convolution is a nice toy .... but nothing for real buisness.Stupid American Pig wrote:convolution is the only way to go...
Too static sounding...
convolution is a nice toy .... but nothing for real buisness.Stupid American Pig wrote:convolution is the only way to go...
Funny that Quik Quak seems to use it then...hifiboom wrote: convolution is a nice toy .... but nothing for real buisness.
Too static sounding...
Yes. Just like Impulse Modeler by Voxengo. It uses raytracing to create an impulse response which is then usable in a convolution process. IM creates an IR for use in another program; RaySpace appears to generate it for its own engine.hifiboom wrote:i thought it was based on raytracing....
No, reverbs dont generate impulse responses. If you send a DIRAC spike or somesuch through a reverb you can obtain its impulse response, but that's different from what you are saying.every reverb does generate an impulse response... that doesn`t mean its using convolution...
whyterabbyt wrote:Yes. Just like Impulse Modeler by Voxengo. It uses raytracing to create an impulse response which is then usable in a convolution process. IM creates an IR for use in another program; RaySpace appears to generate it for its own engine.hifiboom wrote:i thought it was based on raytracing....
No, reverbs dont generate impulse responses. If you send a DIRAC spike or somesuch through a reverb you can obtain its impulse response, but that's different from what you are saying.every reverb does generate an impulse response... that doesn`t mean its using convolution...
Sometimes I like this, sometimes that... I like to have the optionhifiboom wrote:you are right you can hear fluttering with very short sognals and quikQuak... But thats not the point..
You all are searching for smooth sounding reverb, and than you wonder why the reverb does not fit into the mix perfectly... it sounds like an FX behind your music... All impulse response reverbs, I tried, sound like an extra fx behind the sound. I hate that....
This strongly depends from the room. Normaly, the echos you can hear in a natural room are the eraly reflections, not fluttering echos. I don't know what rooms you've been, but for me, only "bad" rooms have fluttering echos (parallel walls etc.). So, I agree, they exist and therefore we can assume they are realistic, but they are often not desired.Smooth reverb has nothing to do with realistic room simulation... Go into a real room and clap in your hands and you ll also hear some fluttering... that is realistic...
AFAIK, the Wizoo dont uses modulation. At ArtsAcoustic, you can turn this off. Btw, the Pitch Bend feature on RaySpace is similar feature to what you mean.What Quik Quak doews much better than any other:
-generating deep reverbs, that sound far away....
-get part of the original signal ( I can easily divorce the fx from the dry output from all other vst reverbs)
-have no special fx to make the sound smooth
( I can easily hear the chorus FX in many reverbs to make it sound better, you can also hear it on the ArtsAcoustic and Wizoo)
So you guys think a reverb tool sound smooth, so you will be putting a chorus_reverb combination on every sound you use it on.
This is what I always do, believe me.What I meant to say:
Try the reverb tools in the mix, and you ll see which one is better...
nearly ever room I know has parallel walls... what do you mean... and of course:don't know what rooms you've been, but for me, only "bad" rooms have fluttering echos (parallel walls etc.).
An ultra smoothed out reverb will never sound good in a mix,This is what I always do, believe me.
Try the reverb tools in the mix, and you ll see which one is better...
You say that as though there's only one universal standard of what 'good in a mix' actually means. But that's bullshit.hifiboom wrote:
An ultra smoothed out reverb will never sound good in a mix,
no its just my personal opinion, and and ignorant person like you just don`t accept it! I have tried all vst reverbs, and none did convince me.whyterabbyt wrote:You say that as though there's only one universal standard of what 'good in a mix' actually means. But that's bullshit.hifiboom wrote:
An ultra smoothed out reverb will never sound good in a mix,
Hi hifiboom,hifiboom wrote:no its just my personal opinion, and and ignorant person like you just don`t accept it! I have tried all vst reverbs, and none did convince me.whyterabbyt wrote:You say that as though there's only one universal standard of what 'good in a mix' actually means. But that's bullshit.hifiboom wrote:
An ultra smoothed out reverb will never sound good in a mix,
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026