YOU WILL NOT BELEIVE THIS
- KVRAF
- 1817 posts since 1 Jun, 2003
hehe... just like most magic - they make you concentrate on one thing so you don't notice the other... i am actually proud of myself for figuring these out. gotta say i am fecking drunk. half a bottle of jim beam w/ coke (pepsi, actually)...
i immediately figured out how the cards could work. i didn't double check, because finding one loop hole was enough not to bother any further...
the first one with the symbols, i didn't bother to understand mathematically - what is obvious if you keep hitting and rehitting the buttons, is that the symbols next to each number do not remain constant (much like the card trick, i suppose), so it's very easy for them to make it work each time...
i am drunk and would probably qualify as math-dyslexic if i bothered to get myself checked. oh my, this was fun. yay yay yay...
i immediately figured out how the cards could work. i didn't double check, because finding one loop hole was enough not to bother any further...
the first one with the symbols, i didn't bother to understand mathematically - what is obvious if you keep hitting and rehitting the buttons, is that the symbols next to each number do not remain constant (much like the card trick, i suppose), so it's very easy for them to make it work each time...
i am drunk and would probably qualify as math-dyslexic if i bothered to get myself checked. oh my, this was fun. yay yay yay...
- KVRAF
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
and so am I ...fabi the underachiever wrote: I am drunk
- KVRAF
- 1817 posts since 1 Jun, 2003
i'd qualify as math dyslexic whether i was drunk or not, though. jens, where in germany do you reside, actually... hm, maybe i'll pm you one of these days. don't usually do that kind of thing, too much intimacy and i don't want to bother/bug anyone and stuff....jens wrote:and so am I ...fabi the underachiever wrote: I am drunk
- KVRAF
- 11396 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
.. you ARE drunk!fabi the underachiever wrote:i'd qualify as math dyslexic whether i was drunk or not, though. jens, where in germany do you reside, actually... hm, maybe i'll pm you one of these days. don't usually do that kind of thing, too much intimacy and i don't want to bother/bug anyone and stuff....jens wrote:and so am I ...fabi the underachiever wrote: I am drunk
:PManic
-
- KVRAF
- 1530 posts since 20 Apr, 2005 from southsubchicago
reading these posts is scary ...this is a great example of something i won't f**k with...i'm confused enough, and starting to get tipsy...
rg
rg
Last edited by ross g on Sun Oct 23, 2005 10:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
KVR: come for the music, stay for the polemics and grammar lessons...
-
- KVRAF
- 4143 posts since 7 Sep, 2001 from Melbourne, Australia
I really liked this one.Colonel Flashback wrote:http://sithsense.com/flash.htm
The other tricks I already knew, but I enjoyed Darth's 20 questions.
Caleb
Happiness is the hidden behind the obvious.
- KVRAF
- 1577 posts since 20 May, 2002 from Cambridge, UK
THIS IS MY MUSIC: https://spti.fi/rZyjX7i 
- KVRAF
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
I'm in Cologne - Klemperer lives in Hamburg as well b.t.w.fabi the underachiever wrote: where in germany do you reside, actually... hm, maybe i'll pm you one of these days. don't usually do that kind of thing, too much intimacy and i don't want to bother/bug anyone and stuff....
- KVRAF
- 1817 posts since 1 Jun, 2003
yay, so proud of myself again... i may be wrong, but it just seems so intuitive, no matter what they say.
am i kind of right that if you stay put, chances are 33%, and if you change your mind they are 50%?
would only make sense, because if you change your mind, you essentially change the setup - i.e. you do not choose from one out of three, but from one out of two. and it is very clear, that the one has odds of a third, and the other of a half...
but this is all just erm... my mind rambling... yay.
- KVRAF
- 1577 posts since 20 May, 2002 from Cambridge, UK
well to me it's very counter-intuitive! even though the mathematical argument obviously holds water
THIS IS MY MUSIC: https://spti.fi/rZyjX7i 
- KVRAF
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
I think this is wrong but I'm too drunk to solve it right now (I don't want to make a mistake)
- KVRAF
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
even if you stay with your original choice you actively choose if you're being asked for the second timefabi the underachiever wrote:yay, so proud of myself again... i may be wrong, but it just seems so intuitive, no matter what they say.
am i kind of right that if you stay put, chances are 33%, and if you change your mind they are 50%?
would only make sense, because if you change your mind, you essentially change the setup - i.e. you do not choose from one out of three, but from one out of two. and it is very clear, that the one has odds of a third, and the other of a half...
but this is all just erm... my mind rambling... yay.
door1 -> 33%
door2 -> 33%
door3 -> 33%
you choose door1 and door 2 is opened and there's a goat
now you have a new choice:
wanna stay with your original choice = door1
wanna change your choice = door3
and your chances are:
door1=50%
door3=50%
thus whatever you choose your chances are 50%
er... I think
-
- KVRer
- 28 posts since 21 Oct, 2005
This is an old saw. The maths works out that it is correct to change, but only if you know that the host always opens a door to show a goat.
It caused quite a stir in the maths community in the 50s or 60s when it happened. People bet their reputations one way or the other.
It caused quite a stir in the maths community in the 50s or 60s when it happened. People bet their reputations one way or the other.
-
- TopModernGeezer
- 2679 posts since 14 Mar, 2001 from Stuttgart, Germany
