How does Miroslav compare to EWSO Gold ?

Official support for: sonicreality.com and esoundz.com
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Given the price difference I can't see them being really comparable, sound quality wise.

I have EQSO Gold and absolutely love it.

Is there anything about Miroslav that would make it worth considering as an addition for orchestral work ?

BC
If God did exist (and he doesn't) he would answer to the name of Maurizio

Post

Have you listened to some of the demos? I think we all can be happy with the sound quality. :)
I guess one of the advantages of ESQLSO would be that it has more dynamic layers for most of the instruments.
Philharmonik has a pretty awesome list of instrument patches. If I remember correctly, there should be quite some patches that would give you completely new options, like the sul ponte patch, which means playing close to the bridge and gives a very special string sound.
It will also be cool to layer Gold patches together with Philharmonik.

tele
Listen to me at soundcklick:
www.soundclick.com/wewritesongs

Post

basic channel wrote:Is there anything about Miroslav that would make it worth considering as an addition for orchestral work ?
Yes.

Emotion.

Miroslav captured orchestral performances that were dripping with emotion. We're not talking about bored instrumentalists playing scales. This is music, and Miroslav knew how to work with players to make a single note come alive and become music. This is the most exciting and inspirational aspect of Miroslav's orchestral samples, and of Philharmonik. In Philharmonik, we have orchestral performances that capture the lush emotional aspect of orchestral music - the reason we fell in love with the orchestral sound in the first place. This is a beautiful sound. Others are saying "This is a three hundred articulations sound", or "This is a three hundred gigabytes sound", or "This is a three hundred dollars sound". With Philharmonik, we are saying "This is a beautiful sound".

It's more than notes. It is music.

-Kim.
Last edited by Kim Lajoie on Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post

From what I have heard of the original Vitous library, I do think you can compare them sound quality wise. It's a different sound, but a very beautiful one. On the other hand I wouldn't expect too much in the line of keyswitching, mod wheel crossfading and so forth due to the Sampletank engine.

I'm a Gold user too and have pre-ordered Philharmonik as well as Gold Pro. In my view you can't have too many orchestral sounds in your palette. And don't forget that Philharmonik includes the complete Symphonic Orchestra AND Classical Choirs. I guess it will probably be worth the 300 USD...

Post

Ok, let's try a more serious and less propaganda-like like reply... :wink:

If you already have a good orchestral library that you're happy with, then you can probably make a lot of music without buying another. However, there is a lot of be gained by having different flavours of sounds. Sometimes you don't realise that some possibilities exist if you only use one product. Sometimes a different angle or flavour can allow you to do things you hadn't previously thought of. Sometimes having more choices gives you more confidence to take on different projects, to be more ambitious.

Aside from the generic benefits of having more choices, Philharmonik specifically is about emotional and inspiring sounds. I know that many, many people are going to be inspired by Philharmonik when they get it, and it will help "get the creative juices flowing" and give them new ideas of compositions. This could be you too. A different flavour might encourage you to try new ideas, or approach a composition in a slightly different way.

It's unbeatable value too. If you're a professional who is making money from using music products like Philharmonik, then you owe it to yourself to give it a serious look. At Winter NAMM at the IK booth I met a bunch of composers who already had the complete Miroslav orchestral sample libraries, and for them it was worth buying Philharmonik just to have it in SampleTank2 format, as a virtual instrument. Their Miroslav sample libraries get so much work that it's totally feasible to treat Philharmonik as a format conversion for samples they already have. I have a feeling we'll be hearing Philharmonik in a lot of high-profile places in the coming years.

-Kim.

Post

[DELETED]

Post

marre wrote:On the other hand I wouldn't expect too much in the line of keyswitching, mod wheel crossfading and so forth due to the Sampletank engine.
You might be surprised. The SampleTank2 engine has undergone some heavy modification to prepare it for Philharmonik. The Philharmonik engine is even more sophisticated than the SampleTank2.1 engine coming soon.

-Kim.

Post

I wouldn't mind a surprise or two... :)

Post

thanks

What sort of articulations has it got

e.g. user controllable vibrato, string note slides etc. ?
If God did exist (and he doesn't) he would answer to the name of Maurizio

Post

basic channel wrote:thanks

What sort of articulations has it got

e.g. user controllable vibrato, string note slides etc. ?
Too many to list them all here! Some basic information and a preliminary sound list can be found here:

http://www.philharmonik.com/Main.html?prod_MP

A complete sound list will be made available very soon.

-Kim.

Post

The Sampletank base engine can do some things that you'll find nowhere else.
For example: let's not forget, that we got stretch - you can do
glissandos like hell. ;)


tele
Listen to me at soundcklick:
www.soundclick.com/wewritesongs

Post

Kim (esoundz) wrote:Too many to list them all here! Some basic information and a preliminary sound list can be found here:
http://www.philharmonik.com/Main.html?prod_MP
A complete sound list will be made available very soon.
-Kim.
"Click here to see the full list of Miroslav™ Philharmonik™ sounds." is written on that site and it will take you to a patch name list.


ne other advantage of Philharmonic is that the instruments were recorded in such a way, that they are at their correct places already. No hard work to make an arrangement sitting correctly in the panorama, If I understand it right.

tele
Listen to me at soundcklick:
www.soundclick.com/wewritesongs

Post

telebunke wrote:ne other advantage of Philharmonic is that the instruments were recorded in such a way, that they are at their correct places already. No hard work to make an arrangement sitting correctly in the panorama, If I understand it right.
I'd hardly call that an advantage! The fact that the instruments are recorded in their stereo positioning is one of the things that concerns me the most about Philharmonik. And you mentioned the demos of Philharmonik - I don't really think there's anything at all in those that makes it sound "beautiful" compared to the QLSO Gold demos (which are amazing). And STRETCH - if the new version of STRETCH is usable, then I'll be happy, for sure!

I may sound like I'm down on the Philharmonik concept, but I'm not, I'm actually really excited! I'm just in sort of a "wait and see" mode - it's just too early to tell, which is what makes this great pre-order deal all the more problematic! Some of the demo's sound really quite amazing, but many of them sound fairly average, or even pretty crappy - so it's just too hard to tell whether it would compliment something like QLSO Gold yet, for me at least.

Post

Rellik wrote:just too early to tell, which is what makes this great pre-order deal all the more problematic!
It's a preorder deal.
No risk, no fun, :hihi:
Of course you can wait 'till it's out and you can try it out in a music store, but that will be after the preorder deal.

tele
Listen to me at soundcklick:
www.soundclick.com/wewritesongs

Post

Just to be clear, the instruments in Gold are recorded in their "correct" places as well.

Post Reply

Return to “Sonic Reality / eSoundz.com”