Antares Auto-Tune fiasco
-
- KVRist
- 367 posts since 16 Feb, 2004
I noticed that www.antarestech.com has been updated to have a new look.
...And with that new look, I also noticed that their previous note that said that Autotune VST (for PC)would be available by December has been REMOVED.
Does anyone know if this is officially cut?
-Ido
...And with that new look, I also noticed that their previous note that said that Autotune VST (for PC)would be available by December has been REMOVED.
Does anyone know if this is officially cut?
-Ido
-
Muzik 4 Machines Muzik 4 Machines https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=9550
- KVRAF
- 7829 posts since 6 Oct, 2003 from Quebec
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
-
- KVRian
- 1005 posts since 1 Apr, 2002 from Spain
Just curious: Why would you want it as VST when it´s already there as DirectX? Are you using a host that supports only VST and not DirectX or what?idobs wrote:I noticed that www.antarestech.com has been updated to have a new look.
...And with that new look, I also noticed that their previous note that said that Autotune VST (for PC)would be available by December has been REMOVED.
Does anyone know if this is officially cut?
-Ido
Best Regards
Roman Empire
Roman Empire
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 367 posts since 16 Feb, 2004
Good question. In Sonar, VST will allow routing MIDI into the plugin in a way that can be RECORDED and PLAYED-BACK in Sonar. Today, requires a multi-host MIDI driver, which AudioPhile 2496 doesn't do.
-Ido
-Ido
Roman Empire wrote:Just curious: Why would you want it as VST when it´s already there as DirectX? Are you using a host that supports only VST and not DirectX or what?idobs wrote:I noticed that www.antarestech.com has been updated to have a new look.
...And with that new look, I also noticed that their previous note that said that Autotune VST (for PC)would be available by December has been REMOVED.
Does anyone know if this is officially cut?
-Ido
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Becuase you can't automate DX plug-ins in Cubase, and VST plug-ins are generally more stable too (in Cubase).Roman Empire wrote:Just curious: Why would you want it as VST when it´s already there as DirectX? Are you using a host that supports only VST and not DirectX or what?
-
- Banned
- 380 posts since 11 Aug, 2005
Quite true.bduffy wrote:Becuase you can't automate DX plug-ins in Cubase, and VST plug-ins are generally more stable too (in Cubase).Roman Empire wrote:Just curious: Why would you want it as VST when it´s already there as DirectX? Are you using a host that supports only VST and not DirectX or what?
.
-
- KVRian
- 1005 posts since 1 Apr, 2002 from Spain
Thankx! I did not know that the Directx format has got these limitations, cause I hardly ever use any.
Best Regards
Roman Empire
Roman Empire
-
- KVRist
- 255 posts since 13 Apr, 2005
Have you tried calling and asking?
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada

