10-Band PLParEQ is Here!
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 236 posts since 5 Oct, 2005 from Tucson, AZ, USA
The new shipments include a thumbnail description of how to use the GUI. A full manual is being written as we speak. That will detail the inner processing and filter descriptions so that you can understand precisely what this plugin is doing.
- DM
- DM
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 236 posts since 5 Oct, 2005 from Tucson, AZ, USA
Version 1.98 fixes a broken double-click graph-knob gain reset (broke in 1.96)
But more... the speed has almost doubled again... perhaps more...
- DM
But more... the speed has almost doubled again... perhaps more...
- DM
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 236 posts since 5 Oct, 2005 from Tucson, AZ, USA
.. and IMD spurs have dropped below -150 dB below peak levels in QL 6!
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 236 posts since 5 Oct, 2005 from Tucson, AZ, USA


These spectra taken after processing a 1 kHz pilot sinewave at -0.5 dBFS with a 2-pole Bandpass filter centered at 1 kHz, Q = 1.414, Gain = 0 dB. Sample rate was 44.1 kHz, meaning we upsample to 88.2 kHz for the filtering, and then downsample back to 44.1 kHz for output. Input data was 24-bit mantissa (32-bit floats) and output was dithered from 64-bit floats back to 32-bit floats using our Gaussian dither.
The spurs immediately to either side of the central peak are IMD products. The resolution of this FFT is approximately 0.67 Hz.
- DM
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 236 posts since 5 Oct, 2005 from Tucson, AZ, USA
... I take it back... I should have shown the unprocessed right channel as well. Those spurs are not IMD products. They have the wrong spacing to be IMD products anyway. Those spurs were in the input signal itself.
The IMD products are just barely visible in the blowup as little hitches in the skirts closer in toward 1 kHz. The IMD spacing ought to be about 46 Hz at this Quality setting.
- DM
The IMD products are just barely visible in the blowup as little hitches in the skirts closer in toward 1 kHz. The IMD spacing ought to be about 46 Hz at this Quality setting.
- DM
- KVRAF
- 11386 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
Any chance of getting an optimized 3-band version still?dbmcclain wrote:Version 1.98 fixes a broken double-click graph-knob gain reset (broke in 1.96)
But more... the speed has almost doubled again... perhaps more...
- DM
Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
- KVRian
- 1202 posts since 8 May, 2003 from Munich
David,
unfortunately I'm getting these dropouts still as soon as cpu goes over 50% (but not into overload), with 1.99 that is. Every second without PL, and a whole lot with PL enabled. CPU load stays well under dropout level. The rest of the project is at 45% cpu load, with one 2pole LP it goes to 55%.
any ideas?
Markus
unfortunately I'm getting these dropouts still as soon as cpu goes over 50% (but not into overload), with 1.99 that is. Every second without PL, and a whole lot with PL enabled. CPU load stays well under dropout level. The rest of the project is at 45% cpu load, with one 2pole LP it goes to 55%.
any ideas?
Markus
- KVRAF
- 1817 posts since 1 Jun, 2003
not sure if this answers your question, but the 3band is available via email right now. check back at the site.bmanic wrote:Any chance of getting an optimized 3-band version still?dbmcclain wrote:Version 1.98 fixes a broken double-click graph-knob gain reset (broke in 1.96)
But more... the speed has almost doubled again... perhaps more...
- DM
Cheers!
bManic
-
- KVRist
- 207 posts since 28 May, 2005
This 10band version behaves very unstable in Wavelab 5. In fact, I'm stilll not able to make it work after 4 times it crashed Wavelab. The reality is that it is still damn buggy piece of software. I can't get any further then that buy or evaluate thing.
-
- KVRist
- 172 posts since 6 Jul, 2005 from Roma (Italy)
Just recieve 1.99 v. thanks David really.
- KVRAF
- 1817 posts since 1 Jun, 2003
sure he does. why not?
