DSP algorithms

[;-)]

in an - so called - unisono effect we need only a small amout of detuning by - say - one semitone maximum or so. in this case - i think - we do not need any frequency-based approach, because the artifacts generated by a granular approach will remain small. i didn' try, but maybe artifacts introduced by FFT/iFFT due to windowing and leakage could be more severe.

Exactly.

.

[;-)]

On creating a effect of a classical approach wich processes audio. Mrs. blümchen (current identity) has the best algorithm so far (detunator). But he has the optinion not to threat it as unisono.

And he wont tell how he did it even if urs tries hard to get it from him (only a joke).

Mrs. Blümchem. Hi Hi hiii hi.
Are you really sure about the identity?

And she actually DID tell, how it is made.
Rather than some wannabes above, who talked bullshit (phase vocoder) and obviously have no clue how that all really works ...

.

[Urs]

Then prove, what you said.

I'm a well balanced person. I don't need to prove anything. It's a waste of time anyway.

Go ahead, render your next account invalid.

Urs

[;-)]

Then prove, what you said.

I'm a well balanced person. I don't need to prove anything. It's a waste of time anyway.

Go ahead, render your next account invalid.

Urs

That's fine, if you think you are a "balanced person".
But simply sayng "U talk bullshit." to persons, who obviously are just more *right* than you (and actually have made the proove), isn't specially "balanced". Not even saying it at all.

You mask your missing knowledge. That's the point.

And by the way: saying what the truth is, is a reason for being banned here ??? Oh my. How far it is come now ...

Cheers.

[Galleoneer]

there is no need in bitchfighting. make code no war

(my new initiative against terro-trollism or troll-terrorism)

see what or content custromers say:

customer1:
once I have wastet so much time trolling in dsp forums but thanks to Galleoneers initiative I am coding dsp stuff agin.

customer2:
I ve give a shit (load of) on trolling now.

[;-)]

That is what I call "well balanced" !!! Really. You are fine (at the moment)!


By the way (thesis): Who is trolling?
The men who tries to make some persons here a fool by talking shit and misinformation and showing completely missing backend with the things he claims to "know" (building entirely on his "great" reputation here - probably all based on such nonsens)?

Or the person, who tries to de-masks such real trolls with proove and sarcasm?

A question of definition, obviously.

.

[Galleoneer]

That is what I call "well balanced" !!! Really. You are fine (at the moment)!


By the way (thesis): Who is trolling?
The men who tries to make some persons here a fool by talking shit and misinformation and showing completely missing backend with the things he claims to "know" (building entirely on his "great" reputation here - probably all based on such nonsens)?

Or the person, who tries to de-masks such real trolls with proove and sarcasm?

A question of definition, obviously.

.

Just to leave the past behind and make a new beginning (flower power style).

Urs is usuall very ok. He allways tries to help other people. Sometimes we all can make a false statement. No need for a execution

[Music Engineer]

Somewhere in between this huge nonsense I tryed to explain that I am about to make a unisono effect by stacking multiple instances of the generators (By hosting them). This will be the Unisono in clasical way.

did i get that right? you want to build a plugIn which in itself hosts several instances of the same VSTi, each instance with a slightly displaced set of parameters? this then could be really called unisono. but i guess my cpu is already afraid of it. however, in such a monstrosity - i think - the user should specify which parameters should be displaced (randomly or determistically) and by which amount. and -of course- how many instances of the vsti should be created (o.k.,i think this is obvious)

[Urs]

Ok. I give up. You want prove for the superiority of phase vocoders for pitch shifting? Here you go:

http://plasq.com/musolomo/

Cheers,

Urs

[Galleoneer]

Ok. I give up. You want prove for the superiority of phase vocoders for pitch shifting? Here you go:

http://plasq.com/musolomo/

Cheers,

Urs

I only have a computer (pc) no mac sorry
Any WinTel/WinAMD demo out?

[Galleoneer]

did i get that right? you want to build a plugIn which in itself hosts several instances of the same VSTi, each instance with a slightly displaced set of parameters? this then could be really called unisono. but i guess my cpu is already afraid of it. however, in such a monstrosity - i think - the user should specify which parameters should be displaced (randomly or determistically) and by which amount. and -of course- how many instances of the vsti should be created (o.k.,i think this is obvious)

exactly what I planned.

[Urs]

Ok. I give up. You want prove for the superiority of phase vocoders for pitch shifting? Here you go:

http://plasq.com/musolomo/

Cheers,

Urs

I only have a computer (pc) no mac sorry
Any WinTel/WinAMD demo out?

I don't think so. But if you ever come to Prenzlauer Berg, I canshow it to you

Cheers,

Urs

[;-)]

Ok. I give up. You want prove for the superiority of phase vocoders for pitch shifting? Here you go:

http://plasq.com/musolomo/

Cheers,

Urs

This product proves really nothing. It don't even fit into this entire discussion about the "unisono effect" here.

[Galleoneer]

I don't think so. But if you ever come to Prenzlauer Berg, I canshow it to you

Cheers,

Urs

Yeah cool, I am regularly in Berlin again after the 15.9. then we could also drink a beer and talk about a new synthesizer concept (I got one in mind).

[Urs]

we could also drink a beer and talk about a new synthesizer concept (I got one in mind).

Yep! Just say when

Cheers,

Urs