KVR Audio

bmanic · Post by **bmanic** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:25 pm

jmh wrote: bmanic I'll try to get that DevilFish for tomorrow so we'll have something to blow our brains and ears with

That would be awesome indeed! Also, make sure you buy that wee**... ahem..

.. that stuff that makes me compose better music.

- bManic

The Chase · Post by **The Chase** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:26 pm

insaneacyde wrote:ha,ha,ha and anyone who complains about this thread prolly just spent all there money on another OVERPICED, USELESS doodad and will now spend hours tryin to argue some use for it.
"real tube warmth" from your brain meltdown

Exactly. I swear that most people defending their hardware are only doing it because they wasted so much money for it.

jmh · Post by **jmh** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:33 pm

Nice to see that childish attitude rolling on...

How about those of us who haven't got such hardware but have the ears - and the brain - to hear the difference?-)

Put that in your pipe and smoke it,

JMH

The Chase · Post by **The Chase** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:36 pm

however i agree that argueing about it is retarded because it comes down to taste.

jmh · Post by **jmh** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:40 pm

I kind of agree, it is retarded in a way. I however disagree on the taste issue - which one you prefer if of course a taste issue, but I'm under the assumption we're talking if there is an audible difference.

And it would be clearer for everybody if these two things were kept separate... (along with all the other practically unrelated issues the original post threw in together and lumped it all as being the same)

Regards,

JMH

bmanic · Post by **bmanic** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:40 pm

I've added a third clip, featuring tape saturation where I recovered the highs with the pultec sample (adds tons of additional character). It's rather obvious this one. Enjoy.

EDIT:

Here are the clips in case you missed my first post.

Clip1

Clip2

Clip3

- bManic

Joxer the Mighty · Post by **Joxer the Mighty** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:59 pm

Chase wrote:
insaneacyde wrote:ha,ha,ha and anyone who complains about this thread prolly just spent all there money on another OVERPICED, USELESS doodad and will now spend hours tryin to argue some use for it.
"real tube warmth" from your brain meltdown
Exactly. I swear that most people defending their hardware are only doing it because they wasted so much money for it.

ddummer · Post by **ddummer** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:05 pm

clip3 is clip2 (same link).

//Daniel

bmanic · Post by **bmanic** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:06 pm

ddummer wrote:clip3 is clip2 (same link).

//Daniel

Aaah, sorry.. now fixed! Thanks for the headsup!

ddummer · Post by **ddummer** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:08 pm

maybe it is a trick request but....

Is there an un-processed version at hand?

//Daniel

The Chase · Post by **The Chase** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:16 pm

Joxer the Mighty wrote:
Chase wrote:
insaneacyde wrote:ha,ha,ha and anyone who complains about this thread prolly just spent all there money on another OVERPICED, USELESS doodad and will now spend hours tryin to argue some use for it.
"real tube warmth" from your brain meltdown
Exactly. I swear that most people defending their hardware are only doing it because they wasted so much money for it.

Roll your eyes all you want. it's still true.

It's not like i'm saying that ALL of the hardware owners are that way. Just most. Honestly, I think (and know) that [hi end] analogue sounds better, but it's an inconeniance that the functionality of software leaves in the dust.

My father just bought an analogue CD Player (seriously) and it's the best sounding thing i've ever heard.

The Chase · Post by **The Chase** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:17 pm

droolmaster0 wrote:
Chase wrote:
droolmaster0 wrote:
Chase wrote:for the record, I will never own an analog synth unless it's either a free one that somebody wants to give me or a modular.
And this is based on your view of vst analog emulation plug ins?!
All my favorite emulations out perform their hardware predocessors.
Shit, my software emulation of you outperforms its hardware 'predocessor' also.

woaowoaowoawormywormy

Joxer the Mighty · Post by **Joxer the Mighty** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:27 pm

OK, I understand where you're coming from now. It just bothers me a bit to see a blanket statement like that. I for one feel absolutely no need to defend my analog purchases, and honestly, I think the majority of hardware analog owners don't either. BUT, I can see why you'd have that impression, this does tend to be one of the topics that can make tempers flare rather easily.

bmanic · Post by **bmanic** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:36 pm

Chase wrote: My father just bought an analogue CD Player (seriously) and it's the best sounding thing i've ever heard.

Analogue CD player??

- bManic

Joxer the Mighty · Post by **Joxer the Mighty** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:43 pm

Yeah, I'm kinda wondering the same thing. Is there a new format out or something? Perhaps an optical track burned on the CD surface?

bmanic wrote:
Chase wrote: My father just bought an analogue CD Player (seriously) and it's the best sounding thing i've ever heard.
Analogue CD player??

- bManic

the analog warmth myth