KVR Audio

Ixox · Post by **Ixox** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:43 pm

Kriminal wrote:
Lady J wrote:Now here is a good question. that picture of Ixox is kinda cute. What if like the gay guys on this board might be potentially swayed by his pic if it were in the submission thread? I'm sure it's happened before...what with that wink in his sig....
What about all the women who vote for mine without even hearing it cos im so fuckin panty wetting gorgeous?

I was one of those....

Lady J · Post by **Lady J** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:43 pm

This in my opinion is the most sensible response in the whole discussion...
Can this be the end of the debate? I agree with him on all points.

emdot_ambient wrote:Sheesh, I'm kind of glad I've been ignoring this thread (not entering the contest this month, though I will be reviewing and voting).

You people crack me up.

I'd just like to say 2 things:
1) I didn't see anything wrong with LadyJ posting self pics. They fit the theme and if anyone really would let them sway their vote, then you probably need to spend less time on KVR and more with your wife, girlfriend or looking at porn sites. When it comes down to voting, my vote will be based on the music, not pics.
2) LadyJ, you know as well as anyone that those pics were intended to invoke a sexual response. For Christ's sake, you're a nice looking girl posing for pics in basically your underwear. How else do you think a heterosexual male will react? Crying about how the female body is "instantly sexualized by men" is just a little over the top. Either use that fact by posing in scanty clothing, or refuse to play into that whole sex sells bit by only posing in non-revealing clothes. You can't have it both ways.

Like I said before, you people really crack me up!

pHz · Post by **pHz** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:43 pm

Kriminal wrote:
pHz wrote:BTW ... sorry to drag this out everyone ... i know i dont get proper serious TOO often but i REALLY am not keen on being accused of bullying ...
slainte rob
But you are a nazi....and a weeeeeeeeezil

shhhhhh ...

... thats meant to be a secret

slainte

rob

pHz · Post by **pHz** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:45 pm

Lady J wrote:This in my opinion is the most sensible response in the whole discussion...
Can this be the end of the debate? I agree with him on all points.
emdot_ambient wrote:Sheesh, I'm kind of glad I've been ignoring this thread (not entering the contest this month, though I will be reviewing and voting).
You people crack me up.
I'd just like to say 2 things:
1) I didn't see anything wrong with LadyJ posting self pics. They fit the theme and if anyone really would let them sway their vote, then you probably need to spend less time on KVR and more with your wife, girlfriend or looking at porn sites. When it comes down to voting, my vote will be based on the music, not pics.
2) LadyJ, you know as well as anyone that those pics were intended to invoke a sexual response. For Christ's sake, you're a nice looking girl posing for pics in basically your underwear. How else do you think a heterosexual male will react? Crying about how the female body is "instantly sexualized by men" is just a little over the top. Either use that fact by posing in scanty clothing, or refuse to play into that whole sex sells bit by only posing in non-revealing clothes. You can't have it both ways.
Like I said before, you people really crack me up!

so you agree with him that (like ive said twice now) you posted those pics to elicit a (hopefully positive) sexual response from people reading your posts ???

i rest my case ...

slainte

rob

Lady J · Post by **Lady J** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:47 pm

Katanaman wrote:
Lady J wrote: Compromise? i will retract that if you can admit that what you did was arbitrary to the situation and based on the inherient sexism having to do with men sexualizing the female body.
Don't start again! Men sexualise the female body because we were made that way. Accept that fact and move on. That's not sexism!

"I can't control my self cause i see tities...."

Lady J · Post by **Lady J** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:48 pm

pHz wrote:so you agree with him that (like ive said twice now) you posted those pics to elicit a (hopefully positive) sexual response from people reading your posts ???

i rest my case ...

slainte rob

I agree with him that they were attractive photos and i probably should have posted some in a burka in order to be fair.

pHz · Post by **pHz** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:50 pm

and you whinge at me about inconsistent interpretation of text ?!?

slainte

rob

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:51 pm

To be fair, the norks werent that impressive, i'd have bought a larger pair for a better effect.

Lady J · Post by **Lady J** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:53 pm

that's all natural baby, no silicone (yuck)

You™ · Post by **You™** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:54 pm

Oh, is this argument almost over? I have a very un-prurient picture of me judging produce at the fair. Probably not going to help garner votes. I'm just not that glamorous.

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:55 pm

Lady J wrote:that's all natural baby, no silicone (yuck)

natural?

donkey tugger · Post by **donkey tugger** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:58 pm

Kriminal wrote:
Lady J wrote:that's all natural baby, no silicone (yuck)
natural?

Could be..I've got a fair set, they dispense stellar tortoise of an evening.

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:02 pm

pHz · Post by **pHz** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:06 pm

im done with this ... feeling no fuhrer need to justify myself ...

slainte

rob

Col.G · Post by **Col.G** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:06 pm

donkey tugger wrote:Could be..I've got a fair set, they dispense stellar tortoise of an evening.

Ok DT, that didn't make a lick of sense.

Can somebody translate that into American for me so I can continue to follow this?
It's very entertaining.

june contest ... GOSSIP