KVR Audio

jmh · Post by **jmh** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:32 am

Ok.

You do know that a generalisation applies to everybody, right?

JMH

;-) · Post by **;-)** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 8:58 am

jmh wrote:Ok.

You do know that a generalisation applies to everybody, right?

JMH

That is no generalisation. But a specification.

robenestobenz · Post by **robenestobenz** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:13 am

000 wrote:That is no generalisation. But a specification.

Saying "very often" makes it pretty general.

I swear, you are some kind of humourless AI sent out onto the internet to experiment on people's patience.

pHz · Post by **pHz** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:16 am

robenestobenz wrote:
000 wrote:That is no generalisation. But a specification.
Saying "very often" makes it pretty general.
I swear, you are some kind of humourless AI sent out onto the internet to experiment on people's patience.

nothing that sophisticated ...

slainte

rob

;-) · Post by **;-)** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:20 am

robenestobenz wrote:
000 wrote:That is no generalisation. But a specification.
Saying "very often" makes it pretty general.

I swear, you are some kind of humourless AI sent out onto the internet to experiment on people's patience.

"Very often" is no generalisation. "Always" would be.

And what's so funny with the fact, that the guy desperately tries to get a "state" here, based on a post count (reached by talking shit all the time).

Wait ...

That is indeed funny.

.

Sascha Franck · Post by **Sascha Franck** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:34 am

Boy oh boy...
See, 000, I even believe in your coding and graphical skills. I honestly do. I also agree with some of your more technically based comments. But really, as good as your upcoming plugins might be (and I'm sure they will be good), I wouldn't even install them if they were for free. Yes, I might miss something and I'm sure you'll call me an idiot - still, I just won't them get even close to my machine. Fear of bad karma or something like that...
And btw, usually my moral standards aren't all that high. But you gotta draw a line at one point.

And to the others: No, I don't believe he's being serious when "outing" himself as schizophrenic. He's just enjoying being an asshole - which *might* of course qualify for some sort of mental illness.

efluon · Post by **efluon** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:48 am

See, 000, I even believe in your coding and graphical skills. I honestly do. I also agree with some of your more technically based comments. But really, as good as your upcoming plugins might be (and I'm sure they will be good), I wouldn't even install them if they were for free. Yes, I might miss something and I'm sure you'll call me an idiot - still, I just won't them get even close to my machine. Fear of bad karma or something like that...
And btw, usually my moral standards aren't all that high. But you gotta draw a line at one point.

yes his grafix are quite nice. but the code does not really seem to be up to his own standards

and i really have to agree that using his stuff does about the same thing to your karma as wearing nike's does

Galleoneer · Post by **Galleoneer** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:26 am

pHz wrote:
robenestobenz wrote:
000 wrote:That is no generalisation. But a specification.
Saying "very often" makes it pretty general.
I swear, you are some kind of humourless AI sent out onto the internet to experiment on people's patience.
nothing that sophisticated ...

slainte rob

Do you got any info who this guy in real life is?

pHz · Post by **pHz** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:27 am

no ... and even if i did i couldnt publish it here obviously ...

slainte

rob

Sascha Franck · Post by **Sascha Franck** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:37 am

Galleoneer wrote: Do you got any info who this guy in real life is?

An asshole. Why bother about any exact informations? He's more than enough of a plague on KVR allready, no need to let him spoil your offline life as well.

pHz · Post by **pHz** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:38 am

although anyone can do a whois on the jackle & hyde website (that wont necessarily give you who 000 is though obviously) ...

slainte

rob

Galleoneer · Post by **Galleoneer** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:51 am

000 wrote:
robenestobenz wrote:
000 wrote:That is no generalisation. But a specification.
Saying "very often" makes it pretty general.

I swear, you are some kind of humourless AI sent out onto the internet to experiment on people's patience.
"Very often" is no generalisation. "Always" would be.

And what's so funny with the fact, that the guy desperately tries to get a "state" here, based on a post count (reached by talking shit all the time).

Wait ...
That is indeed funny.

.

You never won any controversy against me, never. You always loose and look real bad. Thats a fact.

But if there is something I can count on, that it is that you will try again just to get another load of humiliation.

Do we also add a masochistic to your gallery of your heroic attributes

Galleoneer · Post by **Galleoneer** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:55 am

pHz wrote:no ... and even if i did i couldnt publish it here obviously ...

slainte rob

its just we got some lawyers as friends and they told me if I knew who this guy in real life is I could get instantly rich.

pHz · Post by **pHz** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 12:24 pm

its not THAT difficult to find out ...

slainte

rob

rsmus7 · Post by **rsmus7** » Mon Aug 29, 2005 12:29 pm

ok, maybe I´m a bit pushy,

but I thought it was a thread about a multimode filter

and not a multimode personality

Galleoneer Multimodefilter Mk2 - Some impressions