DuosX VST Voice Doubler
-
- KVRAF
- 6596 posts since 21 Jun, 2004 from Secret Underground Hideout
i like it. i really want this to be on the up and up. i'd like to see some wise ass make it look easy and slap together something for nothing. that whole "pro" attitude is so sad
i've always worked on a shoestring. i find it challenging and satisfying....not to mention necessary. if i had that kind of money, i still wouldn't just give it to some "pro" guy
i've always worked on a shoestring. i find it challenging and satisfying....not to mention necessary. if i had that kind of money, i still wouldn't just give it to some "pro" guy
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2054 posts since 3 Jun, 2001 from Not far from Australia
Ok, the renaming is done, so you guys just cant find out the ingredience of the VST.
(Would be too easy, would'nt it?)
Some guys here chalanged me to give the out the VST, to prove that its for real.
Thats how I put it online, quickly.
It is, as I wrote a 3 day demo, with a ugly gui...
If I ever realise it than for sure with a nice gui and hopfully bug free.
(and with the credits.
)
The point was rather to prove that its possible,
to do such a VST within a few hours.

(Would be too easy, would'nt it?)
Some guys here chalanged me to give the out the VST, to prove that its for real.
Thats how I put it online, quickly.
It is, as I wrote a 3 day demo, with a ugly gui...
If I ever realise it than for sure with a nice gui and hopfully bug free.
(and with the credits.
The point was rather to prove that its possible,
to do such a VST within a few hours.
Last edited by Midiworks on Sat Sep 17, 2005 10:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Banned
- 380 posts since 11 Aug, 2005
In that case you had not planned to sell it already, right?
And by the way, that don't explain why you renamed the (partwise commercially) modules. You just admited, that you did not donate (because EVM modules must not be donated nor credited). I think it was intention.
Don't play so much the big "software maker" (see your license) if you are merely using the know how of others to build SE documents, please.
.
And by the way, that don't explain why you renamed the (partwise commercially) modules. You just admited, that you did not donate (because EVM modules must not be donated nor credited). I think it was intention.
Don't play so much the big "software maker" (see your license) if you are merely using the know how of others to build SE documents, please.
.
Last edited by ;-) on Sat Sep 17, 2005 10:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2054 posts since 3 Jun, 2001 from Not far from Australia
Oh, I did not plan it...;-) wrote:In that case you had not planned to sell it already, right?Midiworks wrote:Ok, the renaming is done, so you guys just cant find out the ingredience of the VST.
(Would be too easy, would'nt it?)
Some guys here chalanged me to give the out the VST, to prove that its for real.
Thats how I put it online, quickly.
It is, as I wrote a 3 day demo, with a ugly gui...
If I ever realise it than for sure with a nice gui and hopfully bug free.
The point was rather to prove that its possible,
to do such a VST within a few hours.
.
But everyone wanted it for free, thats why I mentioned the donation.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2054 posts since 3 Jun, 2001 from Not far from Australia
Is this in any way your buisiness ?;-) wrote:In that case you had not planned to sell it already, right?
And by the way, that don't explain why you renamed the (partwise commercially) modules.
.
I dont think so.
You are accusing me without any ground...
Last edited by Midiworks on Sat Sep 17, 2005 11:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 12235 posts since 18 Aug, 2003
Synthedit = SE
EVM = Etric
Etric = www.evmsynths.com
Chris = Chris Kerry
Midiworks = Rene
Chris and Etric are module developers for Synthedit.
EVM = Etric
Etric = www.evmsynths.com
Chris = Chris Kerry
Midiworks = Rene
Chris and Etric are module developers for Synthedit.
Last edited by shamann on Sat Sep 17, 2005 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
TotcProductions TotcProductions https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=6202
- KVRAF
- 5157 posts since 5 Mar, 2003 from Franklin, NH
I think i've still got a day left on my antares demo..i'll compare them today and hit you back midiworks
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2054 posts since 3 Jun, 2001 from Not far from Australia
What are you talking man ???;-) wrote:In that case you had not planned to sell it already, right?
And by the way, that don't explain why you renamed the (partwise commercially) modules. You just admited, that you did not donate (because EVM modules must not be donated nor credited). I think it was intention.
Don't play so much the big "software maker" (see your license) if you are merely using the know how of others to build SE documents, please.![]()
Where and when did I admid this?
You just admited, that you did not donate (because EVM modules must not be donated nor credited). I think it was intention.
A license was included, so guys like you cant sue me
just for the fun of it.
I guess at least this I got right...
Are everybody is going crazy here ?
I really wonder...
Sad, sad day...
-
TotcProductions TotcProductions https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=6202
- KVRAF
- 5157 posts since 5 Mar, 2003 from Franklin, NH
Please people, if you're going to starte "Accusing" anyone, please learn to spell the word first. 
-
- Banned
- 380 posts since 11 Aug, 2005
Sorry but I did "quote" him (and his misspelling). But he corrected it already.TotcProductions wrote:Please people, if you're going to starte "Accusing" anyone, please learn to spell the word first.
@Midiworks:
OK then, let it be as it is now.
I mean, acting "The Knowless" worked in such cases always quite good...
But when you played the "big software developer", (delivering us with ease what Antares needed years of development) you did not seem that kinda stoopid you want to make us believe at the moment.
.
-
TotcProductions TotcProductions https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=6202
- KVRAF
- 5157 posts since 5 Mar, 2003 from Franklin, NH
I almost believed that you were "Quoting" his misspelling of the word...until your wrote that blob of nonsense-grammar.;-) wrote:you did not seem that kinda stoopid you want to make us believe at the moment.
peace!
-
Jaeson Merrill Jaeson Merrill https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=29081
- KVRian
- 1185 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from nowhere you believe in
ummm, i dont remember anyone challenging you, ?Midiworks wrote:Ok,
Some guys here chalanged me to give the out the VST, to prove that its for real.
Thats how I put it online, quickly.
-
- Banned
- 380 posts since 11 Aug, 2005
Hi hi, hi.TotcProductions wrote:I almost believed that you were "Quoting" his misspelling of the word...until your wrote that blob of nonsense-grammar.;-) wrote:you did not seem that kinda stoopid you want to make us believe at the moment.
peace!
Me obviously found a wound. Now some ppl seems to form a kinda anti attack (trying to deform my sharp egded senses) with spelling science ...
How many languages do you spell ALWAYS right?
What an great ability (to discover misspelling and "nonsense-grammar") form an hunne if he actually tries to perform your native mother language ...
Feel great!
.

