KVR Audio

McLilith · Post by **McLilith** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:24 pm

sangha wrote:TBH, I didn't think the prosecutions' case was terribly strong, but I had little to no faith in the jury given MJ's well-known history.

The only thing that's well-known, is that he is an unusual person. The public doesn't really know the facts about any of the details of his personal life.

nuffink · Post by **nuffink** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:27 pm

McLilith wrote:
sangha wrote:TBH, I didn't think the prosecutions' case was terribly strong, but I had little to no faith in the jury given MJ's well-known history.
The only thing that's well-known, is that he is an unusual person. The public doesn't really know the facts about any of the details of his personal life.

Hmmmm...

A forty something man boasts about sharing his bed with teen and pre-teen boys on television.
Which details are you missing?

deggy · Post by **deggy** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:34 pm

aMUSEd wrote:The prosecution's case was not "beyond reasonable doubt" - there was sufficient reasonable doubt imho.

exactly

seamoss · Post by **seamoss** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:38 pm

maybe we will get lucky and get OJ and MJ on a Surreal Life sometime in the near future

haydxn · Post by **haydxn** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:40 pm

nuffink wrote:
McLilith wrote:
sangha wrote:TBH, I didn't think the prosecutions' case was terribly strong, but I had little to no faith in the jury given MJ's well-known history.
The only thing that's well-known, is that he is an unusual person. The public doesn't really know the facts about any of the details of his personal life.
Hmmmm...

A forty something man boasts about sharing his bed with teen and pre-teen boys on television.
Which details are you missing?

yeah, and he boasted about it to you, did he?

the only thing 'we' know is what the media tells us, and depending on who we listen to, we could believe things either way.

it's none of our business, and we can't have a 100% applicable opinion because we're not involved.

of course, opine about the things you DO 'know', i'm not gonna try to stop anyone from doing that. but there's little anyone could say to make me

a) care
b) defend MJ
c) oppose MJ.

it's just none of my business.

nuffink · Post by **nuffink** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:43 pm

haydxn wrote: yeah, and he boasted about it to you, did he?

No. Martin Bashir.

nuffink · Post by **nuffink** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:49 pm

And if a forty seven year old man bedding children is none of your business, why is my commenting upon it your business?

SaviorNeeded · Post by **SaviorNeeded** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:49 pm

One thing's for sure, he's guilty of trying to look like Dolly Parton--next it's blond wigs and boobs.

Tom

Disclaimer: This post was meant to be funny.

putte · Post by **putte** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:52 pm

no one here knows what really happened .. or does anyone?

nuffink · Post by **nuffink** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:54 pm

putte wrote:no one here knows what happens .. or does anyone?

putte, we don't know if he f**ked those children. We do know he slept with them. He boasted about it on television.

Sicklecell666 · Post by **Sicklecell666** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:54 pm

sangha · Post by **sangha** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:55 pm

Hink wrote:
sangha wrote:
fjell_strom wrote:He's been cleared.
I posted originally under the assumption he would be found guilty. Once posted, I saw that he had been acquited of all charges.

TBH, I didn't think the prosecutions' case was terribly strong, but I had little to no faith in the jury given MJ's well-known history.
no sangha say it isn't so....you were wrong?

"mistaken", hink....mistaken......

fjell_strom · Post by **fjell_strom** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:55 pm

putte, check your private messages. I've sent you something.

No name · Post by **No name** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:55 pm

nuffink wrote:
McLilith wrote:
sangha wrote:TBH, I didn't think the prosecutions' case was terribly strong, but I had little to no faith in the jury given MJ's well-known history.
The only thing that's well-known, is that he is an unusual person. The public doesn't really know the facts about any of the details of his personal life.
Hmmmm...

A forty something man boasts about sharing his bed with teen and pre-teen boys on television.
Which details are you missing?

The thing is though, molesters don't go around bragging about it...I think he just has serious issues he needs to take care of.

nuffink · Post by **nuffink** » Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:57 pm

J_Starner wrote: The thing is though, molesters don't go around bragging about it...I think he just has serious issues he needs to take care of.

Ah bless. He's got issues. What nonce doesn't.

CNN Breaking News.......