Excuse me, but let this be/leave a discussion between grown up people. Even if you are joking, I thing that from an design aspect, from the aspect of ergonomy, one can expect similar/identical buttons for similar/identical functions. If I can mute/solo a miditrack in the arrange, why on earth shouldn't I be able to do the same in the mixer if the mixer already shows a midichannel. Otherwise, what is the mixer good for?egbert wrote:What are you lazy or something?mojkarma wrote:I have to jump between different screensets not only because of the mute function, but also to solo/mute a midi channel (driving my external synth).
In an analog studio with a bunch of rack gear and a big console and patch bays etc you have to physically move your head and body around to look at the status of various meters and leds etc. You also have to dick around with wiring to patch in compressors etc.
With a digital studio, most of it is inside your DAW and if you have sufficient monitor space you can display different things simultaneously. I run dual monitors and my main screenset consists of mixer and arrange in both Logic and SX. I can see what is going on in both all the time if I wish to.
If you are on a laptop or something and need to press a single key to swap screensets to check the status of something - what exactly is the problem? You may as well complain that the program doesn't write the song for you too - that would be the harder bit wouldn't it?
As far as screensets go, I don't know your setup, but on a mac the screens are real changing anything but fast. Cubase behaves much better in that aspect on a pc but thats a different story.
