KVR Audio

pitchdrifter · Post by **pitchdrifter** » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:35 pm

David,

you asked for feedback, you got feedback

I did point out that no mastering engineer will base a decision whether or not to be interested in a piece of equipment on how it looks. As you laid out, however, that you want to cater to only mastering engineers but others as well I explained that you might want your plugins to *look* good in magazines as well. People don't hear the sound there, and most mixing engineers aren't too impressed by specs that get a mastering engineer excited.
Hope I got it across the way it was intended now.

best

Markus

dbmcclain · Post by **dbmcclain** » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:39 pm

Yes, indeed, I did ask... and I do appreciate what you are all saying. Perhaps in time we will become more accommodating. Right now we have to draw a closure to this little adventure....

http://refinedaudiometrics.com/pages/16/index.htm

... bottom of page....

fritzman · Post by **fritzman** » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:42 pm

dbmcclain wrote:... how about a 3-band freebie with the nicer interface?

3 and a half!!! My last word!

martian · Post by **martian** » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:43 pm

i missed the party, are the free versions running stable yet (in sX)?

fritzman · Post by **fritzman** » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:44 pm

wm wrote:i missed the party, are the free versions running stable yet (in sX)?

YES!!!

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:46 pm

dbmcclain wrote:... bottom of page....

David, if you're ever around helsinki, me and bmanic owe you a several nights worth of pub rounds.

fritzman · Post by **fritzman** » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:47 pm

dbmcclain wrote:Yes, indeed, I did ask... and I do appreciate what you are all saying. Perhaps in time we will become more accommodating. Right now we have to draw a closure to this little adventure....

http://refinedaudiometrics.com/pages/16/index.htm

... bottom of page....

COOL!!! Thanx a lot!

dbmcclain · Post by **dbmcclain** » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:49 pm

I'd love to take you up on your offer! I hope I do get to Helsinki someday!

bmanic · Post by **bmanic** » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:52 pm

Kingston wrote:
bmanic wrote:Professional package = 1. top notch sound, 2. bug free, stable 3. usability good 4. attractive interface 5. brings in clients ('hip word' like ProTools)
In reality, even in protools/TDM world attractive interface is really the first or the second priority.

Sad but true.

Pretty but apparently crap sounding..

- bManic

dbmcclain · Post by **dbmcclain** » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:54 pm

Well... wouldn't you know it... in the rush to saw it off to 3 bands, for some reason the initial presets are not coming up with correct default values.

In the big boy all the presets default to 1 kHz, Q = 0.707 and Gain = 0 dB.

Go figure...

fritzman · Post by **fritzman** » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:58 pm

Oh,

is this the next bug report round?

Best wishes, FRitz

P.S. Nevermind, the Algorithmix EQs are full of bugs, too.

dbmcclain · Post by **dbmcclain** » Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:59 pm

...startup default presets are now fixed in version 1.51

dbmcclain · Post by **dbmcclain** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 12:02 am

Any bugs are very likely going to be confined to the GUI. Nothing has changed in the DSP core.

dbmcclain · Post by **dbmcclain** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 12:03 am

...nor in the VST host interface (thank God!)

mandolarian · Post by **mandolarian** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 12:03 am

That's so refreshing, David. A genius like you using my woodbutcher's axiom for software dev:
Measure once, cut twice.

or it's corollary:
Cut first, measure and re-cut later.

Thanks for sharing your spectacular EQ and oh, so human, development cycle with us Kvr plebs!

10-Band PLParEQ is Here!