Does anyone here use a wave editor
-
- KVRAF
- 3964 posts since 31 Aug, 2003 from In a foreign town, in a foreign land
Acoustica here. Sleek, elegant, does the job, and so on.
//edit
Good support for DXed VSTs, too. Golwave always goes funky[1] on me when I try that.
Groet, Erik
[1] not the music.
//edit
Good support for DXed VSTs, too. Golwave always goes funky[1] on me when I try that.
Groet, Erik
[1] not the music.
Pop music delenda est.


-
- KVRAF
- 3364 posts since 16 Feb, 2004 from atop a katamari
ditto on acoustica. does the job and is really really cheap.
http://www.acondigital.com/index_english.html
http://www.acondigital.com/index_english.html
Kick, punch, it's all in the mind.
- KVRist
- 314 posts since 8 Oct, 2004 from Newberg, Oregon 97132
WaveLab for me also, WaveLab 4 that is. Powerful program. I love the Audio Montage and I also like that I can mute my effects to see how it compares to the raw wave file vs my fx edits. Some wave editing programs will not allow for this comparison. Also, editing is non destructive until you save the results to disk.ghost666 wrote:WaveLab 5 rules. The Audio Montage feature is wicked!
It's CD/DVD authoring second to none,not that I've tried anyway!
WaveLab also comes with some really nice tools, i.e. spectrum analizer, stereo widening, etc.
If you keep your eye open for WaveLab 4 on eBay you can usually find a new copy for a great price. That's where I found mine. No problems registering it.
Good luck,
DennisT
Coronal Winds Radio - Tune In!
Remember, what you believe doesn't rewrite reality.
Remember, what you believe doesn't rewrite reality.
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
Another vote for Adobe Audition. It is certainly indispensible here. I think it is simply fabulous, with outstanding recording quality and top-drawer effects - the best reverbs and convolution I have come across in any piece of software... the effects justify the price before you even start on the core program 
-
- KVRist
- 367 posts since 20 Aug, 2004 from Sydney, Australia
WaveLab Essential on my Centrino notebook and Bias Peak on my Mac - find them both invaluable for finalizing/mastering my final mixes and burning true Red Book CD's - including CDText... or converting masters to mp3.
-
- KVRist
- 331 posts since 30 Mar, 2003
-
- KVRAF
- 7043 posts since 28 Apr, 2004 from france
I think acoustica 3,3 since it has preset chain, could be among the greatest, if only it could accept vst !!!!
-
- KVRAF
- 2938 posts since 18 Jul, 2005
Audition. The ability to apply VST effects to specific frequency regions in the spectral view is lovely for sound design, the effects bundled are excellent. I'd like to have Soundforge as well, for it's far superior beat detection (and the ability to batch export them) and the audio threshold triggered recording.
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
I also recomend Acoustica.
SoundForge is good too (I have V.7) but its not cheap, and for a lot of things I prefer Acoustica anyway (eg: as external editor for Tracktion)
<edit> I believe native VST support is on the way for Acoustica
<edit> I believe native VST support is on the way for Acoustica
-
- KVRist
- 85 posts since 3 Jan, 2005 from Seattle <-- HERE --> Vancouver
I have the latest Sound Forge and Audition, but I always seem to use my old, trusty CoolEdit for quick & simple stuff... hard habit to break.
-
- Banned
- 4073 posts since 15 Mar, 2004
I have used Cool Edit for a long time, then I upgraded to Audition -- esp for the VSTi support. Audition is incredible -- and maybe you have to use it for a while to discover it's true capabilities, but it is indeed awesome -- Low CPU, crystal clear audio, exceptional built-in FX like NR, Time-stretch, convolution, delays, echoes... I wouldn't switch to another editor if you paid me! (well, maybe a million dollars er sumpthin... 
-
- KVRian
- 933 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Guanajuato, Mexico
Acoustica is headed for the big leagues, really. If they add native VST support (works fine with VST-DX adapters) and reduce the buffer latency, then it will be even good for mastering purposes.
Development is a bit slow but sure. I was happy to see some of my suggestions implemented in 3.2 and 3.3.
Development is a bit slow but sure. I was happy to see some of my suggestions implemented in 3.2 and 3.3.
- KVRAF
- 5263 posts since 16 May, 2002 from Brisbane , Australia
Wavelab is IMO the best. Wish I had the funding to buy it.
I have Sound Forge Audio Studio which does the job.
I have Sound Forge Audio Studio which does the job.
Intel Core i7 8700K, 16gb, Windows 10 Pro, Focusrite Scarlet 6i6