maybe even different power supplies (so I'm not even saying John Vestman is wrong).
-
- KVRist
- 215 posts since 1 Apr, 2004 from germany
uhm. what exactly do i have to do if i wanted to phase invert something? i want to try that too and compare different hosts.
-
- KVRist
- 333 posts since 25 May, 2004
This is what I cannot agree on. The result may be silence, and still they may not sound the same. 1) different daws sound different - that's my experience. Check out also:Sascha Franck wrote: And MY DAW is 100% exact too. I can mixdown a bunch of files in Cubase SX and I can bounce the same bunch of files in Logic - when I reimport them into any application and phase invert one of them, the result is silence. DIGITAL silence!
What else is there that would need prove?
http://www.johnvestman.com/DAWSUM.htm
2)when you render a multitrack mixdown in a DAW to a single stereo file, that stereo file (played from the same DAW) doesn't sound the same as the multitrack project file played from the DAW.
-
- KVRAF
- 2608 posts since 26 Aug, 2002 from here
davor you have never mentioned digital encoding once - i mentioned it lots of time and you slagged me off but lets get a few things straight for you
mr vestmans comment that two hard drives can sound different is wrong
pure and simple
digital audio within a computer is error corrected in such a way that it is not wrong - if it was wrong your computer would just fail to work
any transfer out of the box is susceptable to jitter
but mixing within the box is always the same
mr vestmans comment that you should mixdown outside the box rather than inside is simply wrong - it makes no difference if it is all digital beause 1+1 is always 2 when working in digital - unlike analogue
in fact exporting it to another device is far more likely to produce the jitter we all want to avoid
but how can he be hearing these differences ?
people see (or hear) what they want to believe - your one of them
hope you learn one day - and maybe some better insults would make you cool
or you could try purring
mr vestmans comment that two hard drives can sound different is wrong
pure and simple
digital audio within a computer is error corrected in such a way that it is not wrong - if it was wrong your computer would just fail to work
any transfer out of the box is susceptable to jitter
but mixing within the box is always the same
mr vestmans comment that you should mixdown outside the box rather than inside is simply wrong - it makes no difference if it is all digital beause 1+1 is always 2 when working in digital - unlike analogue
in fact exporting it to another device is far more likely to produce the jitter we all want to avoid
but how can he be hearing these differences ?
people see (or hear) what they want to believe - your one of them
hope you learn one day - and maybe some better insults would make you cool
or you could try purring
Last edited by ericj23 on Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I believe every thread should devolve into character attacks and witch-burning. It really helps the discussion.
-
- KVRAF
- 13444 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
Nonsense. It does. At least on my DAWs of choice.davor wrote: 2)when you render a multitrack mixdown in a DAW to a single stereo file, that stereo file (played from the same DAW) doesn't sound the same as the multitrack project file played from the DAW.
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
-
- KVRist
- 476 posts since 20 Mar, 2004 from Netherlands
The neverending story...

-
- KVRist
- 333 posts since 25 May, 2004
I was referring to the data in digital format which the CD contains and not to the piece of plastic that a Cd actually is, I think that that is bloody obvious for everybody. You don't go to a cd shop to buy a piece of plastic, but you go there to buy an album. Or I may be wrong. Only a child of 3 would perhaps not assume that I was not referring to a piece of plastic. How old are you exactly?ericj23 wrote:davor you have never mentioned digital encoding once - i mentioned it lots of time and you slagged me off but lets get a few things straight for you
-
- KVRAF
- 2608 posts since 26 Aug, 2002 from here
i was going to reply but i can't be arsed
you have nothing to say davor - you still don't answer any questions you just keep on trolling along
no purring, no funnies, nothing
go away
you have nothing to say davor - you still don't answer any questions you just keep on trolling along
no purring, no funnies, nothing
go away
I believe every thread should devolve into character attacks and witch-burning. It really helps the discussion.
