Princeton VST Reverb - Those who haven't bought it
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRAF
- 4867 posts since 18 Dec, 2000
wow I voted for the "product doesn't interest me", I'm a bit surprised by the votes, but they make me happy:)
dw
dw
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRAF
- 4822 posts since 14 Mar, 2002 from Somewhere else, on principle
Yeah, I don't much care for the sound of it. It's probably good for pop music but I tend to create ambient and it doesn't quite sound smooth enough for my tastes.
-
- KVRian
- 1222 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
You missed the option "Still to expensive for a one-trick pony"...
pethu.se/music-releases
Not a part of the loudness war!
Not a part of the loudness war!
- KVRian
- 1202 posts since 8 May, 2003 from Munich
Nice option but 100 bucks for a high quality reverb plugin is very affordable compared to the rest of the market. Take the dvr2 or vss3 reverbs of the tc6000 system for poco, they are 400 and 500 bucks respectively, and you need the poco card to begin with.pethu wrote:You missed the option "Still to expensive for a one-trick pony"...
I'd personally prefer the princeton over any other native non convolution reverb. Even though I'm covered with the poco reverbs I'd still get that one for it's different character and because it's affordable. But well, I won't since I don't want any drivers installed on my systems, particularly when they haven't undergone extensive QA proofing and therefore cause hickups/instability.
-
- KVRist
- 320 posts since 24 Apr, 2004 from Right behind you NYC
ttoz wrote:At least you were honest:) I'm surprised though!
Its not a hard question why wouldnt you expect a honest answer?
But on the topic of copy protection unless it screws up your system Ide say dont worry about it and base your purchase on lust and need.
Yes we all lust after these toys , isnt that the reason were here to lust and dream.
In my opinion the princeton reverb is worth it, its got very positive remarks in EM and others, also I think Craig Anderton loved it and Craig is a true critic.
Speaking of protection most of the developer's have no recourse but to CP there software and for good reason too.
Example; We have a bank and you deposit money in it and withdraw as well, But what if we remove the protection from the bank "no more vaults no more tellers no more guards or motion sensors no cameras"
do you think the bank would survive long doing that?
So as troublesome as protection is or dongle keys or what ever ect... We need to realize this is not done to inconvience the user but to deter the pirates, whom are hurting the industry and also hurting the economy.
It feels much better to have a nice "preferable wirebound" manuel and usually 24/7 support and updates as well as perks.
So to ask if ppl are put off by the protection scheme or if they were just uninterested in the Princeton Reverb group buy is what i think this topic was about before i started rambling, If I got off base please bear with me.
But I like my example of the bank without camera and guards and no vault door to understand why companys go thru with all this zany copyprotection without the protection bizantine or not, we all need it, and should gladly except it as a way of staying in buisnes.
- KVRian
- 1202 posts since 8 May, 2003 from Munich
It is not a way of staying in business. It is an illusion of increasing sales that way. As long as the stuff isn't intrusive - they can copyprotect all they want. But when the paying users are affected by the copy protection, thats where they lose sales.
It's gotta be enough of a hint that people who own and keep upgrading pace products like waves install the cracked versions because these don't bugger up the system. If you ask me thats one heck of a nuisance.
It's gotta be enough of a hint that people who own and keep upgrading pace products like waves install the cracked versions because these don't bugger up the system. If you ask me thats one heck of a nuisance.
-
- KVRian
- 755 posts since 12 Mar, 2004
it's a pitty that those developers don't give a shit about their customer's problems which actually paid them for having what to eat while the virtual thiefs are enjoying their products and not having problems at all

-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
Tricky set of options... I demoed the Princetown Reverb, and frankly I don't understand what the fuss is about. I put it on a channel next to a range of other reverbs (specifically: Waves True Verb, Renaissance Reverberator, Wizooverb W2, Spin Audio Roomverb M2, PSP Easy Verb, Wave Arts Masterverb, Magnus Ambience, Kjaerhus Classic Reverb, SIR, Voxengo Pristine Space) and it was one of the ones I liked least from that list.
. I guess that reverb is very subjective mind you
In any case, I wouldn't buy it because of the Pace protection, so there it is. Vote cast
In any case, I wouldn't buy it because of the Pace protection, so there it is. Vote cast
-
- KVRian
- 755 posts since 12 Mar, 2004
it's definately a tool for people who know exactly what it is and how to get the best of it. for people that are after THAT kind of sound. maybe this is the reason that made some people call it a one trick pony.
-
- KVRAF
- 2327 posts since 13 Apr, 2004 from Vancouver, Canada
The one reason I didn't wish to participate was due to it being a bit of a 'one trick pony'... I'd like a reverb plugin to have more than a room simulation algorithm... I like EasyVerb's multi-algorithm approach much better, as I've never had any luck trying to get a roomverb to sound like a convincing hall... Maybe it's just me!
Though for what the Princeton does, it does it quite well...
Though for what the Princeton does, it does it quite well...
