Add to that the tyranny of 4/4 and the prevalence of bass on 1-3, snare on 2-4 (with slight variations) and the drum set becomes a straight jacket on our creativity.
In recent years the acoustic drum set has to some extent been replaced by synthesized and sampled alternatives, but most of these still adhere to the notion of the acoustic set. Bass drum on 1-3, snare sound on 2-4 (with variations). Hi-hat sounds driving the rhythm, cymbals and toms for embellishments. (OK, you got 4-to-floor, heavy rock with bass drum on every 8th or 16th, but the bass drum is present and often accentuated on 1-3 and the snare usually on 2-4). And even when music is breaking out of this formula, you still got the notion of bass drum, snare, hi-hat.
I’m simplifying things, but I think it’s a valid observation. I’ll even go as far as claiming that music that does not adhere to the formula is labelled as progressive, or even worse as experimental (there are exceptions of course, but generally spoken this seems to be the case). There are ballads – but they are ballads because of the missing or understated rhythmical drive. But other than that I can’t really think of any popular genre that isn’t slave to drum set.
So how do we free our selves of the tyranny of the drum set without making inaccessible experimental music (as I tend to do)? Can we imagine a wave of popular music that takes a different approach the percussive and rhythmic elements – or am I an old fart that hasn’t been following popular music for a decade?
