Hydratone convolution EQ.
-
- KVRer
- 19 posts since 5 May, 2005
I've tried all sorts and ranges of eqs, from the Waves Lin EQ, Sonalksis, Sony Oxford, ect. This is by far the most musical sounding EQ i've heard to date. Pound for pound, its beat every other one I A/B'ed it next to. Did the simple 10db boost @ 10k to see how they all stacked up together. It simply did not sound "digital" at all. And the Fire button adds a very distinct sound for FX.
http://www.tritonedigital.com/hydratone.htm
Anyone else have any experience with this one?
I'm excited to hear what the compressor can do. Seriously every one needs to atleast try the demo out.
P.m
http://www.tritonedigital.com/hydratone.htm
Anyone else have any experience with this one?
I'm excited to hear what the compressor can do. Seriously every one needs to atleast try the demo out.
P.m
-
- KVRian
- 649 posts since 30 Oct, 2004 from Brighton, UK
The fire button & phase button are pretty unique & EXTREMELY Useful.
Hydratone is probably themost versatile sounding EQ out, considering it has 4 EQ models. For $149 your laughing.
I can't recommend them enough.
Also its worth going for the $199 bundle with Valvetone as that just sounds gorgeous on Bass.
Hydratone is probably themost versatile sounding EQ out, considering it has 4 EQ models. For $149 your laughing.
I can't recommend them enough.
Also its worth going for the $199 bundle with Valvetone as that just sounds gorgeous on Bass.
-
deleted deleted https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1
DELETED
-
- KVRian
- 1349 posts since 12 Jan, 2003 from Paris
The impulse responses are provided with the EQ.Jonny X wrote:The problem with 'convolution EQ' is you need a good outboard EQ (on the EQs I've seen - there aint many yet) to feed the convolutions. Only worthwhile if you have a high quality EQ sitting on the desk
And the convolutionn is only a part of the EQ algorithm.
- KVRist
- 426 posts since 14 Apr, 2003 from Switzerland
Hydratone is simply terrific. Soon they will a release a SSE optimized update.
-
- Banned
- 1842 posts since 4 Aug, 2004 from just right here
Convolution, I think, is mainly good for reverb, but anything else it thickens the sound too much, though they may sound good. There is plenty of free EQ vst about besides the commercial, that does an excellant job. You could creat your own convolution EQ or whatever, if you wanted, with SIR or HOG.
-
- KVRAF
- 2608 posts since 26 Aug, 2002 from here
anyone tried the valvetube thingie ?
cos the eq sounds nice - and abundle is available
cos the eq sounds nice - and abundle is available
I believe every thread should devolve into character attacks and witch-burning. It really helps the discussion.
-
- KVRian
- 649 posts since 30 Oct, 2004 from Brighton, UK
Valvetone is great too, for the price you're laughing.
Warm Bass, Sparkly highs.
@johnny x & Rangtangtang. It works just like any normal EQ accept it really does sound 1000 times better. Try the demo, before passing judgement. You could NOT get anywhere near the results of Hydratone using SIR
Warm Bass, Sparkly highs.
@johnny x & Rangtangtang. It works just like any normal EQ accept it really does sound 1000 times better. Try the demo, before passing judgement. You could NOT get anywhere near the results of Hydratone using SIR
-
- KVRian
- 954 posts since 15 Dec, 2000 from NY,NY,USA
If only they'd take the damm thing out of the Pluggo runtime environment. 
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal." - Albert Einstein
- KVRian
- 1118 posts since 31 Aug, 2001 from Los Angeles, CA
-
- KVRist
- 478 posts since 14 Jan, 2003 from Denmark
You are totally right here. Convolution is very "in" these days and used for almost anything. But what people do not realize is that it can not be used to give good model of much more than a natural space. That doesn't mean it can't sound good though, but people should not expect it to sound like sound has passes the equipment the impulse responses came from.Rangtangtang wrote:Convolution, I think, is mainly good for reverb, but anything else it thickens the sound too much, though they may sound good. There is plenty of free EQ vst about besides the commercial, that does an excellant job. You could creat your own convolution EQ or whatever, if you wanted, with SIR or HOG.
Torben
-
- KVRian
- 649 posts since 30 Oct, 2004 from Brighton, UK
Why Not?Torben wrote: people should not expect it to sound like sound has passes the equipment the impulse responses came from.
Torben
-
- KVRist
- 478 posts since 14 Jan, 2003 from Denmark
For several reasons.Ocean Zen wrote:Why Not?Torben wrote: people should not expect it to sound like sound has passes the equipment the impulse responses came from.
Torben
1. First any un-linearity (distortion / warming) are missed.
2. Any modulation are missed (or not transferred correctly) which is a problem if you want to use a reverb response from a modulated Lexicon, TC etc.
3. Convolution is typically made in the frequency domain which means damaged pulse response.
Torben
-
- KVRian
- 649 posts since 30 Oct, 2004 from Brighton, UK
To me and it appears every other person that uses Hydratone, it Does convey warmth and even distortion, in fact that is its strength.
Fair enough about points 2 & 3
I realise you have your own well-respected plugins to promote but have you even tried the Hydratone demo?
Fair enough about points 2 & 3
I realise you have your own well-respected plugins to promote but have you even tried the Hydratone demo?

