Foorius development thread
-
- KVRist
- 88 posts since 11 May, 2001 from australia
Still working on it! Adding in sustain pedal support (ooooops!) and checking into the note-on clicking. Also looking at the issues reported with legato and portamento and changing the graphics on the effects page to stop changing once they have been clicked on. I'd like to improve the loading time once I figure out how.
andrew_k - Thanks for all the feedback.
You can create your own waves and wave sequences from the editors page under waves.
The square and pulse waves are available using PWM. Sine ould be added as another oscilator type but I think it's pretty easy to get using the digital option.
Thanks for the offer of better help files but I like the way the current ones integrate with the GUI. Any contributions for content would be appreciated though (maybe some tutorials)
andrew_k - Thanks for all the feedback.
You can create your own waves and wave sequences from the editors page under waves.
The square and pulse waves are available using PWM. Sine ould be added as another oscilator type but I think it's pretty easy to get using the digital option.
Thanks for the offer of better help files but I like the way the current ones integrate with the GUI. Any contributions for content would be appreciated though (maybe some tutorials)
-
- KVRist
- 154 posts since 5 May, 2005
Fantastic, this all sounds great! Looking forward to the next release.doogs wrote:Still working on it!
Thanks Doogs. As a guitarist I am still learning about synths and synth programming, hence I'm missing things that may be obvious to other users. I have a couple of great books on synth programming so, if I get time and feel I understand enough about how Foorius works, I will attempt a tutorial. This unfortunately won't be for a while though due to work commitments. Thanks again Doogs.doogs wrote:andrew_k - Thanks for all the feedback.
You can create your own waves and wave sequences from the editors page under waves.
The square and pulse waves are available using PWM. Sine could be added as another oscillator type but I think it's pretty easy to get using the digital option.
Thanks for the offer of better help files but I like the way the current ones integrate with the GUI. Any contributions for content would be appreciated though (maybe some tutorials)
-
LIMITAPROACHINGINFINITY LIMITAPROACHINGINFINITY https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=47871
- KVRAF
- 1850 posts since 13 Nov, 2004
Bug report,
The potamento doesnt work when the legato option is enabled and the poly is 1. if you play a string of notes the porto travels to the right note but allways from the same wrong note... Try setting porta to a high value and enable legato on the amp and filter. and also make sure you only have poly = 1
The potamento doesnt work when the legato option is enabled and the poly is 1. if you play a string of notes the porto travels to the right note but allways from the same wrong note... Try setting porta to a high value and enable legato on the amp and filter. and also make sure you only have poly = 1
The following statement is true.
The previous statement is false.
The previous statement is false.
-
LIMITAPROACHINGINFINITY LIMITAPROACHINGINFINITY https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=47871
- KVRAF
- 1850 posts since 13 Nov, 2004
Hey good job on the envelope specific legato enabled option! This was good original thinking... Normally its a global voice thing! But sometimes i only want the filter to be legato but the amp to not be! Awesome! BUT- it would be cool to have a way to turn all of the envelopes associated with voice A or B etc, to legato on or off!
Also A way to say, in mono mode, whether the lfo's are legato or not! That is, whether or not they are retriggered!
Awesome synth, this is my most commonly used one!
Also A way to say, in mono mode, whether the lfo's are legato or not! That is, whether or not they are retriggered!
Awesome synth, this is my most commonly used one!
The following statement is true.
The previous statement is false.
The previous statement is false.
-
- KVRist
- 233 posts since 21 Nov, 2003 from Australia
The GUI put me off initially but i must say this is one powerful synth. Love the vocal filter and the way modulating LFOs are handled is very clever. Good job! I'll jump in if i find any quirks or have any ideas for improvement.
And i like the astronauts myself.
And i like the astronauts myself.
-
- KVRist
- 233 posts since 21 Nov, 2003 from Australia
Does anyone else have problems with huge DC offsets from time to time with this synth? The old trick of running through a highpass filter seems to be doing the trick but it would still be nice not to have to worry about it.
This patch gives a big DC offset in my editor (Buzz):
http://www.ravenspiral.com/dckiller.fxp
Doesn't seem to have the problem in Tracktion though.
This patch gives a big DC offset in my editor (Buzz):
http://www.ravenspiral.com/dckiller.fxp
Doesn't seem to have the problem in Tracktion though.
-
- KVRAF
- 12235 posts since 18 Aug, 2003
If you turn the reverb off, you'll notice that the offset disappears. It is fairly common result of using delay-based effects, which can add very low frequencies. Tracktion might actually be filtering below 20 Hz by default.
-
- KVRist
- 233 posts since 21 Nov, 2003 from Australia
That's the thing; i did turn the reverb off and it still had a noticeable offset off to one side.shamann wrote:If you turn the reverb off, you'll notice that the offset disappears. It is fairly common result of using delay-based effects, which can add very low frequencies. Tracktion might actually be filtering below 20 Hz by default.
-
- KVRist
- 376 posts since 8 Apr, 2004 from Portland, OR
With regards to the Tracktion click-through, this is still happening, and fairly often, in Tracktion 2. It is definitely happening more with foorius than any other plugin I have.
-
LIMITAPROACHINGINFINITY LIMITAPROACHINGINFINITY https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=47871
- KVRAF
- 1850 posts since 13 Nov, 2004
The chorus adds very noisy noise! Maybe this is a dc offset?
The following statement is true.
The previous statement is false.
The previous statement is false.
-
- KVRist
- 57 posts since 17 Dec, 2004
As always, I hope for synths being able to have one or more voices from external sources.andrew_k wrote: Would it be possible to have user defined waveforms as oscillators?
// C
Fail again, fail better (Beckett)
-
- KVRian
- 1256 posts since 22 Aug, 2003
(noise is the exact opposite of dc offset)LIMITAPROACHINGINFINITY wrote:The chorus adds very noisy noise! Maybe this is a dc offset?
-
LIMITAPROACHINGINFINITY LIMITAPROACHINGINFINITY https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=47871
- KVRAF
- 1850 posts since 13 Nov, 2004
Will this synth ever progress?
The following statement is true.
The previous statement is false.
The previous statement is false.
-
- KVRAF
- 2202 posts since 16 Apr, 2004 from between my ears
indeed, is there an update in progress?LIMITAPROACHINGINFINITY wrote:Will this synth ever progress?
hoping....
-
- KVRAF
- 2202 posts since 16 Apr, 2004 from between my ears
re: the Ratio field in the OSC sections, the manual states:
- Right clicking allows the keyboard to be used to enter a value.
yes, but there is something very broken when this technique is used. if you use the Enter key to exit the field edit, it doesn't respond. if you click elsewhere on the GUI funny things start to happen, ranging from the new value being ignored, to eventual crashes of the host. often the background colors and font size of the numerics change within the field, etc. sometimes it finally displays the correct value, other times it reverts back to the initial value...very random...
also: once you have tried this, double-clicking in this field suddenly will select the text
kind of hard to explain since YMMV. just try it.
edit: forgot to add that the right-click keyboard entry method doesn't work at all for the Coarse and Fine adjustments.
- Right clicking allows the keyboard to be used to enter a value.
yes, but there is something very broken when this technique is used. if you use the Enter key to exit the field edit, it doesn't respond. if you click elsewhere on the GUI funny things start to happen, ranging from the new value being ignored, to eventual crashes of the host. often the background colors and font size of the numerics change within the field, etc. sometimes it finally displays the correct value, other times it reverts back to the initial value...very random...
also: once you have tried this, double-clicking in this field suddenly will select the text
kind of hard to explain since YMMV. just try it.
edit: forgot to add that the right-click keyboard entry method doesn't work at all for the Coarse and Fine adjustments.
