Chamberlin + Mellotron: Complete Newbie needs Advice

Sampler and Sampling discussion (techniques, tips and tricks, etc.)
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

emdot_ambient wrote:I've heard that from other former Tron owners, and read that from famous producers who worked with the beasts over the years. It's funny how the legendary status of an instrument will make some people want nothing but the pure experience, even if that pure experience was frustrating to people who used the gear before in its day.
The only way to get "the pure experience" is to own one! It is bizarre (to me) that people want to inherit all the failings and inadequacies of an old instrument, especially when they are so easily overcome today. For me, the only thing of charm on a Tron is the sound - the overhead of getting that sound is a PITA. Many other genuine Tron owners would agree (which is probably why Rick Wakeman ceremoniusly dragged two of his to the top of a hill, poured petrol over them and set light to them!!!).
emdot_ambient wrote:Excellent point. I've wondered about that (how fast the original tape mechanism could rewind).
It depends on a whole raft of conditions:

* If the key isn't fully released and there's still some pressure on the tape from the pinch roller or tape head pressure pad, it can slow the return down (and you're likely to get tape 'chatter' through proximity of the tape to the head as it whizzes back).

* If the return spring has stretched over time, then the return will be slower of course (and it's hard to 'tighten' a spring' once it has stretched)

* If there is any slight obstruction in the mechanism due to mis-alignment, it will be slower; the spring can just jam and only return halfway.

* And further to the above, is there is any mis-alignment, in severe cases, this can result in the tape getting creased/wrinkled (or even ripped if the tape sticks but the return spring insists on pulling it back!!!)

All sorts of problems!!!

On a well maintained (or brand new) Tron, the tape return snaps back quite quickly and is pretty swift but that generally doesn't last long!!! Of course, the weird phenomenon with the tape return mechanism when you are actually playing the thing is the acoustic 'slapping' noise coming from inside the case as the tapes spring back to position!

But there are other issues too that extend beyond just the argument of looped/unlooped with regard to total authenticity. For example, the whole keyboard is serviced by a huge capstan that runs the entire length of the keyboard and each key has its own pinch roller that engages each key's tape with the capstan to pull it forward and over the tape head. Fine but....

Play big chords and the pressure exerted on the 'master' capstan causes it to slow down and so the tapes don't play back at the correct speed. Or another scenario.... you're playing a chord and everything's fine - then you add some extra notes to that chord and that extra pressure causes the whole lot to varispeed down slightly (and when you release those new notes or the original chord, the whole lot reverts back up to normal speed).

In light of the above, to only focus on looping Tron samples as some kind of herecy is missing the point - there is much more to retaining 'authenticity' than that!
emdot_ambient wrote:Again, it's all in what you want. If you want to make a song that emulates old Mellotron songs, you have to make sure you don't hold notes over the maxium of about 8 seconds. The physical nature of the Mellotron forced players to adopt an unnatural staggered playing if they wanted to hold chords for a long time. If you just want to use those amazing sounds for ethereal pads and non-immitative infinitely sustaining chords, then loop away.
In his review of my CDs in Sound On Sound, Nick predicted that my looping the samples would cause "spontaneous combustion" amongst Tron purists (*) but as an ex-Tron owner himself, he knows which one he'd prefer! He said of my Trons:

"I found the overall character of these samples to be superb. In comparison to my extensive personal collection of Mellotron sounds garnered from numerous sources, this set beat mine hands down for sheer presence and clarity within a mix .... the Mellotron sounds are as fine as you’ll hear anywhere."

And he should know!

(*) The irony of this is that the greatest furore about looping Tron samples appears to come not from genuine Tron owners but from those using samples!!!!
emdot_ambient wrote:And being the humble owner of a lot of the old Hollow Sun free samples--THANKS!--I would recommend anyone interested in the Mellotron sound to look into Steve's product. I'm sure it's fantastic!
:)

Steve

Post

The irony of this is that the greatest furore about looping Tron samples appears to come not from genuine Tron owners but from those using samples!!!!
True. i have never owned a Tron, use M-Tron religiously, but for the me the idea of loops is, i dunno, a bit like cheating somehow. For me part of the Tron experience are the limitations, particularly the 8 second one which forces you to play in a different way (which oddly seems to suite my style of playing 'cos i'm a shite keyboard player). i like limited instruments because they force you to do things you may not have thought of.

Mr A

Post

Mr Arkadin wrote:True. i have never owned a Tron, use M-Tron religiously, but for the me the idea of loops is, i dunno, a bit like cheating somehow. For me part of the Tron experience are the limitations.....
But you use the Arturia Moog Modular and MiniMoog which not only overcome the original instruments' limitations (like appalling tuning, lack of polyphony and memories, etc.) but actually add facilities not present on the orginals (like oscillator sync, PWM, extra LFOs, etc., on the MiniMoog). Equally as sacriligious to a Moog purist ;)


Steve

Post

Mr Arkadin wrote:
The irony of this is that the greatest furore about looping Tron samples appears to come not from genuine Tron owners but from those using samples!!!!
True. i have never owned a Tron, use M-Tron religiously, but for the me the idea of loops is, i dunno, a bit like cheating somehow. For me part of the Tron experience are the limitations...
I don't look on it as cheating but I do like limitations. On the other hand, I like choices, too. I'd prefer a Mellotron emulation to have a one-click option "looped" and "un-looped." Kind of like I wish the Oddity had a Mono/Duo/Polyphonic option.

I bought the M-Tron and all its tape banks before Steve came out with his sample set (or maybe I was just unaware of it at the time) but if I were to make the decision again . . . ? I might very well go with his.

Post

hollowsun wrote:
Mr Arkadin wrote:True. i have never owned a Tron, use M-Tron religiously, but for the me the idea of loops is, i dunno, a bit like cheating somehow. For me part of the Tron experience are the limitations.....
But you use the Arturia Moog Modular and MiniMoog which not only overcome the original instruments' limitations (like appalling tuning, lack of polyphony and memories, etc.) but actually add facilities not present on the orginals (like oscillator sync, PWM, extra LFOs, etc., on the MiniMoog). Equally as sacriligious to a Moog purist ;)
He he. Touche'. Your turn, Mr Arkadin!

Post

emdot_ambient wrote:
Mr Arkadin wrote:
The irony of this is that the greatest furore about looping Tron samples appears to come not from genuine Tron owners but from those using samples!!!!
True. i have never owned a Tron, use M-Tron religiously, but for the me the idea of loops is, i dunno, a bit like cheating somehow. For me part of the Tron experience are the limitations...
I don't look on it as cheating but I do like limitations. On the other hand, I like choices, too. I'd prefer a Mellotron emulation to have a one-click option "looped" and "un-looped." Kind of like I wish the Oddity had a Mono/Duo/Polyphonic option.

I bought the M-Tron and all its tape banks before Steve came out with his sample set (or maybe I was just unaware of it at the time) but if I were to make the decision again . . . ? I might very well go with his.

same here


and I agree with you totally

Post

But you use the Arturia Moog Modular and MiniMoog
Actually i don't. i use CreamWare's MiniMax (yay) which sticks pretty much to a real Mini. Sure you can make it polyphonic - to be honest i rarely do. Those three-osc bass sounds get a bit much with six-note chords!

i usually run my CW Profit-5 with (you guessed it) five voices and i use GForce's Oddity over CW's Prodyssey because the latter doesn't do Duo mode (which is why, emdot_ambient, GForce can't make Oddity polyphonic - you'd have to run two entirely different architectures to have Duo and Poly modes).

However i do like and use the extras on impOSCar (i have a real OSCar - hmm, maybe there's a pattern here...)

i also have a real Jupiter-4 and CR-78 which are limited (4-voices, preset patterns respectively) but produce some gorgeous sounds.

i also 'nudge' the master tune knobs on synths occasionally because i don't like everything to be exactly in tune - i miss the master tune knob on impOSCar for this reason - we don't all want perfectly tuned synths.

Mr Arkadin

Post

Mr Arkadin wrote:
But you use the Arturia Moog Modular and MiniMoog
Actually i don't.
My apologies....

I was trawling around and ended up somewhere where I thought I recognised your sig where a gear list was shown that listed Arturia products - I was obviously wrong/confused/mistaken (and/or having a 'senior moment'). Ooops!

That said......

You appear to enjoy the potential of the 'extras' in the simulated/modelled synths you use so...... ! The same argument can be levied against looped Trons ;)

That said, it appears you are open to my arguments on the matter.
Mr Arkadin wrote:i also have a real Jupiter-4 and CR-78 which are limited (4-voices, preset patterns respectively) but produce some gorgeous sounds.
I was never impressed with either of those on paper until I had a chance to use them and I have to concur that they were (are?) great gear (I particularly loved the 'random' arpeggiator on the JP4).

You seem to be a man after my own principles sir - authenticity rules! But, given the option, I am sure you'd like your JP4 to have an extra oscillator or your CR78 to be totally programmable - both of these are possible when sampled! Is that such a far cry from a looped Tron - to overcome the originals' limitations with modern advances in techology?


Steve

Post

Believe me if someone made a virtual Jupiter-4 or CR-78 i'd be over the moon - i'm certainly no purist, i just find that some ways of working suit the 'original' instrument, eg. i tend to use MiniMax monophonically not necessarily because it was monophonic but because a lot of the sounds just don't work polyphonically (although i have programmed a few nice polyphonic pads). i do use MiniMax's built in Chorus and Delay as well, definitely not on the original.

Likewise i like the movement that M-Tron forces you create for long chords, although there's no saying i wouldn't use a loop function occasionally if it had the option :wink: How do loop points work on such wobbly sounds though?

BTW i have been a Hollow Sun fan for ages and love the site and what you're doing (nice to see the SOS review), how about a CP-30 sample set like your CP-70 one - i much prefer this wobbly Numan beast - great 'piano' sound.

Post Reply

Return to “Samplers, Sampling & Sample Libraries”