KVR Audio

cptgone · Post by **cptgone** » Wed May 18, 2005 9:36 am

kritikon wrote:People that use Crunchessor are f**king c**ts as well......

Nah... we're crunchy c**ts!

M'Snah · Post by **M'Snah** » Wed May 18, 2005 9:38 am

greendoor wrote:So if GUP-1 isn't a side-chain add on (or wet/dry addon for that matter), how else can GCO-1 owners get side-chain or wet/dry? That's the whole problem. (Am I the only CGO-1 owner who is pissed off about this?) I appreciate that hosts have changed. Why can you not simply upgrade GCO-1 with side-chain and wet/dry. I would have been happy to pay for this. As it is - I'll wait until such time as I desperately need these features, and maybe get the demo then or see what else is on the market.

Assuming you have GAC as well, you can always use the GUP embedded in GAC for SC

. No need to get crunchy if you don't want to

scam_artist · Post by **scam_artist** » Wed May 18, 2005 10:01 am

kritikon wrote:People that use Crunchessor are f**king c**ts as well......

that hiphop outfit "Scribe" use Crunchessor do they?

kritikon · Post by **kritikon** » Thu May 19, 2005 6:23 am

I heard that tarnce outfits use Crunchessor too....

Frippertronix · Post by **Frippertronix** » Thu May 19, 2005 7:39 pm

Crunchessor is full of hearty, crunchy goodness, with just a kiss of honey. Goes great with fresh milk, grapefruit juice, and a bran muffin.

kevvvvv · Post by **kevvvvv** » Thu May 19, 2005 7:53 pm

I have GAC and GCO and like having both.

GCO is a track manager that doesn't squash the life out of dynamics.

While GAC is a track magician that does things to the material.

Just the other night I had a wind-sounding track that sounded farty thin in the mix, but still needed to be prominent..

One GAC-second later and the bugger was thick as a brick.

Very useful is a GAC

Frippertronix · Post by **Frippertronix** » Thu May 19, 2005 9:39 pm

kevvvvv wrote:I have GAC and GCO and like having both.

GCO is a track manager that doesn't squash the life out of dynamics.

While GAC is a track magician that does things to the material.

Just the other night I had a wind-sounding track that sounded farty thin in the mix, but still needed to be prominent..

One GAC-second later and the bugger was thick as a brick.

Very useful is a GAC

I already have a GUP, which I feel will be rednadant if and when I guy a GAC. Full out, GAC has more latency, but may have much less with only one compressor active.

GCO, though, purely as a single compressor, has much more versatility.

Kind of kicking myself for not waiting to pick up GAC first.

pethu · Post by **pethu** » Thu May 19, 2005 10:00 pm

Frippertronix wrote:
kevvvvv wrote:I have GAC and GCO and like having both.

GCO is a track manager that doesn't squash the life out of dynamics.

While GAC is a track magician that does things to the material.

Just the other night I had a wind-sounding track that sounded farty thin in the mix, but still needed to be prominent..

One GAC-second later and the bugger was thick as a brick.

Very useful is a GAC
I already have a GUP, which I feel will be rednadant if and when I guy a GAC. Full out, GAC has more latency, but may have much less with only one compressor active.

GCO, though, purely as a single compressor, has much more versatility.

Kind of kicking myself for not waiting to pick up GAC first.

For me, buying GAC was very much a question of ergonomics - having an all-in-one quality solution for basic channel tweaking (and much more!) available in one interface without having to pop up, organize, and close GUI windows all the time is a real benefit. I "guesstimate" that moving to Tracktion from Cubase cut my sequencer-related keyboard-and-mouse-movements by two thirds. GAC takes away another chunk of such unhealthful activities. For each labour-saving solution, I feel more and more in sync with my studio!

Kjaerhus - Wow, thanks Torben!