KVR Audio

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:37 pm

Reverse Engineer wrote:Taking into account all the colouring and crap they add to wotsits (assuming that's what they are) that lass is gonna get thrush.

only if she actually shoves them up her flange.

Reverse Engineer · Post by **Reverse Engineer** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:41 pm

Kriminal wrote:
Reverse Engineer wrote:Taking into account all the colouring and crap they add to wotsits (assuming that's what they are) that lass is gonna get thrush.
only if she actually shoves them up her flange.

I know

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:44 pm

Reverse Engineer wrote:
Kriminal wrote:
Reverse Engineer wrote:Taking into account all the colouring and crap they add to wotsits (assuming that's what they are) that lass is gonna get thrush.
only if she actually shoves them up her flange.
I know

or crushes some when she sits down and gets the crumbs caught in her curtains, which might then fester and cause a.....you know what im saying

Muff Wiggler · Post by **Muff Wiggler** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:48 pm

i suspect that she went into the tub before the cheese-sticks did...

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:50 pm

did she wiggle about tho? they get in every nook and crany at the slightest chance!

rbet · Post by **rbet** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:50 pm

Kriminal wrote:
Reverse Engineer wrote:Taking into account all the colouring and crap they add to wotsits (assuming that's what they are) that lass is gonna get thrush.
only if she actually shoves them up her flange.

Voxengo offers a flanger?

Muff Wiggler · Post by **Muff Wiggler** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:50 pm

oh she wiggled all right

i mean she wiggled 'all night'

no, wait, it was 'all right'

huh?

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 10:00 pm

who was it that said the girls made the site look cheesy in the first place?

shoot on sight is the first thing that comes to mind.

of course actually having the option to have friendly girls on a site is, erm, sweet. like a valentines card or something.

cptgone · Post by **cptgone** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 10:01 pm

Kingston wrote:shoot on sight is the first thing that comes to mind.

that sounds a little... premature. Easily aroused?

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 10:02 pm

Muff Wiggler · Post by **Muff Wiggler** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 10:03 pm

no shit

they aren't that hot man

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 10:04 pm

(I meant shoot the guy who requested the removal of the images.......

I'll get me coat.)

Muff Wiggler · Post by **Muff Wiggler** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 10:07 pm

Kingston wrote:(I meant shoot the guy who requested the removal of the images.......

I'll get me coat.)

i'm with you there

Hink · Post by **Hink** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 10:19 pm

Kingston wrote:who was it that said the girls made the site look cheesy in the first place?

shoot on sight is the first thing that comes to mind.

of course actually having the option to have friendly girls on a site is, erm, sweet. like a valentines card or something.

It's not the girls, it's the fact they are clip art...but it doesn't matter to me...at the time I think most people discussing it were mostly sarcastic..but in the long run Voxengo's site is cool, especially if you have more then one pluggin......btw if you want to shoot me on sight make it count (and quick please)

I might not be great at a lot of things, but trust me when I say if I get a shot... game over...

Kingston · Post by **Kingston** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 10:21 pm

I'm SORRY! It's the friendly girls thread and I come here guns blazing. *shame*

Voxengo Friendly Girls