KVR Audio

AKJ · Post by **AKJ** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 6:56 pm

steffensen wrote:
sure, harmonieq sounds über smooth, and i wouldnt be surprised if it were the best sounding eq of them all, but i cant overlook the cpu consumption of it, and therefore i cant really put that one on the top, as cpu consumption really must be taken in the consideration imo.

so what's actually wrong with gliss?

MickGael · Post by **MickGael** » Fri Jul 01, 2005 7:07 pm

bmanic wrote:
wm wrote:I even suggested to sonalksis that they provide x4 oversampling to sort out the high end but they gave a firm no, stating that the EQ is fine as it is..

Yea, they do seem a bit, shall we say, "unresponsive" that way.

Can't help but contrast it with (let's say) Aleksey (among many others) who is constantly improving and enhancing his work

AudioWhore · Post by **AudioWhore** » Sat Jul 02, 2005 10:47 am

yeah cpu usage definately is more important to me than an eq that takes as much cpu than a friggin reverb!

martian · Post by **martian** » Sat Jul 02, 2005 11:15 am

AudioWhore wrote:yeah cpu usage definately is more important to me than an eq that takes as much cpu than a friggin reverb!

supprising what with your name.

why not jus use your sequencers built in eq then?

blackcom · Post by **blackcom** » Sat Jul 02, 2005 3:06 pm

Hey guyes, just tried the URS EQ stuff, pretty good...

How would you rate the Sonalksis to the URS stuff?

dharmawan · Post by **dharmawan** » Sun Jul 03, 2005 12:49 pm

the sound quality is all opinion.. and the interface makes all the difference too

the URS n-series enables me to dial in a sound i like in about 2 minutes. they are also very powerful and you can hear them in action. voxengo EQs are extremely transparent, which can be a good thing and a bad thing.

those two work the best for me..

Tried the Sonalksis EQ