Regards,
JMH
Well, IMO you're making a mistake. Atleast go out and hear the new ones. It would only set you back around 100 or 200$ depending on where in the world you are located.mauseoleum wrote:ja ... don't think i'll sell those. i know them and i have no plans for editing other than multimedia in foreseable future. if i buy new set, i'll probably (if) when i move. can't really think of such things now, because i haven't got payed for y2003 yet. < joke > and they'll make even better models then so it'll be worth waiting < /joke >
actually, i was thinking of NO look-ahead at all, so as to avoid buffering and latency issues. it would basically just be a dynamic soft-clip waveshaper. and of course, you would be able to switch it off.mauseoleum wrote:i vote for leds and lookahed-thingie with option to completelly switch lookahead off.
i figured something like this would happen. it isn't completely denormal-safe yet. sorry about this. i'll try to get around to this soon.glurgle wrote:I haven't tried the very latest beta yet, so this may well be fixed. but...
I was getting some denormal type problems happening with build 36. It does the same thing that JCM900's B channel does on my computer, when the audio feeding it ends, it jumps up the cpu usage to nearly 50%. This is on a 2.4ghz p4. I saved a preset file with the settings that do this, so I'll test it on the new build and then see if I can narrow down what settings are causing it to happen.
Has anybody else noticed this?
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026