time to power brag

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

jens wrote:
BONES wrote:
ttoz wrote:ofcourse I am talking about the vst effect, Bones, but mine are fully processing at the time. I can load up 8000 in logic if i want and there will be no cpu hit either if not processing stuff.
Well, I just asked because it seemed daft for you to be using effects as a guage when instruments tend to use a lot more CPU. unless your talking 19 tracks of audio, which is just boring.
nope - the Ambience test is way better for comparing hosts/cpu's - Ambience crunches cpu-power like there's no tomorrow - you simply need to load any .wav to a track (you can leave the default preset) and then duplicate that track a few times (might be this simple task ain't that easy in Orion though...) - you don't have the problem that you need to talk about how many voices you used, how many oscillators, what the release-settings were etc. blablabla - also Ambience is easily accessible to anyone regardless wether he's on Mac or pc - I only need copy the track six times b.t.w. on my XP2600+ Barton as my cpu maxes out after the seventh instance...
alas ambience is clearly optimised/runs better on the athlon not the pentium - and it is quite possible similarly optimised for the mac -

so afraid it is not a good test at all
I believe every thread should devolve into character attacks and witch-burning. It really helps the discussion.

Post

[DELETED]

Post

in what way could it be optimized for Athlon? - Is there an instruction-set that Athlons have but Intel-cpu's not? :?

Post

my ass is optimised for the toilet...:troll:

Post

jens wrote:in what way could it be optimized for Athlon? - Is there an instruction-set that Athlons have but Intel-cpu's not? :?
3D Now!

Post

snooky wrote:
jens wrote:in what way could it be optimized for Athlon? - Is there an instruction-set that Athlons have but Intel-cpu's not? :?
3D Now!
I see - but isn't this an instruction-set for graphic tasks? How can Ambience make use of it to reduce the amount of cpu it needs to process audio? :?

Post

[DELETED]

Post

i don't know how it is optimied but i rember seeing it run far more times on an athlon than an intel. Yet other plug-s were running similair amounts

it could be it wasn't optimised for the intel (unlike almost all other pro PC software)
I believe every thread should devolve into character attacks and witch-burning. It really helps the discussion.

Post

[DELETED]

Post

ericj23 wrote:
it could be it wasn't optimised for the intel (unlike almost all other pro PC software)
I guess so... - b.t.w.: the 64bit AMDs also support SSE2 and some even SSE3... :-D

Post

ttoz wrote:
jens wrote:
snooky wrote:
jens wrote:in what way could it be optimized for Athlon? - Is there an instruction-set that Athlons have but Intel-cpu's not? :?
3D Now!
I see - but isn't this an instruction-set for graphic tasks? How can Ambience make use of it to reduce the amount of cpu it needs to process audio? :?
it can be used for audio, fact..
that's interesting - so plugins can indeed be optimized for Athlons?

Post

I get the impression that Ambience isn't optimised... full stop.

The other "Ambience Test" - the one that I find more interesting - is to compare it against other reverb plugs...

On my system it goes something like this:

RV7000: 4% CPU
Wave Arts Masterverb: 5% CPU
Kjaerhus Classic Reverb: 6% CPU
Waves Renaissance Reverberator: 8% CPU
Magnus Ambience: 24% CPU :-o

There's no doubt that Ambience is one of the best sounding of them all... but personally I'm thinking that CPU hit eliminates it from the running :wink:

Post

I can have 9 ambience's runing on my 3000+ AMD 64 with logic 5.51..I think that my system is a bit messed up tho...or is that normal?
changing asio buffer size made no dif...

Post

gotta download the Logic 5.51 demo and see if it makes any difference compared to eXT...

Post

[DELETED]

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”