Babya Software Group debuts Logic 2006 for Windows

[hvaring]

Here are a couple more screenshots of what's included with Babya Logic:

Piece of friendly advice for you here:
1) get a GUI library with a professional look and feel and use it consistently across your products
2) clean up your website. It's a mess and doesn't exactly inspire confidence.
3) If you have a daytime job: don't quit it quite yet.
Good luck

[jens]

3) If you have a daytime job: don't quit it quite yet.

edit: haven't laughed that much for quite some time now - my ears are filled with tears! - thanks!

[Sascha Franck]

my ears are filled with tears!

Now that must have been a lot of laughther then...

[audiojunkie]

is this some kind of joke?

Go check out the Alt.freeware (I can't remember it exactly) news group. The guy is a despised spammer. He offers freeware that no one wants and everyone hates. Just for laughs, go and ask them what they think of him and that he's posting his stuff here. The comments will be entertaining.

One guy's got a counting list of if it's Babya ware it's....

Crapware
Shi*ware
garbage
etc.
etc.

He's SERIOUSLY despised and spams and uses different id names and trolls, etc. etc. etc.

I tried his paint program once and it was garbage.

--Sean

[jens]

my ears are filled with tears!

Now that must have been a lot of laughther then...

how did that typo happen? What was my mind doing?

[jens]

is this some kind of joke?

Go check out the Alt.freeware (I can't remember it exactly) news group. The guy is a despised spammer. He offers freeware that no one wants and everyone hates. Just for laughs, go and ask them what they think of him and that he's posting his stuff here. The comments will be entertaining.

One guy's got a counting list of if it's Babya ware it's....

Crapware
Shi*ware
garbage
etc.
etc.

He's SERIOUSLY despised and spams and uses different id names and trolls, etc. etc. etc.

I tried his paint program once and it was garbage.

--Sean

sorry but I think that's a seriously nasty post...

- how can you know his motives? Can you perhaps read his mind?

- how can you know that everyone 'hates' his software?
(can can anyone hate software anyway? If so people seriously need to get a life...)

- how can you know that his yet unreleased programme isn't better than his previous stuff?

[audiojunkie]

is this some kind of joke?

Go check out the Alt.freeware (I can't remember it exactly) news group. The guy is a despised spammer. He offers freeware that no one wants and everyone hates. Just for laughs, go and ask them what they think of him and that he's posting his stuff here. The comments will be entertaining.

One guy's got a counting list of if it's Babya ware it's....

Crapware
Shi*ware
garbage
etc.
etc.

He's SERIOUSLY despised and spams and uses different id names and trolls, etc. etc. etc.

I tried his paint program once and it was garbage.

--Sean

sorry but I think that's a seriously nasty post...

- how can you know his motives? Can you perhaps read his mind?

- how can you know that everyone 'hates' his software?
(can can anyone hate software anyway? If so people seriously need to get a life...)

- how can you know that his yet unreleased programme isn't better than his previous stuff?

Don't take my word for it...

Check out the newsgroup.

OR

Just give it some time. You'll see.

--Sean

[jens]

duded tbh I don't care enough to visit any 'newsgroup'...

[aafuss]

Below is the last of Babya Logic screenshots:

Logic WaveStudio-a professional MP3/WAV player for DJ's and musciains. 2 players, 1 sample player with 10 channels, various mix types, auto-crossfade, id3 editor, it is also skinnable:


Babya Virtual Bassist-a virtual guitar instrument:


Two sound generators will also be included-:
Babya Tone Studio:

Babya SoundGen which can use ADSR envelopes :





If you're wondering about what some of the synths are based on-they use DirectX technologies. They will be accessible via Babya Logic or can be run indepedant (as some of them can generate files that are usuable in other hosts).

[braj]

"One night in Bangkok and ShanaI's your music oyster"

[bduffy]

Doesn't that look kinda familiar...?

Oh yeah:

[No name]

To be honest, this would be a gem if the developer could be trusted. I'm not saying he can't, but something just seems suspicious. If he were established, and the software was cheap then that would be perfect for someone just beginning music production on a computer. We'll see how this plays out I guess.

[Meffy]

I don't get it: why does "Ultrasynth" look kinda hot, and the other ones look kinda generic?

Because it's a Synthetizer, ya silly! The others are boring, old-fashioned synthesizers.

I'm converting all my projects into B/B++ for DOS today. I hope it saves text in the widely used .txt file format.

music oyster

Best kind.

[audiojunkie]

duded tbh I don't care enough to visit any 'newsgroup'...

Well, I'll save everyone else some trouble with just a few highlights from the newsgroup. There's a lot more where this comes from. I figure everyone ought to know what they are getting into. After all, we work so hard to keep our DAWs honed and running smoothly. Defend him and encourage him if you will...... I personally prefer to NOT feed the trolls.

but HEY! It IS free software.

--Sean


Newsgroup: alt.comp.freeware
Thread title: Suggestion to group for dealing with Babyaware

Since either A.A. Fussy (Anthony Sullivan of the Gold Coast in
Queensland, Australia) or some other troll keeps posting links to
"Babyaware" in this group and starting threads that waste peoples' time,
it might be a good idea if we developed a standard protocol for dealing
with such posts. We could do something like posting a standard reply
with "Babyaware alert" as the subject line. The message body of the
reply could simply be something like:
______________________________________
This software is poorly written junk that you are well advised to steer
clear of. Information about the individual who is responsible for making
and promoting this poor software is here:

<http://www.teknidermy.com/issue/11/babyafied/>

Please scroll down the page and read the comments, those by Doreen
especially.
______________________________________

or perhaps a link to another information page on the Pricelessware site
along the lines of what Susan did with the Huntersoftware ripoff:

<http://www.pricelesswarehome.org/acf/Huntersoft.php>

if Susan or somebody else would be willing to create such a page.

Just a suggestion, but Fussy has been pushing his crapware here long
enough and it makes the group look really bad.

--
Regards from John Corliss
I don't reply to trolls. No adware, cdware, commercial software,
crippleware, demoware, nagware, PROmotionware, shareware, spyware,
time-limited software, trialware, viruses or warez please.
-------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:36:03 -0500, badgolferman
<REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com <mailto:REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com>> wrote:

> I'm no fan of A.A. Fussy, but doesn't his software qualify as freeware?
> I thought that was the prerequisite for whatever gets pushed in this
> group in the first place. Let the potential user determine if it is
> any good. Your suggestion sounds like regulation to me.

I also hate regulation. However, I hate trolling too. I am quite sure a
lot of the postings about bWare comes from the author himself. It's this
kind of obscured self promotion I just don't like. But then again, I also
find it funny for some reason: This guy is like the Energizer Bunny of
Crapware and he is all over this group all the time. I have to admire the
staying power. He has more of it than you find in your average Usenet troll

If we want to find a way to stop it I do not think we get around the fact
that this stuff is free, but is it "ware"? Hardly...

--
//ceed ©¿©¬
---------------------------------
John Corliss <jcorliss@fake.invalid <mailto:jcorliss@fake.invalid>> wrote in
<news:11ek0bkmcbovj26@corp.supernews.com>:

> Since either A.A. Fussy (Anthony Sullivan of the Gold Coast in
> Queensland, Australia) or some other troll keeps posting links to
> "Babyaware" in this group and starting threads that waste peoples'
> time, it might be a good idea if we developed a standard protocol for
> dealing with such posts. We could do something like posting a standard
> reply with "Babyaware alert" as the subject line. The message body of
> the reply could simply be something like:
> ______________________________________
> This software is poorly written junk that you are well advised to
> steer clear of. Information about the individual who is responsible
> for making and promoting this poor software is here:
>
> <http://www.teknidermy.com/issue/11/babyafied/>
>
> Please scroll down the page and read the comments, those by Doreen
> especially.
> ______________________________________
>
> or perhaps a link to another information page on the Pricelessware
> site along the lines of what Susan did with the Huntersoftware ripoff:
>
> <http://www.pricelesswarehome.org/acf/Huntersoft.php>
>
> if Susan or somebody else would be willing to create such a page.
>
> Just a suggestion, but Fussy has been pushing his crapware here long
> enough and it makes the group look really bad.
>

What about making some changes to the FAQ stating that people who are
advertising their own software have to meet pre-reqs of some sort.
While I support young programmers, I abhor troll-ish like activity.

Just a thought.

--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
El Gee // www.mistergeek.com <http://www.mistergeek.com> <><
Know Christ, Know Peace - No Christ, No Peace
Remove .yourhat to reply
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--------------------------

Using at least one appendage, the entity known in this space-time continuum
as El Gee <mcwtlg.yourhat@yourhat.gmail.com <mailto:mcwtlg.yourhat@yourhat.gmail.com>> revealed in
<news:Xns96A2431E21804mcwtlgyourhatyourhat@216.196.97.136>:

> What about making some changes to the FAQ stating that people who are
> advertising their own software have to meet pre-reqs

Nice idea, but I don't see how it would actually stop anything. These rats
don't care what we think. What about just "plonking" any post with "babya"
in the header? Not really ideal if someone comes up with, say, "BabyApps"
as a Software House name, or similar. It's a bugger, but unmoderated groups
are stuck with the scumware pedlars

Or have I missed something?

--
Will Cornish of Cardigan, UK - No nastier than you; No filthier than usual

To EMail Remove Anti-Spam Spaces: filthy-mcnasty @ btconnect.com
---------------------------------------

"filthy-mcnasty" <filthy-mcnasty@here.now <mailto:filthy-mcnasty@here.now>> wrote in
<news:Xns96A281DC31944filthymcnastybtconne@213.123.26.234>:

>
> Nice idea, but I don't see how it would actually stop
> anything. These rats don't care what we think. What about
> just "plonking" any post with "babya" in the header? Not
> really ideal if someone comes up with, say, "BabyApps" as a
> Software House name, or similar. It's a bugger, but
> unmoderated groups are stuck with the scumware pedlars
>
> Or have I missed something?
>
>

Rule, e.g., "\bbabya\b" takes care of babyApps.
One problem remains, however: innocent newcomers might be misled
and actually try some bSh*tware.

J
--
Replies to: Nherr1professor2doktor31109(at)Oyahoo(dot)Tcom
-------------------------------------

>On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:12:29 -0700, John Corliss wrote:
>
>Since either A.A. Fussy (Anthony Sullivan of the Gold Coast in
>Queensland, Australia) or some other troll keeps posting links to
>"Babyaware" in this group and starting threads that waste peoples' time,
>it might be a good idea if we developed a standard protocol for dealing
>with such posts. We could do something like posting a standard reply
>with "Babyaware alert" as the subject line. The message body of the
>reply could simply be something like:
>______________________________________
>This software is poorly written junk that you are well advised to steer
>clear of. Information about the individual who is responsible for making
>and promoting this poor software is here:
>
>http://www.teknidermy.com/issue/11/babyafied/
>
>Please scroll down the page and read the comments, those by Doreen
>especially.
>______________________________________
>
>or perhaps a link to another information page on the Pricelessware site
>along the lines of what Susan did with the Huntersoftware ripoff:
>
> <http://www.pricelesswarehome.org/acf/Huntersoft.php>
>
>if Susan or somebody else would be willing to create such a page.
>
>Just a suggestion, but Fussy has been pushing his crapware here long
>enough and it makes the group look really bad.
>
If their are messages you don't want to view in this unmoderated public
newsgroup, then filters may be an option for you. The 12 or so
troll-like reply posts to every Bxxxxx post leaves me wondering who the
troll(s) actually is(are). All the Bxxxxx bashing replies are more
disruptive to the group than the Bxxxxx post itself. I don't have any
first hand experience with Bxxxxx products, but even though it is $0, I
would still apply the universal rule Buyer Beware. When an author is
recommending their own software I give their recommendation alot less
weight than a recommendation coming from a satisfied user.

------------------------------

Mel wrote:

>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:12:29 -0700, John Corliss wrote:
>>
>> Since either A.A. Fussy (Anthony Sullivan of the Gold Coast in
>> Queensland, Australia) or some other troll keeps posting links to
>> "Babyaware" in this group and starting threads that waste peoples'
>> time, it might be a good idea if we developed a standard protocol
>> for dealing with such posts.
<snip>

> If their are messages you don't want to view in this unmoderated
> public newsgroup, then filters may be an option for you. The 12 or so
> troll-like reply posts to every Bxxxxx post leaves me wondering who
> the troll(s) actually is(are). All the Bxxxxx bashing replies are more
> disruptive to the group than the Bxxxxx post itself. I don't have any
> first hand experience with Bxxxxx products, but even though it is $0,
> I would still apply the universal rule Buyer Beware. When an author is
> recommending their own software I give their recommendation alot less
> weight than a recommendation coming from a satisfied user.

The entire lack of disclosure of his authorship of the
sites/programs that he ("Fussy") interminally promotes *is* trollish
behaviour. The fact that he has so often morphed is enough to complete
the definition, for me.
Out of morbid curiosity, I've, at various times, downloaded a few of
the programs, and have found them varying between mediocre, and utter
crap. But that's of secondary importance.
As a newsgroup reader, I *do* like to be informed, on all of these
counts, when reading such posts for the first time. Perhaps, a word-for
word iteration of JC's C&P would be too much of an exercise in
Groupthink for the liking of some; but I'd not object to some form of
warning being attached to those threads.
If anything, a 'standardized' response might curb those disruptive,
troll-like replies that you mention. Myself; I think any such
auto-response should be perhaps more brief, consise, and objective.
Of course, an appropriate subject line addition *should* be agreed
upon, for those that would like to filter the reply posts. While
"Babyaware alert" may strike some as too pejorative, I find it quite
apt, considering the posting history.
I'd also be happy to see the practice removed, should Mr. Sullivan
confine himself with *one* posting name/address, and routinely disclose
his associations with each post.
-----------------------------
-----------------------------

Newsgroup: alt.comp.freeware

Thread: Warning Babyware!


Yes, ladies and gentlemen, crapware and pottyware are back again,
"made" by the Babyware Software Co. Luckily this shitware is
temporarily unavailable, as is the Babysuit (full of shit, I guess).

Usime
--------------------
I bet you nevr even tried it before.
--------------------
"narcippias" <bammo75@yahoo.com <mailto:bammo75@yahoo.com>> wrote in
<news:1122620174.760875.190680@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:

> I bet you nevr even tried it before.
>
>

If by "it" you mean Babyaware, then I have...two pieces of it. They
uninstalled quite well. I will not go on a tirade of how poorly written
they were. I wish the author of the software well and hope he/she/it
finds fame somewhere, but I do not/will not promote that software.

--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
El Gee // www.mistergeek.com <http://www.mistergeek.com> <><
Know Christ, Know Peace - No Christ, No Peace
Remove .yourhat to reply
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
------------------

[audiojunkie]

Here's some more information about Babya. It is an interview. Be SURE to read the comments that come after the interview. I didn't realize this before, but he's disrupted forums other than just alt.comp.freeware.

--Sean

http://www.teknidermy.com/issue/11/babyafied/