this is true. but tone deaf people can't back that up with fact, such as I'm about to do with this particular situation.APHELEON2K5 wrote:this doesn't mean shit and you know it. tone deaf people will swear up and down that they are real good singers
well I hope your assemblage is in order. I was going to take the time to go track-by-track and point out every obvious bit here and there, but since so much of it is just 'overall', I won't waste my time. basically what you have is an unpolished album with music that virtually lacks all high end, is hard limited to the point of detriment and mixed REALLY poorly. on top of that (or, underneath that, I should say), you have weakly processed thin sounding vocal lines that are consistently dry and uneffected regardless of the music surrounding it - and more often than not they are unintelligible and lost in the music. when I say that it was mixed poorly I mean, essentially, that overall instrument balance was substandard in that instruments would blare in eradicating pre-existing elements of the song, and/or instruments were not balanced so that all of them could be properly deciphered in the mix.the audio world is waiting with baited breath. i'll call a press conference.
these points, in addition to the utter and total lack of post-production polishing lend to the opinion that the production quality was shit and that the entire cd sounded like a poorly engineered demo. if you would like a more specific and detailed analysis, you'll have to wait until I have more time.
obviously you're the obtuse one. that much is apparent. I was merely asking for some clarification regarding the way you worded the phrase "trent and I should listen to your music". especially considering that I've never heard your music, nor make any comments regarding your music prior to your statement.who is the obtuse one?? no, i had nothing to do with the cd or trent.
