Boss PW10 V-Wah The Worlds First Modeling Wah

http://www.americanmusical.com/item--i-BOS-PW10.html
Boss PW10 V-Wah The Worlds First Modeling Wah

cool thanx, the truth is it isn't worth it for a vox either for me, I just never got into it...I did have a morley power wah back in the 70's but I only liked the fuzz on it (that was ages agogreendoor wrote:I had a Vox wah that got a bit crackly, so I trialled one of these because it has a 'Vox' setting. My impression is that the pedal has a very limited mechanical opening range, which I dislike because it's hard to have any real control over the wah. Sort of On/Off. Maybe it's internally adjustable - I didn't get that far. The digital modeling sound just isn't anything like the resonant sound of a Vox. At the time I had a Roland GP100 which could use an Expression pedal for a wah. I didn't see any advantage over that. My Podxt can do wah, but I need to buy a special pedal so I won't bother. I would just use a good VST wah and automate it. Depends on your style - if you just rock it up& down with the rythmn, then auto wahs can be good. If you want to make your guitar talk, consider a talk box - otherwise, I would buy a Vox pedal again.
That's interesting AC, thanx..I should go there more often...see I was struck right away by the fact that it had the overdrive, in fact it suppose to have my overdrive, boss turbo. But my pedal is half a pedal, the foot piece is gone but it still works. That is al I use in my live rig. Though my Marshall pre-amp (9000)has an insane lead channel, it's way overkill for me. I like a straight tube amp hit with an overdrive to excite the pre-amp tubes too make them clip...I have much more control. So I use the minimal channels on my pre with my turbo in front of it...maybe I should just search ebay for a crapped out boss pedal (doesn't matter what type as long as it has the foot piece)...but I also rely more on my pre-amps in my guitars...Aural Chaos wrote:If you didn't already know, www.harmony-central.com
has millions of user reviews of this and just about any other piece of gear you can think of.I was thinking at one point of buying this wah,and I think the gist of the opinions was that it is pretty good,but is annoying to program,and the distortion fx tacked on are not that useful.
It's using the same wah COSM models as the GT-PRO & GT-8 and sounds great. The GT-Pro and GT-8 have deeper editing of the models though. My Dunlop wah has now become a useful doorstop.Hink wrote:All these years I never really got into wah much because it's always noisy as hell, but I saw this today thumbing through a catalog and wonder if anyone has tried it?
Boss PW10 V-Wah The Worlds First Modeling Wah
http://www.americanmusical.com/item--i-BOS-PW10.html
what pre's do you use in your guitars? I PA2s (EMG) in all my guitars as well as using EMG 81 (x3) an 89 and an 85...ew wrote:I love wah- for a few years, it was the only effect in my guitar rig.
Morleys have a wider range than CryBabys do. The CryBaby with multiple settings (I forget its model name) is really flexible for a hardware wah. I also like their Hendrix model (my hardware wah of the moment)- the whole filter frequency response is shifted down compared to a normal CryBaby.
That being said, my favorite wah of the moment is the one in Guitar Rig. You can set frequency, resonance AND volume for minimum, middle and maximum values of the pedal you're using to control it with. Use it with a midboost/sweep preamp (I have preamps in most of my guitars), and you'll run into positions with the pedal where everything is harmonicsHit a harmonic and you'll hear some harmonics you've NEVER heard before...
ew
A good one will withstand generations of 16 stone guitar players stepping on it 300 nights a year.deastman wrote:I'm still not quite clear on what is so special about a wah pedal.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026