I hate it when people ride llamas around and call me silly Sally.M'Snah........(aka HansM) wrote:Only 4 posts. I'm not sure if he knows about the search function.
I'm glad you mix at 16 bit. Thanks for sharing.
btw I noticed that you're only commenting on my post, but not adding anything useful to the thread. I hate it when people do that.
best Exciter
-
- KVRAF
- 10597 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
-
- KVRian
- 717 posts since 30 Apr, 2004 from Jerusalem, Israel
-
- KVRAF
- 10597 posts since 13 Jun, 2004 from Alberto Balsam
Oi. Times like this I wish I was xoxos...M'Snah........(aka HansM) wrote:Chase Altertone wrote:[[...]I hate it when people do that.There's a lot of hatred in your life dude. You need more love. (or maybe this was just your way to get my attention?)Chase Altertone wrote:I hate it when people ride llamas around and call me silly Sally.
Look. I was just saying: Whether he knew or not about the search function is irrevelant. I know of the search fuction and I still start threads like these every once in a while. I didn't say anything because my vote goes for BBE which has already been mentioned. There's no need to get all c**nty about it.
Edit as for bitrate mastering, YOU brought it up.
- KVRAF
- 3944 posts since 7 May, 2004 from behind his workbench
-
- KVRAF
- 1651 posts since 14 May, 2002 from Earth
-
- KVRAF
- 8706 posts since 24 May, 2002 from Tutukaka, New Zealand
That's a bit of a sweeping generalisation - probably not even true for the majority that frequent KvR...And maybe, just maybe, an exciter is not the solution to *his* problem. Too many people mixing at 16bit think they need an exciter, while mixing at 24bit will preserve the natural brightness of a track or mix
a) If you don't put highs in to start with, you won't get them out at the end, 16 or 24bit.
b) I think you must be assuming everyone records real instruments or something - if you render VSTi and even h/w synths, there is likely to be a distinct lack of highs even if you render at 32bits. I use 32bit and I need an enhancer. Remember LPFs are a very popular filter on synths - wouldn't make any difference what bitrate you use to record with if you've got a load of synths with LPFs and samples playing.
There still seems to be this myth that enhancers are now redundant because we record digitally - complete nonsense really, especially with something like the BBE.
And my vote goes for the BBE too (although I use a h/w one in preference to the s/w).
-
TotcProductions TotcProductions https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=6202
- KVRAF
- 5156 posts since 5 Mar, 2003 from Franklin, NH
-
TotcProductions TotcProductions https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=6202
- KVRAF
- 5156 posts since 5 Mar, 2003 from Franklin, NH
and f**k sonic maximzer....i do respect it...and have used it endlessly in the past...but now that george yhoung of 4front has made contour max...i don't bother with anything else
-
- KVRist
- 440 posts since 9 Mar, 2003 from Denver Co
I've got a hardware BBE, and the software as well. But as I developed my mixing techniques I started using it less and less. Using shelving EQ and multiband compression I get good results with greater control. I still break it out on compromised material from time to time. But BBE is easy to overuse and tends to make a mix sound too harsh. So when I use it I raise the process knob just enough to detect it and then back it off a little. I don't master with it just enhance dull sounding stuff.
Pentagon,z3ta+,Tassman,Vsampler 3,FM7,Vocator,Sonar 3 Producer,SoundForge,Awave,Vegas 5
SFZ+,P5. And two kick ass DawBox machines!
SFZ+,P5. And two kick ass DawBox machines!
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Oddly enough, I found one here:kodama wrote:Does anyone know where to find a demo of BBE???
http://baixaki.ig.com.br/site/detail34242.htm


