june contest ... GOSSIP

Share your music, collaborate, and partake in monthly music contests.
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Lady J wrote:Fine. People know the truth, now I'll shut up and let the music do the talking. Best wishes to all who entered. I'm not going to let this blow up into another typical "Lady J contest entry controversy" despite the actions of one person interfering with the competition.

It's one thing to have rules and conditions, quite another to change them in mid contest due to one person.
Hey, nobody's got anything against you. It's just that the fact that you're a good looking FEMALE gives you an unfair advantage in comparison to others. It's not sexist or anything...

Picture an all female contest about decorating rooms or something... You'll give the first place to the best room. Now imagine Brad Pitt decides to enter the contest and posts a picture of himself flexing his muscles in front of his newly decorated room. Wouldn't a bunch of horny girls vote for him, even if his room consisted only of a bed and 4 walls with colours that don't match?

Post

Markleford wrote:
Lady J wrote:So you;'re saying no one ever posted a picture of themselves before in that thread?
Not in recent memory (I think there were some horrible hair shots in the METEL contests), but I can definitely say that nobody has had felt that posting *two* pictures of themselves was appropriate.
Or just that you didn't feel the need to intervene in that case?
That's what he essentially said: it's derailed the gossip thread for a few pages, so "in that case" it's appropriate.

And it's continuing to derail the thread to talk about how it's derailing the thread...
"Anyone but Lady J can post pictures and has in the past without me interfering."
Now you're just talking out your ass. You're free to go back over the 3+ years of monthly contest submission threads and tell us how many people have posted pictures of themselves, and how many posted two. Then bring us this evidence how you are being solely persecuted in this matter and perhaps we'll take this pitful mewling with the seriousness it might deserve.

- m
I seem to remember Donkey Tugger and remco posting pictures.. Also Ixox. And this was not about the quantity of pictures was it? Did he say anything about me posting two? Was there a rule prohibiting us from posting one or two pictures of ourselves? No. But I guess there is now. Or will it only be in contests i enter?

Like I said, I have no problems with rules that are spelled out and clearly stated, I do have a problem when someone starts a game and then changes the rules as they see fit. That to me and any objective observer is unfair. I didn't tell people to talk about my pictures in the thread and I don't see how a general gossip thread about the contest can be 'derailed". By removing the pictures I believe he did more to 'derail' the thread by creating a controversy where non need to exist than if he had just left them alone.

Besides aren't we supposed to listen to all entries and vote? If this is the case what difference does it make? I guess I am not allowed to encode a picture wit the track either? (as I had done)

Post

Katanaman wrote:
Hey, nobody's got anything against you. It's just that the fact that you're a good looking FEMALE gives you an unfair advantage in comparison to others.
Oh then why not close the competion entirely to good looking females? That would solve the problem then wouldn't it? i mean god forbid the contest was about MUSIC and not sex.

And while we're at it, let's all ban black people from anything involving rhythm... :p we all know about their 'unfair advantage'...
It's not sexist or anything...
And you can say that with a straight face?

Arbitrary rules suck, but then again that's what 'the man' does

Make a game...
Change the rules if you start to get ahead,..
Last edited by Lady J on Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Post

the RULES wrote:(e) entered into the contest by posting a DIRECT link in this RULES & SUBMISIONS thread (use the GOSSIP thread for everything else)
slainte :| rob

Post

Lady J wrote:now I'll shut up and let the music do the talking.
:hihi:
Image

Post

Lady J wrote:
Katanaman wrote: Hey, nobody's got anything against you. It's just that the fact that you're a good looking FEMALE gives you an unfair advantage in comparison to others.
Oh then why not close the competion entirely to good looking females? That would solve the problem then wouldn't it? i mean god forbid the contest was about MUSIC and not sex.
And while we're at it, let's all ban black people from anything involving rhythm... :p
(snip)
Arbitrary rules suck, but then again that's what 'the man' does
Make a game
Change the rules if you start to get ahead,..
i dont ACTUALLY agree with katanaman but nevertheless ...

... FFS J ...

slainte :roll: rob

Post

Katanaman wrote: Picture an all female contest about decorating rooms or something... You'll give the first place to the best room. Now imagine Brad Pitt decides to enter the contest and posts a picture of himself flexing his muscles in front of his newly decorated room. Wouldn't a bunch of horny girls vote for him, even if his room consisted only of a bed and 4 walls with colours that don't match?
not sexist at all...

where is fitch to help me out?? there are not enough girls on this forum.

Post

pHz wrote:
the RULES wrote:(e) entered into the contest by posting a DIRECT link in this RULES & SUBMISIONS thread (use the GOSSIP thread for everything else)
slainte :| rob
Fair enough but the fact that you did not intercede in past contest where other stuff, like pictures were posted does tend to make your entirely new interpretation of this rule look.......dodgy.

Post

Lady J wrote:i mean god forbid the contest was about MUSIC and not sex.
So your track was so bad you had to try to boost it with a pic of ya norks?

Post

Lady J wrote:
pHz wrote:
the RULES wrote:(e) entered into the contest by posting a DIRECT link in this RULES & SUBMISIONS thread (use the GOSSIP thread for everything else)
slainte :| rob
Fair enough but the fact that you did not intercede in past contest where other stuff, like pictures were posted does tend to make your entirely new interpretation of this rule look.......dodgy.
have you not actually read any of my earlier posts ???

besides (and youre going to LOVE this) ... theyre MY rules and i can do what i want with them ... its not the national lottery FFS ...

slainte :hihi: rob

Post

And for anyone else saying this isn't sexist ask your self this, if DT, Remco, Ixox and the like sat back in a chair with a wifebeater and jeans on and posted a picture do you honestly think the reaction would have been the same?

This happened for one reason, because the female body is instantly sexualized by men.

Post

pHz wrote:
besides (and youre going to LOVE this) ... theyre MY rules and i can do what i want with them ... its not the national lottery FFS ...

slainte :hihi: rob

You've got to be in it to win it...or is that bingo?

Post

besides (and more seriously) ... if a specific situation hasnt occured before any interpretation of rules pertaining to it is bound by defenition to be "entirely new" no ???

slainte :| rob

Post

Lady J wrote:Like I said, I have no problems with rules that are spelled out and clearly stated,
Except when, for instance, your song is over the time limit or encoding rate that is "spelled out and clearly stated".

Please don't try to fall back on the "I'm a law-abiding citizen" defense: your record has proven that rules are an inconvenience to you and you'll try to bend them whenever possible.
Besides aren't we supposed to listen to all entries and vote? If this is the case what difference does it make?
That's specifically what I'd like to ask you: If this is about listening to music, what do *you* care that the pictures were removed from your posting? What difference does it make? Are you so insecure of your music and production skills that you think this has dealt a crippling blow to your chances in the voting?

At any rate, pHz runs the contest. pHz can edit the submission thread how he wants. Casting aspersions upon him in general for this one instance given his long track record of both fairness and generousity is a petty, childish thing to do.

- m
Markleford's band, The James Rocket: http://www.TheJamesRocket.com/
Markleford's tracks: http://www.markleford.com/music/
Markleford's free MFX, DXi2, DR-008 modules: http://www.TenCrazy.com/

Post

Lady J wrote:And for anyone else saying this isn't sexist ask your self this, if DT, Remco, Ixox and the like sat back in a chair with a wifebeater and jeans on and posted a picture do you honestly think the reaction would have been the same?
This happened for one reason, because the female body is instantly sexualized by men.
thats ALL as maybe ... but your acute awareness of that speaks VOLUMES in this context ...

slainte ;) rob

Post Reply

Return to “Music Cafe”