KVR Audio

allcentury · Post by **allcentury** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:30 pm

i have a quick question about this, i know most radio broadcasts(FM) range from 64-96kbps...

now, i have some demo's i did at 128 but also some I've done at 320, will they sound the same going through that 96kbps filter?

maybe i'm just not thinking logically on this, but as long as the source is higher than the radio frequency is it fair to say it will most likely sound pretty close or will people be able to tell?

Hink · Post by **Hink** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:36 pm

allcentury wrote:i have a quick question about this, i know most radio broadcasts(FM) range from 64-96kbps...

now, i have some demo's i did at 128 but also some I've done at 320, will they sound the same going through that 96kbps filter?

maybe i'm just not thinking logically on this, but as long as the source is higher than the radio frequency is it fair to say it will most likely sound pretty close or will people be able to tell?

well there's a lot that's gonna go on through the radio station anyhow, so it's hard to answer. The first time I had a song on the radio I couldn't believe how much breathing I was hear yet no one else noticed...

allcentury · Post by **allcentury** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:03 pm

i know people with production "ears" will be able to pick out somethings, but generally speaking

Meffy · Post by **Meffy** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:14 pm

Back when I was in broadcasting, we used INCHES per second, not bits. :-D (Yes, really.)

allcentury · Post by **allcentury** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:51 pm

no one can answer this?

Meffy · Post by **Meffy** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 9:14 pm

Why not ask someone at a radio station? They might or might not tell the truth but it'd add a data point for you to think about.

Hink · Post by **Hink** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 9:18 pm

Meffy wrote:Why not ask someone at a radio station? They might or might not tell the truth but it'd add a data point for you to think about.

maybe google mastering and radio or airplay...

Spe3D · Post by **Spe3D** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 9:23 pm

allcentury wrote:no one can answer this?

Why not upload some 96 and 320 tracks to the music café of yours and get some feedback on them?

Best regards,

Spe3d

:O)

Hink · Post by **Hink** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 9:25 pm

Spe3D wrote:
allcentury wrote:no one can answer this?
Why not upload some 96 and 320 tracks to the music café of yours and get some feedback on them?

Best regards,

Spe3d

:O)

cause nothing beats the kick of hearing the dj announce your song...especially when it's a station you like...

Spe3D · Post by **Spe3D** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 9:29 pm

Hink wrote:
Spe3D wrote:
allcentury wrote:no one can answer this?
Why not upload some 96 and 320 tracks to the music café of yours and get some feedback on them?

Best regards,

Spe3d

:O)
cause nothing beats the kick of hearing the dj announce your song...especially when it's a station you like...

Indeed Hink

it is actually a motivator to create more music too

Get it played

and this is the station to have a look at EMC Radio http://audioshots.com/auditorium/viewforum.php?f=56

Best regards,

Spe3d

:O)

Techbot · Post by **Techbot** » Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:38 pm

allcentury wrote:i have a quick question about this, i know most radio broadcasts(FM) range from 64-96kbps...

now, i have some demo's i did at 128 but also some I've done at 320, will they sound the same going through that 96kbps filter?

maybe i'm just not thinking logically on this, but as long as the source is higher than the radio frequency is it fair to say it will most likely sound pretty close or will people be able to tell?

I'm afraid your tune will be automatically downgraded to 64k or 96k on broacast. There is a difference and it does not take a producers ears to notice. But it's still as good if not better than FM radio.
Give me permission to play your tunes and I will and you can decide for yourself. If you then decide to withdraw your permission no probs.

Yours
Rob

Radio Broadcasting and info about a source